Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Did the Native Soil Movement Really Exist? (Polemical Notes)
View through CrossRef
This article deals with ideological and aesthetic foundations of the 19th-century literary movement which was later called Pochvennichestvo (Native Soil). Some scholars have suggested that the three principal figures of this movement — Fyodor Dostoevsky, Apollon Grigoryev and Nikolay Strakhov — were so different in their views that it is more reasonable to investigate the ideas of each of them separately. V. N. Zakharov, an outstanding expert on Dostoevsky, asserted in his article “Pochvennichestvo in Russian Literature: Metaphor as a Mythologeme” (2012) that the only one who truly lived up to the Native Soil principles was Dostoevsky, who set forth the program of the new movement in the Announcement about the subscription to the journal Vremya in 1860. According to Zakharov, unlike the other, “false”, members of the movement, who were just authors of Vremya, Dostoevsky widely used the metaphor pochva (soil) as a mythologeme in this article and in his subsequent works. In fact, Zakharov shared the opinion that there was a significant difference in the views of these writers. In this case, however, the very existence of the Pochvennichestvo as a single movement can be questioned. The present article argues that the term pochva was no less frequently employed by the other leading representatives of the movement and that the use of this mythologeme is not the only indication of their adherence to it. Although Dostoevsky, Grigoryev and Strakhov had serious ideological divergences, their philosophical and aesthetic views were much closer. The Native Soil writers shared a positive attitude towards spiritual independence and a national orientation of Russian literature. All of them relied on the organic essence of life and creativity. They highly appreciated the importance of Pushkin and denied excessive theorizing, aristocratic and nihilistic tendencies. The article shows how the Native Soil principles were developed by Dostoevsky, Grigoryev and Strakhov during their collaboration in the journals Vremya and Epokha and unfolded later in the journal Zarya, edited by Strakhov, and in the journal Grazhdanin, edited by Dostoevsky, as well as in Dostoevsky’s famous Pushkin Speech
Institute of Russian Literature Pushkinskij Dom RAN
Title: Did the Native Soil Movement Really Exist? (Polemical Notes)
Description:
This article deals with ideological and aesthetic foundations of the 19th-century literary movement which was later called Pochvennichestvo (Native Soil).
Some scholars have suggested that the three principal figures of this movement — Fyodor Dostoevsky, Apollon Grigoryev and Nikolay Strakhov — were so different in their views that it is more reasonable to investigate the ideas of each of them separately.
V.
N.
Zakharov, an outstanding expert on Dostoevsky, asserted in his article “Pochvennichestvo in Russian Literature: Metaphor as a Mythologeme” (2012) that the only one who truly lived up to the Native Soil principles was Dostoevsky, who set forth the program of the new movement in the Announcement about the subscription to the journal Vremya in 1860.
According to Zakharov, unlike the other, “false”, members of the movement, who were just authors of Vremya, Dostoevsky widely used the metaphor pochva (soil) as a mythologeme in this article and in his subsequent works.
In fact, Zakharov shared the opinion that there was a significant difference in the views of these writers.
In this case, however, the very existence of the Pochvennichestvo as a single movement can be questioned.
The present article argues that the term pochva was no less frequently employed by the other leading representatives of the movement and that the use of this mythologeme is not the only indication of their adherence to it.
Although Dostoevsky, Grigoryev and Strakhov had serious ideological divergences, their philosophical and aesthetic views were much closer.
The Native Soil writers shared a positive attitude towards spiritual independence and a national orientation of Russian literature.
All of them relied on the organic essence of life and creativity.
They highly appreciated the importance of Pushkin and denied excessive theorizing, aristocratic and nihilistic tendencies.
The article shows how the Native Soil principles were developed by Dostoevsky, Grigoryev and Strakhov during their collaboration in the journals Vremya and Epokha and unfolded later in the journal Zarya, edited by Strakhov, and in the journal Grazhdanin, edited by Dostoevsky, as well as in Dostoevsky’s famous Pushkin Speech.
Related Results
Ecological soil physics as section of ecological soil science
Ecological soil physics as section of ecological soil science
Nowadays, there is a general penetration of ecology in other related sciences. Soil science is not an exception. To the evidence of this, the works of soil scientists may serve, th...
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
<p>Coastal environments are exposed to anthropogenic activities such as frequent marine traffic and restructuring, i.e., addition, removal or replacing with man-made structur...
Soil-Available Nutrients Associated with Soil Chemical and Aggregate Properties following Vegetation Restoration in Western Sichuan, China
Soil-Available Nutrients Associated with Soil Chemical and Aggregate Properties following Vegetation Restoration in Western Sichuan, China
The status and drivers of soil-available nutrients in plant-recovered soils are not fully understood, limiting our ability to explore the role of soil-available nutrients in soil g...
Evaluation of digital maps of top-soil properties compared to large-scale laboratory soil data and synergies towards a better European soils’ delineation. 
Evaluation of digital maps of top-soil properties compared to large-scale laboratory soil data and synergies towards a better European soils’ delineation. 
Soil maps describe spatial variability by using traditional or predictive soil mapping techniques. Conventional soil maps group soils based on their similar cartographic properties...
Soil health assessment of the Sanborn Field long-term experimental study
Soil health assessment of the Sanborn Field long-term experimental study
Soil health assessment uses a combination of potential indicators affecting soil processes to comprehensively monitor soil change, caused by cropping systems and soil management. T...
Nature of Soil Erodibility
Nature of Soil Erodibility
Inherent properties of a soil determine the extent to which that soil will erode. These properties are soil texture, soil structure, soil permeability, and the amount of soil organ...
Examining the benefits and sensitivity of vertically heterogeneous hyper resolution land surface model towards simulating a farm scale soil moisture profile in Upper Bhima Basin, India
Examining the benefits and sensitivity of vertically heterogeneous hyper resolution land surface model towards simulating a farm scale soil moisture profile in Upper Bhima Basin, India
Soil moisture is an important state variable with high spatiotemporal variability depending on land and climate variables. The importance of various physical controls on soil moist...
Soil biota and non-native plant invasions.
Soil biota and non-native plant invasions.
Abstract
The trajectory of plant invasions - for better or for worse - can be tied to interactions between plants and the soil community. Here, we highlight five broad ways...

