Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Alaska Natives and US Indian Policy
View through CrossRef
Abstract
When the United States initiated possessory claims to what became the state of Alaska in 1867, government officials and lawmakers disagreed on whether the Indigenous inhabitants (collectively referred to as Alaska Natives) should be included in the purview of federal Indian policy. Preceding the 1871 cessation of US treaty making with tribal nations by only four years, the federal government did not dispatch any treaty commissioners to Alaska, and the commissioner of Indian affairs argued against extending the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to Alaska Natives. Consequently, government officials never signed treaties with Alaska Native nations, and Congress refrained from adopting legislation that would recognize the existence of Indian Country or aboriginal title in Alaska. This foreclosed the customary means by which the United States recognized and negotiated with Indigenous people as members of sovereign nations. Because Indigenous legal and political rights hinged on nation-to-nation negotiating status in the United States, these decisions had profound implications for Alaska Natives throughout the major federal Indian policy eras of treaty making and removal, assimilation and allotment, the Indian Reorganization Act, Termination Policy, and Self-Determination. Government officials and lawmakers racially and legally conceived of Indigenous Alaskans as distinct from Indigenous peoples of the contiguous states and territories, and these distinctions came to inform law and policy at the outer reaches of US territorial expansion. This ambiguity of their legal status also informed Alaska Native legal and political strategies as they sought to compel the federal government to recognize their land rights, sovereign rights to self-government, and rights as US citizens. To this end, they mobilized their longstanding Indigenous legal and political orders and their relationships to their homelands in navigating US colonialism throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Title: Alaska Natives and US Indian Policy
Description:
Abstract
When the United States initiated possessory claims to what became the state of Alaska in 1867, government officials and lawmakers disagreed on whether the Indigenous inhabitants (collectively referred to as Alaska Natives) should be included in the purview of federal Indian policy.
Preceding the 1871 cessation of US treaty making with tribal nations by only four years, the federal government did not dispatch any treaty commissioners to Alaska, and the commissioner of Indian affairs argued against extending the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs to Alaska Natives.
Consequently, government officials never signed treaties with Alaska Native nations, and Congress refrained from adopting legislation that would recognize the existence of Indian Country or aboriginal title in Alaska.
This foreclosed the customary means by which the United States recognized and negotiated with Indigenous people as members of sovereign nations.
Because Indigenous legal and political rights hinged on nation-to-nation negotiating status in the United States, these decisions had profound implications for Alaska Natives throughout the major federal Indian policy eras of treaty making and removal, assimilation and allotment, the Indian Reorganization Act, Termination Policy, and Self-Determination.
Government officials and lawmakers racially and legally conceived of Indigenous Alaskans as distinct from Indigenous peoples of the contiguous states and territories, and these distinctions came to inform law and policy at the outer reaches of US territorial expansion.
This ambiguity of their legal status also informed Alaska Native legal and political strategies as they sought to compel the federal government to recognize their land rights, sovereign rights to self-government, and rights as US citizens.
To this end, they mobilized their longstanding Indigenous legal and political orders and their relationships to their homelands in navigating US colonialism throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
Related Results
Natural Gases of North America, Volumes 1 & 2
Natural Gases of North America, Volumes 1 & 2
Abstract
Discoveries of natural gas in Alaska have resulted from the search for oil, which has continued intermittently since about 1898. In northern Alaska two gas ...
Checklist of the avian diversity of Alaska
Checklist of the avian diversity of Alaska
More than just a state, Alaska constitutes the entire northwestern extent of North America. Alaska is a vast area (586,412 mi2/1,518,800 km2 of land), spanning nearly 60 degrees of...
Proportional mortality during the 1918 influenza pandemic in Alaska
Proportional mortality during the 1918 influenza pandemic in Alaska
During the 1918 influenza pandemic, social and biological factors combined to create a marked heterogeneity of disease burden within populations. Alaska, then a territory of the Un...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Ivar Skarland (1899-1965)
Ivar Skarland (1899-1965)
Many people who mourn the loss of Ivar Skarland who died 1 January 1965, are grateful for his friendship and influence during the development of science and society in Alaska. Ivar...
Exploring News Consumption Patterns of Female Digital Natives in Abuja
Exploring News Consumption Patterns of Female Digital Natives in Abuja
The emergence of technology has given rise to a shift in the news consumption patterns of media audiences. This study examined the news consumption patterns of Nigeria’s female dig...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
DEIXIS IN JOHN GREEN’S NOVEL ENTITLED LOOKING FOR ALASKA
DEIXIS IN JOHN GREEN’S NOVEL ENTITLED LOOKING FOR ALASKA
This thesis studies the use of deixis that occurred in John Green’s novel entitiled Looking for Alaska. The objectives of this research are classifying the types of deixis found in...

