Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

<b>Bruxism Burden and Masticatory Performance in Orthodontic Patients</b>

View through CrossRef
Background: Bruxism is highly prevalent among orthodontic patients and may negatively affect masticatory efficiency, muscular function, and pain perception. Despite increasing recognition of parafunctional jaw activity during orthodontic treatment, the functional consequences of bruxism on chewing performance remain insufficiently investigated. Objective: To assess the association between bruxism risk and masticatory performance, and to examine the relationship of bruxism risk and chewing dysfunction with pain severity among orthodontic patients. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 115 orthodontic patients recruited through convenience sampling from dental hospitals and clinics in Lahore, Pakistan. Bruxism risk was assessed using the Bruxism Evaluation Questionnaire (BEQ), chewing performance was evaluated using the Chewing Function Questionnaire (CFQ), and pain severity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27.0.1. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square tests were applied, with statistical significance established at p < 0.05. Results: High bruxism risk was identified in 88 participants (76.5%). Mild chewing difficulty was the most frequent chewing category (43.5%), while 27.0% demonstrated moderate chewing difficulty. Significant associations were observed between bruxism risk and chewing dysfunction, χ²(6) = 41.967, p < 0.001, bruxism risk and pain severity, χ²(2) = 26.023, p < 0.001, and chewing dysfunction and pain severity, χ²(6) = 41.967, p < 0.001. Among participants with high bruxism risk, 85.2% demonstrated some degree of chewing dysfunction, compared with 33.3% in the low-risk group. Moderate-to-severe pain was also substantially more frequent among high-risk participants. Conclusion: Bruxism risk was highly prevalent among orthodontic patients and was significantly associated with impaired masticatory performance and increased pain severity. These findings support routine bruxism screening and chewing function assessment during orthodontic treatment and emphasize the need for multidisciplinary strategies aimed at improving oral function and reducing pain-related burden. Keywords: Bruxism; masticatory performance; chewing function; orthodontic treatment; orofacial pain; parafunctional habits.
Title: <b>Bruxism Burden and Masticatory Performance in Orthodontic Patients</b>
Description:
Background: Bruxism is highly prevalent among orthodontic patients and may negatively affect masticatory efficiency, muscular function, and pain perception.
Despite increasing recognition of parafunctional jaw activity during orthodontic treatment, the functional consequences of bruxism on chewing performance remain insufficiently investigated.
Objective: To assess the association between bruxism risk and masticatory performance, and to examine the relationship of bruxism risk and chewing dysfunction with pain severity among orthodontic patients.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 115 orthodontic patients recruited through convenience sampling from dental hospitals and clinics in Lahore, Pakistan.
Bruxism risk was assessed using the Bruxism Evaluation Questionnaire (BEQ), chewing performance was evaluated using the Chewing Function Questionnaire (CFQ), and pain severity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27.
1.
Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square tests were applied, with statistical significance established at p < 0.
05.
Results: High bruxism risk was identified in 88 participants (76.
5%).
Mild chewing difficulty was the most frequent chewing category (43.
5%), while 27.
0% demonstrated moderate chewing difficulty.
Significant associations were observed between bruxism risk and chewing dysfunction, χ²(6) = 41.
967, p < 0.
001, bruxism risk and pain severity, χ²(2) = 26.
023, p < 0.
001, and chewing dysfunction and pain severity, χ²(6) = 41.
967, p < 0.
001.
Among participants with high bruxism risk, 85.
2% demonstrated some degree of chewing dysfunction, compared with 33.
3% in the low-risk group.
Moderate-to-severe pain was also substantially more frequent among high-risk participants.
Conclusion: Bruxism risk was highly prevalent among orthodontic patients and was significantly associated with impaired masticatory performance and increased pain severity.
These findings support routine bruxism screening and chewing function assessment during orthodontic treatment and emphasize the need for multidisciplinary strategies aimed at improving oral function and reducing pain-related burden.
Keywords: Bruxism; masticatory performance; chewing function; orthodontic treatment; orofacial pain; parafunctional habits.

Related Results

Acupuncture as therapeutic resource in patient with bruxism
Acupuncture as therapeutic resource in patient with bruxism
Bruxism is the harmful habit of clenching or grinding the teeth during the day and / or night, with unconscious pattern, with particular intensity and frequency, outside the functi...
The prevalence of awake bruxism and sleep bruxism in the Dutch adult population
The prevalence of awake bruxism and sleep bruxism in the Dutch adult population
SummaryBackgroundAwake bruxism and sleep bruxism are common conditions amongst adult populations, although prevalence data are scarce.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the preval...
Prevalence of sleep bruxism and associated factors in Tanta preschool children
Prevalence of sleep bruxism and associated factors in Tanta preschool children
Introduction Bruxism is a common condition in the pediatric dentistry clinics; it is reported more frequently in children than in adults and has different effects on a ...
Sleep bruxism, bite force, morning symptoms, and home electromyography: a cross-sectional study
Sleep bruxism, bite force, morning symptoms, and home electromyography: a cross-sectional study
Abstract Background Sleep bruxism is a common parafunctional activity marked by involuntary tooth grinding or clenching during sleep and has been linked to tooth w...
UNLOCKING THE MIND-BODY CONNECTION: BRUXISM VERSUS PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS
UNLOCKING THE MIND-BODY CONNECTION: BRUXISM VERSUS PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS
Bruxism is a non-functional activity of the dental-maxillary apparatus characterized by repetitive, unconscious movements, such as grinding or clenching teeth and/or thrusting the ...
Stress assessment in patients with clinically diagnosed sleep bruxism
Stress assessment in patients with clinically diagnosed sleep bruxism
Background/Aim. Many studies investigated association between stress, anxiety or personality traits and sleep bruxism (SB), but results are still contradictory. We aimed to investi...
Periodontal Implications of Orthodontic Treatment: Assessment of The Balance between Tooth Movement and Surrounding Tissue
Periodontal Implications of Orthodontic Treatment: Assessment of The Balance between Tooth Movement and Surrounding Tissue
Orthodontic treatment also aims to maintain ideal periodontal health. Gingival/periodontal conditions and orthodontic interventions have a complicated relationship because orthodon...
Prevalence of Bruxism among the Students of Gulf Medical University: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study
Prevalence of Bruxism among the Students of Gulf Medical University: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study
Introduction: Bruxism is a multifactorial phenomenon that involves grinding or clenching of teeth. The parafunctional habit includes abnormal tooth wear, tooth fracture...

Back to Top