Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pupil-linked arousal biases evidence accumulation towards desirable percepts during perceptual decision-making

View through CrossRef
Abstract People are biased towards seeing outcomes they are motivated to see. The arousal system coordinates the body’s response to motivationally significant events, and is well positioned to regulate motivational effects on sensory perception. However, it remains unclear whether arousal would enhance or reduce motivational biases. Here we measured pupil dilation as a measure of arousal while participants performed a visual categorization task. We used monetary bonuses to motivate participants to see one category over another. Even though the reward-maximizing strategy was to perform the task accurately, participants were more likely to report seeing the motivationally desirable category. Furthermore, higher arousal levels were associated with making motivationally biased responses. Analyses using computational models suggest that arousal enhanced motivational effects by biasing evidence accumulation in favor of motivationally desirable percepts. These results suggest heightened arousal biases people towards what they want to see and away from an objective representation of the environment. Statement of Relevance When confronted with an event of motivational significance (e.g., an opportunity to earn a huge reward), people often experience a strong arousal response that includes increased sweating, faster heart-rate and larger pupils. Does this arousal response help individuals make more accurate decisions, or does it instead bias and impair decision-making? This work examines the effects of arousal on how people decide what they see when they are motivated to see a particular outcome. We found that heightened arousal, as measured by larger pupils, was associated with a bias in how participants accumulated sensory evidence to make their decisions. As a result, participants became more likely to report seeing an ambiguous visual image as the interpretation they were motivated to see. Our results suggest that arousal biases perceptual judgments towards desirable percepts, and that modulating arousal levels could be a promising approach in reducing motivational biases in decision-making.
Title: Pupil-linked arousal biases evidence accumulation towards desirable percepts during perceptual decision-making
Description:
Abstract People are biased towards seeing outcomes they are motivated to see.
The arousal system coordinates the body’s response to motivationally significant events, and is well positioned to regulate motivational effects on sensory perception.
However, it remains unclear whether arousal would enhance or reduce motivational biases.
Here we measured pupil dilation as a measure of arousal while participants performed a visual categorization task.
We used monetary bonuses to motivate participants to see one category over another.
Even though the reward-maximizing strategy was to perform the task accurately, participants were more likely to report seeing the motivationally desirable category.
Furthermore, higher arousal levels were associated with making motivationally biased responses.
Analyses using computational models suggest that arousal enhanced motivational effects by biasing evidence accumulation in favor of motivationally desirable percepts.
These results suggest heightened arousal biases people towards what they want to see and away from an objective representation of the environment.
Statement of Relevance When confronted with an event of motivational significance (e.
g.
, an opportunity to earn a huge reward), people often experience a strong arousal response that includes increased sweating, faster heart-rate and larger pupils.
Does this arousal response help individuals make more accurate decisions, or does it instead bias and impair decision-making? This work examines the effects of arousal on how people decide what they see when they are motivated to see a particular outcome.
We found that heightened arousal, as measured by larger pupils, was associated with a bias in how participants accumulated sensory evidence to make their decisions.
As a result, participants became more likely to report seeing an ambiguous visual image as the interpretation they were motivated to see.
Our results suggest that arousal biases perceptual judgments towards desirable percepts, and that modulating arousal levels could be a promising approach in reducing motivational biases in decision-making.

Related Results

Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience findings regarding assumptions of the evidence accumulation model
Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience findings regarding assumptions of the evidence accumulation model
The evidence accumulation model is a widely used cognitive model of human decision-making, which assumes that decision-makers continuously gather and integrate information into evi...
Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience findings regarding assumptions of the evidence accumulation model
Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience findings regarding assumptions of the evidence accumulation model
The evidence accumulation model is a widely used cognitive model of human decision-making, which assumes that decision-makers continuously gather and integrate information into evi...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Extending Levelt’s Propositions to perceptual multistability involving interocular grouping
Extending Levelt’s Propositions to perceptual multistability involving interocular grouping
Abstract Levelt’s Propositions have been a touchstone for experimental and modeling studies of perceptual multistability. We asked whether Levelt’s Propositions ext...
Shared and diverging neural dynamics underlying false and veridical perception
Shared and diverging neural dynamics underlying false and veridical perception
We often mistake visual noise for meaningful images, which sometimes appear to be as convincing as veridical percepts. This suggests that there is considerable overlap between the ...
Attention cueing in rivalry: insights from pupillometry
Attention cueing in rivalry: insights from pupillometry
Abstract We used pupillometry to evaluate the effects of attention cueing on perceptual bi-stability, as reported by adult human observers. Perceptual alternations ...
Pupil-associated states modulate excitability but not stimulus selectivity in primary auditory cortex
Pupil-associated states modulate excitability but not stimulus selectivity in primary auditory cortex
Abstract Recent research in mice indicates that luminance-independent fluctuations in pupil size predict variability in spontaneous and evoked activity of single ne...
Regulation of evidence accumulation by pupil-linked arousal processes
Regulation of evidence accumulation by pupil-linked arousal processes
Abstract Integrating evidence over time is crucial for effective decision making. For simple perceptual decisions, a large body of work suggests that humans and ani...

Back to Top