Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS NON-INVASIVE ARTERIAL PRESSURE (CNAP) MONITORING VERSUS INTERMITTENT NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE (NIBP) MONITORING FOR DETECTION OF HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION

View through CrossRef
Background and Aims:Hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section is common and, if undetected, may compromise uteroplacental perfusion. Intermittent non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring may miss or delay detection of hypotensive episodes. The continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor, based on the vascular unloading technique, provides beat-to-beat blood pressure values without arterial cannulation. We compared the ability of CNAP and intermittent oscillometric NIBP to detect hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.Methods:In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study, 50 healthy parturients of ASA physical status I–II undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were monitored simultaneously with NIBP (every 1 minute until delivery, then every 3 minutes) and CNAP(continuous, recorded every 10 seconds until delivery) from the time of subarachnoid block until delivery of the baby. Clinical decisions regarding vasopressor and fluid therapy were based solely on NIBP readings. Incidence and time of detection of hypotension, systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) differences between the two techniques, side effects, and neonatal outcome (APGAR score, umbilical vein pH) were recorded.Results:The incidence of hypotension detected was 18% with NIBP compared with 78% with CNAP (p<0.05). CNAP detected hypotension earlier than NIBP (mean time 1.87±0.52 min vs 2.66±0.86 min; p<0.05). CNAP recorded consistently and significantly lower SBP and MAP than NIBP at every time point studied (p<0.05), while DBP values were comparable between the two techniques. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 80% of NIBP-normotensive patients but in none of the CNAP-normotensive patients. APGAR scores and umbilical vein pH were comparable between hypotensive and normotensive mothers as classified by either technique.Conclusion: Intermittent NIBP monitoring at 1-minute intervals under-detects and delays detection of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section compared with continuous CNAP monitoring. CNAP may bea useful adjunct to routine intermittent monitoring in this high-risk, time-critical setting.
Title: COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS NON-INVASIVE ARTERIAL PRESSURE (CNAP) MONITORING VERSUS INTERMITTENT NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE (NIBP) MONITORING FOR DETECTION OF HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION
Description:
Background and Aims:Hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section is common and, if undetected, may compromise uteroplacental perfusion.
Intermittent non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring may miss or delay detection of hypotensive episodes.
The continuous non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor, based on the vascular unloading technique, provides beat-to-beat blood pressure values without arterial cannulation.
We compared the ability of CNAP and intermittent oscillometric NIBP to detect hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Methods:In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study, 50 healthy parturients of ASA physical status I–II undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were monitored simultaneously with NIBP (every 1 minute until delivery, then every 3 minutes) and CNAP(continuous, recorded every 10 seconds until delivery) from the time of subarachnoid block until delivery of the baby.
Clinical decisions regarding vasopressor and fluid therapy were based solely on NIBP readings.
Incidence and time of detection of hypotension, systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) differences between the two techniques, side effects, and neonatal outcome (APGAR score, umbilical vein pH) were recorded.
Results:The incidence of hypotension detected was 18% with NIBP compared with 78% with CNAP (p<0.
05).
CNAP detected hypotension earlier than NIBP (mean time 1.
87±0.
52 min vs 2.
66±0.
86 min; p<0.
05).
CNAP recorded consistently and significantly lower SBP and MAP than NIBP at every time point studied (p<0.
05), while DBP values were comparable between the two techniques.
Nausea and vomiting occurred in 80% of NIBP-normotensive patients but in none of the CNAP-normotensive patients.
APGAR scores and umbilical vein pH were comparable between hypotensive and normotensive mothers as classified by either technique.
Conclusion: Intermittent NIBP monitoring at 1-minute intervals under-detects and delays detection of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section compared with continuous CNAP monitoring.
CNAP may bea useful adjunct to routine intermittent monitoring in this high-risk, time-critical setting.

Related Results

“A Prospective Study On Complication During Spinal Anesthesia In Elective General Surgical Procedures”
“A Prospective Study On Complication During Spinal Anesthesia In Elective General Surgical Procedures”
Background of the Study: Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly employed regional anesthetic techniques for elective surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen, pelvis,...
Feasibility of Hypotension Prediction Index-Guided Monitoring for Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Feasibility of Hypotension Prediction Index-Guided Monitoring for Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Hypotension following epidural labor analgesia (ELA) is its most common complication, affecting approximately 20% of patients and posing risks to both maternal and feta...
Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia
Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia
BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia is frequently used in surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen and extremities, however, the occurrence of hypotension remains a co...
Evaluation of perfusion index to predict hypotension in lower segment caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
Evaluation of perfusion index to predict hypotension in lower segment caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
Background: Spinal Anaesthesia is the most popular choice for elective caesarean section. Both general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia are acceptable techniques for anaesthesi...

Back to Top