Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Data ownership and data publishing
View through CrossRef
"Data ownership" is actually an oxymoron, because there could not be a copyright (ownership) on facts or ideas, hence no data onwership rights and law exist. The term refers to various kinds of data protection instruments: Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) (mostly copyright) asserted to indicate some kind of data ownership, confidentiality clauses/rules, database right protection (in the European Union only), or personal data protection (GDPR) (Scassa 2018). Data protection is often realised via different mechanisms of "data hoarding", that is witholding access to data for various reasons (Sieber 1989). Data hoarding, however, does not put the data into someone's ownership. Nonetheless, the access to and the re-use of data, and biodiversuty data in particular, is hampered by technical, economic, sociological, legal and other factors, although there should be no formal legal provisions related to copyright that may prevent anyone who needs to use them (Egloff et al. 2014, Egloff et al. 2017, see also the Bouchout Declaration).
One of the best ways to provide access to data is to publish these so that the data creators and holders are credited for their efforts. As one of the pioneers in biodiversity data publishing, Pensoft has adopted a multiple-approach data publishing model, resulting in the ARPHA-BioDiv toolbox and in extensive Strategies and Guidelines for Publishing of Biodiversity Data (Penev et al. 2017a, Penev et al. 2017b). ARPHA-BioDiv consists of several data publishing workflows:
Deposition of underlying data in an external repository and/or its publication as supplementary file(s) to the related article which are then linked and/or cited in-tex. Supplementary files are published under their own DOIs to increase citability).
Description of data in data papers after they have been deposited in trusted repositories and/or as supplementary files; the systme allows for data papers to be submitted both as plain text or converted into manuscripts from Ecological Metadata Language (EML) metadata.
Import of structured data into the article text from tables or via web services and their susequent download/distribution from the published article as part of the integrated narrative and data publishing workflow realised by the Biodiversity Data Journal.
Publication of data in structured, semanticaly enriched, full-text XMLs where data elements are machine-readable and easy-to-harvest.
Extraction of Linked Open Data (LOD) from literature, which is then converted into interoperable RDF triples (in accordance with the OpenBiodiv-O ontology) (Senderov et al. 2018) and stored in the OpenBiodiv Biodiversity Knowledge Graph
Deposition of underlying data in an external repository and/or its publication as supplementary file(s) to the related article which are then linked and/or cited in-tex. Supplementary files are published under their own DOIs to increase citability).
Description of data in data papers after they have been deposited in trusted repositories and/or as supplementary files; the systme allows for data papers to be submitted both as plain text or converted into manuscripts from Ecological Metadata Language (EML) metadata.
Import of structured data into the article text from tables or via web services and their susequent download/distribution from the published article as part of the integrated narrative and data publishing workflow realised by the Biodiversity Data Journal.
Publication of data in structured, semanticaly enriched, full-text XMLs where data elements are machine-readable and easy-to-harvest.
Extraction of Linked Open Data (LOD) from literature, which is then converted into interoperable RDF triples (in accordance with the OpenBiodiv-O ontology) (Senderov et al. 2018) and stored in the OpenBiodiv Biodiversity Knowledge Graph
In combination with text and data mining (TDM) technologies for legacy literature (PDF) developed by Plazi, these approaches show different angles to the future of biodiversity data publishing and, lay the foundations of an entire data publishing ecosystem in the field, while also supplying FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data to several interoperable overarching infrastructures, such as Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Biodiversity Literature Repository (BLR), Plazi TreatmentBank, OpenBiodiv, as well as to various end users.
Title: Data ownership and data publishing
Description:
"Data ownership" is actually an oxymoron, because there could not be a copyright (ownership) on facts or ideas, hence no data onwership rights and law exist.
The term refers to various kinds of data protection instruments: Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) (mostly copyright) asserted to indicate some kind of data ownership, confidentiality clauses/rules, database right protection (in the European Union only), or personal data protection (GDPR) (Scassa 2018).
Data protection is often realised via different mechanisms of "data hoarding", that is witholding access to data for various reasons (Sieber 1989).
Data hoarding, however, does not put the data into someone's ownership.
Nonetheless, the access to and the re-use of data, and biodiversuty data in particular, is hampered by technical, economic, sociological, legal and other factors, although there should be no formal legal provisions related to copyright that may prevent anyone who needs to use them (Egloff et al.
2014, Egloff et al.
2017, see also the Bouchout Declaration).
One of the best ways to provide access to data is to publish these so that the data creators and holders are credited for their efforts.
As one of the pioneers in biodiversity data publishing, Pensoft has adopted a multiple-approach data publishing model, resulting in the ARPHA-BioDiv toolbox and in extensive Strategies and Guidelines for Publishing of Biodiversity Data (Penev et al.
2017a, Penev et al.
2017b).
ARPHA-BioDiv consists of several data publishing workflows:
Deposition of underlying data in an external repository and/or its publication as supplementary file(s) to the related article which are then linked and/or cited in-tex.
Supplementary files are published under their own DOIs to increase citability).
Description of data in data papers after they have been deposited in trusted repositories and/or as supplementary files; the systme allows for data papers to be submitted both as plain text or converted into manuscripts from Ecological Metadata Language (EML) metadata.
Import of structured data into the article text from tables or via web services and their susequent download/distribution from the published article as part of the integrated narrative and data publishing workflow realised by the Biodiversity Data Journal.
Publication of data in structured, semanticaly enriched, full-text XMLs where data elements are machine-readable and easy-to-harvest.
Extraction of Linked Open Data (LOD) from literature, which is then converted into interoperable RDF triples (in accordance with the OpenBiodiv-O ontology) (Senderov et al.
2018) and stored in the OpenBiodiv Biodiversity Knowledge Graph
Deposition of underlying data in an external repository and/or its publication as supplementary file(s) to the related article which are then linked and/or cited in-tex.
Supplementary files are published under their own DOIs to increase citability).
Description of data in data papers after they have been deposited in trusted repositories and/or as supplementary files; the systme allows for data papers to be submitted both as plain text or converted into manuscripts from Ecological Metadata Language (EML) metadata.
Import of structured data into the article text from tables or via web services and their susequent download/distribution from the published article as part of the integrated narrative and data publishing workflow realised by the Biodiversity Data Journal.
Publication of data in structured, semanticaly enriched, full-text XMLs where data elements are machine-readable and easy-to-harvest.
Extraction of Linked Open Data (LOD) from literature, which is then converted into interoperable RDF triples (in accordance with the OpenBiodiv-O ontology) (Senderov et al.
2018) and stored in the OpenBiodiv Biodiversity Knowledge Graph
In combination with text and data mining (TDM) technologies for legacy literature (PDF) developed by Plazi, these approaches show different angles to the future of biodiversity data publishing and, lay the foundations of an entire data publishing ecosystem in the field, while also supplying FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data to several interoperable overarching infrastructures, such as Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Biodiversity Literature Repository (BLR), Plazi TreatmentBank, OpenBiodiv, as well as to various end users.
Related Results
LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baum
LB2306. Population Pharmacokinetic (PPK), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic attainment (PTA), and Clinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Sulbactam-Durlobactam (SUL-DUR) to Support Dose Selection for the Treatment of Acinetobacter baum
Abstract
Background
SUL-DUR is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination in development for the treatment of ABC infections, ...
In Guns We Trust: NFA Firearm Trusts and Silencing the Hazards of NFA Firearm Ownership
In Guns We Trust: NFA Firearm Trusts and Silencing the Hazards of NFA Firearm Ownership
Individual ownership of firearms has been one of the storied rights of our country. During the Founding Era, firearms were plentiful among the colonists, providing them with protec...
Ownership Structure and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Does Audit Quality and Firm Size Matter?
Ownership Structure and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Does Audit Quality and Firm Size Matter?
This study investigates the direct and indirect relationships between different dimensions of ownership structure (foreign ownership, managerial ownership, ownership concentration ...
Generic Ownership: a Practical Approach to Ownership and Confinement in Object-Oriented Programming Languages
Generic Ownership: a Practical Approach to Ownership and Confinement in Object-Oriented Programming Languages
<p>Modern object-oriented programming languages support many techniques that simplify the work of a programmer. Among them is generic types: the ability to create generic des...
Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Pada Profitabilitas Perusahaan Asuransi di Indonesia
Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Pada Profitabilitas Perusahaan Asuransi di Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of ownership structure on the profitability of insurance companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Ownership st...
Ownership structure and female board representation in selected Nigeria-listed firms
Ownership structure and female board representation in selected Nigeria-listed firms
Purpose
This paper examines the influence of various ownership structures on female participation on the boards of listed firms in Nigeria between 2012 and 2021. It focuses on how ...
Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: The Influence of Family Directors and Non-Family Directors
Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: The Influence of Family Directors and Non-Family Directors
Abstract
Purpose
The main purpose of the study is to examine the influence of family directors on the firm performance of...
PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN, KEBIJAKAN HUTANG DAN PERTUMBUHAN ASET TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN DIVIDEN
PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN, KEBIJAKAN HUTANG DAN PERTUMBUHAN ASET TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN DIVIDEN
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyediakan bukti praktis tentang dampak kebijakan dividen yang disebabkan oleh ekspansi aset, kebijakan utang, kepemilikan institusional, ke...

