Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cesarean Section Scar Niche at King Hamad University Hospital (KHUH)

View through CrossRef
Background: Cesarean scar defects (CSD), or niche, are a recognized complication of cesarean sections, with reported prevalence ranging from 24% - 70%. While often asymptomatic, CSD can cause postmenstrual bleeding, infertility, dysmennorhea, abdominal pain, obstetric risks like uterine rupture, and placenta accreta. Risk factors include technique and closure of hysterotomy incision, multiple CS, and uterine position, though evidence remains inconsistent. Despite a rising global CS rate, regional data on CSD prevalence and predictors are limited. This study evaluates CSD frequency and associated factors in a clinical cohort to guide in identifying risk factors, prevention, and management strategies. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 111 women who delivered via CS. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected, and CSD was assessed via ultrasound. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 20.0, employing Chi-square, Student t-test, and Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate. Results: The prevalence of CSD was 9% (10/111). The mean residual myometrial thickness in affected women was 6.50 ± 7.75 mm (median: 3.5 mm). No significant associations were found between CSD and age (p = 0.785), BMI (p = 0.287), parity (p = 1.000), or diabetes (p = 1.000). However, women with ≥2 previous CS showed a non-significant trend toward higher CSD rates (40% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.210). Notably, retroverted uterus (RVF) was more common in the CSD group (30% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.075). Surgical factors, including double-layer closure and Vicryl sutures (100% of cases), and locking sutures and the first layer of the uterus, did not influence CSD development.Conclusion: The prevalence of CSD in this cohort was lower than global estimates, with no significant demographic or surgical risk factors identified. The trend toward higher CSD rates in women with multiple CS and RVF warrants further investigation. These findings underscore the need for standardized surgical techniques and long-term monitoring to mitigate CSD-related morbidity.
Title: Prevalence and Risk Factors of Cesarean Section Scar Niche at King Hamad University Hospital (KHUH)
Description:
Background: Cesarean scar defects (CSD), or niche, are a recognized complication of cesarean sections, with reported prevalence ranging from 24% - 70%.
While often asymptomatic, CSD can cause postmenstrual bleeding, infertility, dysmennorhea, abdominal pain, obstetric risks like uterine rupture, and placenta accreta.
Risk factors include technique and closure of hysterotomy incision, multiple CS, and uterine position, though evidence remains inconsistent.
Despite a rising global CS rate, regional data on CSD prevalence and predictors are limited.
This study evaluates CSD frequency and associated factors in a clinical cohort to guide in identifying risk factors, prevention, and management strategies.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 111 women who delivered via CS.
Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected, and CSD was assessed via ultrasound.
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 20.
0, employing Chi-square, Student t-test, and Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate.
Results: The prevalence of CSD was 9% (10/111).
The mean residual myometrial thickness in affected women was 6.
50 ± 7.
75 mm (median: 3.
5 mm).
No significant associations were found between CSD and age (p = 0.
785), BMI (p = 0.
287), parity (p = 1.
000), or diabetes (p = 1.
000).
However, women with ≥2 previous CS showed a non-significant trend toward higher CSD rates (40% vs.
15.
8%, p = 0.
210).
Notably, retroverted uterus (RVF) was more common in the CSD group (30% vs.
8.
9%, p = 0.
075).
Surgical factors, including double-layer closure and Vicryl sutures (100% of cases), and locking sutures and the first layer of the uterus, did not influence CSD development.
Conclusion: The prevalence of CSD in this cohort was lower than global estimates, with no significant demographic or surgical risk factors identified.
The trend toward higher CSD rates in women with multiple CS and RVF warrants further investigation.
These findings underscore the need for standardized surgical techniques and long-term monitoring to mitigate CSD-related morbidity.

Related Results

Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section
Safety of Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous One Cesarean Section
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the safety and integrity of scar at repeat cesarean section, in patients with previous one cesarean section performed at different settings. Study...
Evaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
Evaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
To evaluate the safety and integrity of uterine scar at repeat cesarean section in patients with previous one cesarean section (C/S). A prospective study was Carried out in a terti...
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Introduction: A variant of extrapelvic endometriosis known as "surgical scar endometriosis" is defined by the development of functional endometrial glands and stroma close to the s...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Intra-operative Findings during Caesarean Section for Suspected Scar Dehiscence
Intra-operative Findings during Caesarean Section for Suspected Scar Dehiscence
Background: The rising rate of cesarean sections (CS), particularly those performed preterm due to suspected scar tenderness, has raised concerns about clinical decision-making and...
Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale (JSS) for Assessing Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale (JSS) for Assessing Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
AbstractThe Vancouver scar scale, the Manchester scar scale, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) are all very well-known scar evaluation methods. These tools...
Comparison of Aesthetic Quality of the Final Scar in Abdominoplasty with Conventional and Mini Inverted t-Scar
Comparison of Aesthetic Quality of the Final Scar in Abdominoplasty with Conventional and Mini Inverted t-Scar
Background and objectives: Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures. The excess skin in the conventional abdominoplasty is transversely excised and ...

Back to Top