Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Social and Political Views of Alexey Filippov and Russian National Democrats

View through CrossRef
The purpose of the article is to analyze the social and political views of Alexey Filippov during the years of his cooperation with the Russian National Democrats. It reveals the achievements and gaps in the historiography of Filippov’s ideological biography. Considerable attention is paid to the formation of the thinker’s original views on the construction of the greatness of Russia by the hands of non-Russians. The reasons for the unpopularity of Filippov’s “progressive nationalism” and the conditions of his activity in St Petersburg since 1912 are considered. The article analyzes the collaboration of Filippov with Alexander Gariazin; the chronology and circumstances of their publication of the weekly “Dym Otechestva” and the monthly “Zhurnal Dlia Vsekh” (“The Journal for All”). Filippov’s sharp criticism of the leaders of the right-wing parties in Russia, the aristocracy, the ruling dynasty, ministers, the Holy Synod is emphasized. His loyalty to the monarchy as a form of government, and personally to Nicholas II, as well as the loyalty of other National Democrats, which they tried to use in confrontation with the All-Russian National Union and the Union of the Russian People, is pointed out. The positions of Filippov and his associates on Russian foreign policy, the reasons for their calls for the immediate war against Germany and Austria-Hungary are demonstrated. It is concluded that behind the eclecticism of Filippov’s views was hidden his sincere conviction in the necessity of combining democracy, rights and freedoms with strong imperial power and national patriotism. The article demonstrates the continuity of Filippov’s views throughout his life, including the Soviet period.
Title: Social and Political Views of Alexey Filippov and Russian National Democrats
Description:
The purpose of the article is to analyze the social and political views of Alexey Filippov during the years of his cooperation with the Russian National Democrats.
It reveals the achievements and gaps in the historiography of Filippov’s ideological biography.
Considerable attention is paid to the formation of the thinker’s original views on the construction of the greatness of Russia by the hands of non-Russians.
The reasons for the unpopularity of Filippov’s “progressive nationalism” and the conditions of his activity in St Petersburg since 1912 are considered.
The article analyzes the collaboration of Filippov with Alexander Gariazin; the chronology and circumstances of their publication of the weekly “Dym Otechestva” and the monthly “Zhurnal Dlia Vsekh” (“The Journal for All”).
Filippov’s sharp criticism of the leaders of the right-wing parties in Russia, the aristocracy, the ruling dynasty, ministers, the Holy Synod is emphasized.
His loyalty to the monarchy as a form of government, and personally to Nicholas II, as well as the loyalty of other National Democrats, which they tried to use in confrontation with the All-Russian National Union and the Union of the Russian People, is pointed out.
The positions of Filippov and his associates on Russian foreign policy, the reasons for their calls for the immediate war against Germany and Austria-Hungary are demonstrated.
It is concluded that behind the eclecticism of Filippov’s views was hidden his sincere conviction in the necessity of combining democracy, rights and freedoms with strong imperial power and national patriotism.
The article demonstrates the continuity of Filippov’s views throughout his life, including the Soviet period.

Related Results

Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Delio Cantimori (1904-1966) was one of the most important Italian historians of the twentieth century. His studies on sixteenth-century religious history, on Italian 'Jacobinism' a...
SEALS AND COATS OF ARMS OF MUKACHEVO IN THE RESEARCH OF OLEKSIY FILIPPOV
SEALS AND COATS OF ARMS OF MUKACHEVO IN THE RESEARCH OF OLEKSIY FILIPPOV
In this article, the author tried to analyze and evaluate Oleksiy Filippov's research on the seal and coat of arms of the city of Mukachevo, which became his second homeland. Since...
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
TheMulti-Purpose Detector (MPD) is one of the three experiments of the Nuclotron Ion Collider-fAcility (NICA) complex, which is currently under construction at the Joint Institute ...
Political Culture in Kashmir: 1930–1990
Political Culture in Kashmir: 1930–1990
Summary The 20th century, especially the post-1930s, represents a period of critical transformation in the Kashmir’s political landscape, marked by the rise of po...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., & Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...
Democrats overestimate Republicans’ support for political violence more than vice versa
Democrats overestimate Republicans’ support for political violence more than vice versa
Concerns about political violence have intensified across the United States. We conducted two pre-registered studies (N=408 and N=906) examining how Americans perceive support for ...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...

Back to Top