Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

France, Prussia, or Germany? The Napoleonic Wars and Shifting Allegiances in the Rhineland

View through CrossRef
The following article focuses on the Rhineland, and more specifically, the region on the left (or west) bank of the Rhine bounded in the north and west by the Low Countries and France. This German-speaking region was occupied by the armies of revolutionary France after 1792. De jure annexation followed the Treaty of Lunéville (1801), and French rule lasted until 1814. Most of the Rhineland was awarded in 1815 to Prussia and remained a constituent part until after the Second World War. The Rhineland experienced Napoleonic rule first hand. Its four departments—the Roër, Rhin-et-Moselle, Sarre, and Mont-Tonnerre—were treated like the others in metropolitan France, and it is this status that makes the region distinct in German-speaking Europe. This had consequences both in the Napoleonic period and in the century that followed the departure of the last French soldier. This alone would constitute sufficient reason for studying the region. More broadly, however, the Rhenish experience in the French period sheds light on the much broader phenomena of state formation and nation building. Before 1792, the Rhenish political order appeared in many respects a throwback to the late Middle Ages. Extreme territorial fragmentation, city states, church states, and mini states distinguished its landscape. These survived the early-modern period thanks in part to Great Power rivalry and the protective mantle provided by the Holy Roman Empire. Then, suddenly, came rule by France which, in the form of the First Republic and Napoleon's First Empire, represented the most demanding state the world had seen up to that point. This state imposed itself on a region unused to big government. It might be thought that bitter confrontation would have resulted. Yet, and here is a paradox this article wishes to address, many aspects of French rule gained acceptance in the region, and defense of the Napoleonic legacy formed a component of the “Rhenish” identity that came into being in the nineteenth century.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: France, Prussia, or Germany? The Napoleonic Wars and Shifting Allegiances in the Rhineland
Description:
The following article focuses on the Rhineland, and more specifically, the region on the left (or west) bank of the Rhine bounded in the north and west by the Low Countries and France.
This German-speaking region was occupied by the armies of revolutionary France after 1792.
De jure annexation followed the Treaty of Lunéville (1801), and French rule lasted until 1814.
Most of the Rhineland was awarded in 1815 to Prussia and remained a constituent part until after the Second World War.
The Rhineland experienced Napoleonic rule first hand.
Its four departments—the Roër, Rhin-et-Moselle, Sarre, and Mont-Tonnerre—were treated like the others in metropolitan France, and it is this status that makes the region distinct in German-speaking Europe.
This had consequences both in the Napoleonic period and in the century that followed the departure of the last French soldier.
This alone would constitute sufficient reason for studying the region.
More broadly, however, the Rhenish experience in the French period sheds light on the much broader phenomena of state formation and nation building.
Before 1792, the Rhenish political order appeared in many respects a throwback to the late Middle Ages.
Extreme territorial fragmentation, city states, church states, and mini states distinguished its landscape.
These survived the early-modern period thanks in part to Great Power rivalry and the protective mantle provided by the Holy Roman Empire.
Then, suddenly, came rule by France which, in the form of the First Republic and Napoleon's First Empire, represented the most demanding state the world had seen up to that point.
This state imposed itself on a region unused to big government.
It might be thought that bitter confrontation would have resulted.
Yet, and here is a paradox this article wishes to address, many aspects of French rule gained acceptance in the region, and defense of the Napoleonic legacy formed a component of the “Rhenish” identity that came into being in the nineteenth century.

Related Results

Napoleonic Wars (1802–1815)
Napoleonic Wars (1802–1815)
AbstractA series of conflicts fought between Napoleonic France and changing sets of coalitions of European powers. The starting point for the Napoleonic Wars is usually considered ...
John Williams to Non-Williams
John Williams to Non-Williams
John Williams may have dominion over the Star Wars film scores with eighteen hours of music across nine films, but the mantle of responsibility for the Star Wars musical canon en m...
The Cambridge History of the Napoleonic Wars
The Cambridge History of the Napoleonic Wars
The Napoleonic Wars saw almost two decades of brutal fighting. Fighting took place on an unprecedented scale, from the frozen wastelands of Russia to the rugged mountains of the Pe...
Franco-Prussian War, 1870–1871 (Franco-German War)
Franco-Prussian War, 1870–1871 (Franco-German War)
The Franco-German War of 1870–1871 was the last of the three so-called German wars of unification, and it marked a decisive turning point in 19th-century European history. This dip...
The models of German political space in France’s foreign policy of the XIX century
The models of German political space in France’s foreign policy of the XIX century
The subject of this research is the relations between Napoleonic France and German states in the early XIX century. The object of this research is the various models of the develop...
Sir James Harris, Memorandum for Cabinet, May 9, 1785
Sir James Harris, Memorandum for Cabinet, May 9, 1785
To state the situation of Europe as it appears from the Correspondence. It is such as claims equally the attention of England and Prussia.Austria and France are united for views of...
FREDERICK II OF PRUSSIA AND PAUL I IN THE ASSESSMENT OF GERMAN HISTORIANS
FREDERICK II OF PRUSSIA AND PAUL I IN THE ASSESSMENT OF GERMAN HISTORIANS
The purpose of the article is to analyze the image of the Prussian King Frederick II, who received the title «The Great» in history, and the Russian Emperor Paul I as a continuer o...
The End of the Rhineland Model? Changing Labour Relations in Germany - Evidence from the Minimum Wage Debate
The End of the Rhineland Model? Changing Labour Relations in Germany - Evidence from the Minimum Wage Debate
<p>Hypothesis: Effects of globalisation, European Integration and re-unification have pushed the German political economy away from its unique institutional setting, framed a...

Back to Top