Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Web 2.0 interactivity in open access repositories

View through CrossRef
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of open access (OA) repositories that have embraced Web 2.0 technologies. The main focus of the paper is to explore the occurrence of Web 2.0 tools used in the open repositories. Design/methodology/approach – Repositories having English as one of the interface/content languages and indexed in Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR) were selected and analyzed under different parameters. Findings – A total of 1,499 open access repositories having English as one of the interface/content languages (75.82 percent of total OA repositories) are developed from 81 nations and only 61 countries have most of their repositories Web 2.0 enabled. About 57 percent (804) repositories make use of Web 2.0 tool/s, 43 percent (608) have yet to avail benefits of Web 2.0 tools while 5.8 percent remain inaccessible (87) during the study period. Though the USA leads in terms of OA repositories, the percentage of Web 2.0 enabled repositories is higher for the UK (75.27 percent) as compared to the USA (51.08 percent). Really Simple Syndication (RSS), a syndication tool, is found in the majority of repositories (736, 91.54 percent) followed respectively by Social Bookmarking and ATOM (syndication tool) in 228 and 160 repositories Research limitations/implications – Repositories have to develop a more productive Web 2.0 outlook in order to converge with an interactive learning model. A follow-up study can explore the use of Web 2.0 tools in open access repositories. The impact of Web 2.0 tools on the associated activities of the users as well as repository administrators can also be carried on. How Web 2.0 tools have helped to improve the services of the repositories and how they have influenced the information seeking behavior of users in the open access repositories can also be researched. Originality/value – The research is the first of its kind and can act as an opener to the issues related to use of Web 2.0 in open repositories.
Title: Web 2.0 interactivity in open access repositories
Description:
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of open access (OA) repositories that have embraced Web 2.
0 technologies.
The main focus of the paper is to explore the occurrence of Web 2.
0 tools used in the open repositories.
Design/methodology/approach – Repositories having English as one of the interface/content languages and indexed in Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR) were selected and analyzed under different parameters.
Findings – A total of 1,499 open access repositories having English as one of the interface/content languages (75.
82 percent of total OA repositories) are developed from 81 nations and only 61 countries have most of their repositories Web 2.
0 enabled.
About 57 percent (804) repositories make use of Web 2.
0 tool/s, 43 percent (608) have yet to avail benefits of Web 2.
0 tools while 5.
8 percent remain inaccessible (87) during the study period.
Though the USA leads in terms of OA repositories, the percentage of Web 2.
0 enabled repositories is higher for the UK (75.
27 percent) as compared to the USA (51.
08 percent).
Really Simple Syndication (RSS), a syndication tool, is found in the majority of repositories (736, 91.
54 percent) followed respectively by Social Bookmarking and ATOM (syndication tool) in 228 and 160 repositories Research limitations/implications – Repositories have to develop a more productive Web 2.
0 outlook in order to converge with an interactive learning model.
A follow-up study can explore the use of Web 2.
0 tools in open access repositories.
The impact of Web 2.
0 tools on the associated activities of the users as well as repository administrators can also be carried on.
How Web 2.
0 tools have helped to improve the services of the repositories and how they have influenced the information seeking behavior of users in the open access repositories can also be researched.
Originality/value – The research is the first of its kind and can act as an opener to the issues related to use of Web 2.
0 in open repositories.

Related Results

Connecting Repositories to one Integrated Domain
Connecting Repositories to one Integrated Domain
Information is the new commodity in the global economy and trustworthy digital repositories will be the key pillars within this new ecosystem. The value of this digital information...
Analysis of a Mobile Learning Adoption Model for Learning Improvement Based on Students’ Perception
Analysis of a Mobile Learning Adoption Model for Learning Improvement Based on Students’ Perception
Aim/Purpose: This identifies the factors that influence the application of mobile learning in order to improve the student learning process at universities in Indonesia based on th...
Crosswalk among Prominent Open Research Data Repositories
Crosswalk among Prominent Open Research Data Repositories
Open Access is a synergised global movement using Internet to provide equal access to knowledge that once hid behind the subscription paywalls. Many new models for scholarly commun...
Web Mining for Public E-Services Personalization
Web Mining for Public E-Services Personalization
Over the last decade, we have witnessed an explosive growth in the information available on the Web. Today, Web browsers provide easy access to myriad sources of text and multimedi...
Web Mining for Public E-Services Personalization
Web Mining for Public E-Services Personalization
Over the last decade, we have witnessed an explosive growth in the information available on the Web. Today, Web browsers provide easy access to myriad sources of text and multimedi...
IRUS-UK: Improving understanding of the value and impact of institutional repositories
IRUS-UK: Improving understanding of the value and impact of institutional repositories
>> See video of presentation (21 min.) Many educational institutions have repositories for research outputs. The number of items available through institutional repositories ...

Back to Top