Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) is the most common surgical method for lumbar fusion surgery, and pedicle screws(PS)can provide effective fixation strength in normal bone. However, pedicle screws are prone to loosening in osteoporotic patients. cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation and cement augmentation pedicle screw(CAPS) fixation are often used to reduce the risk of loosening. Although several studies are reported that the pullout strength of CBT screws or CAPS screws are higher than PS,There are no relevant studies on different internal fixation stress analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the stresses of different fixation methods and analyze the stresses of different internal fixation systems through finite element analysis.Methods: Five finite element models were established and tested by simulating PLIF surgery at L4/5. They included: (1) normal model (2) osteoporosis model (3) pedicle screw model; (4) cement augmentation pedicle screw(CAPS)model; (5) cortical bone trajectory (CBT) model. The range of motion (ROM), stress of fusion cage and screw-rod system of different models were analyzed by simulating flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation and right rotation movements through software.Results: The ROM of the osteoporosis model was increased compared with the normal bone, and the osteoporosis was increased by 5.3%, 17.6%, 11.5%, 11.3%, 7.5%, and 8.3% compared with the normal model during flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation. After fixation, the ROM decreased, but the difference was not significant between the different fixation models. The stress of the screw-rods is the minimum one in the CAPS group. the PS group is the middle one, and stress of the CBT group is max. The cage stress is the minimum in the CAPS group which is slightly smaller than the cage stress in the PS group. the cage stress was the max in the CBT group.Conclusion: PLIF can decrease the ROM of lumbar vertebra and fusion segment in osteoporosis, but different fixation methods have little effect on ROM. However, there was a great difference in the stress of implant, with the least stress in the CAPS group, the second in the PS group, and the greatest stress in the CBT. The same is true for Cage stress. At the same time, the maximum stress zone to occur at the screw-rod junction, while the maximum stress of cage occurs at the position in contact with the endplate. The study has guiding significance for clinical practice.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Influence of Different Fixed System in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Fusion:A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background:Posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) is the most common surgical method for lumbar fusion surgery, and pedicle screws(PS)can provide effective fixation strength in normal bone.
However, pedicle screws are prone to loosening in osteoporotic patients.
cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation and cement augmentation pedicle screw(CAPS) fixation are often used to reduce the risk of loosening.
Although several studies are reported that the pullout strength of CBT screws or CAPS screws are higher than PS,There are no relevant studies on different internal fixation stress analysis.
The purpose of this study was to compare the stresses of different fixation methods and analyze the stresses of different internal fixation systems through finite element analysis.
Methods: Five finite element models were established and tested by simulating PLIF surgery at L4/5.
They included: (1) normal model (2) osteoporosis model (3) pedicle screw model; (4) cement augmentation pedicle screw(CAPS)model; (5) cortical bone trajectory (CBT) model.
The range of motion (ROM), stress of fusion cage and screw-rod system of different models were analyzed by simulating flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation and right rotation movements through software.
Results: The ROM of the osteoporosis model was increased compared with the normal bone, and the osteoporosis was increased by 5.
3%, 17.
6%, 11.
5%, 11.
3%, 7.
5%, and 8.
3% compared with the normal model during flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation.
After fixation, the ROM decreased, but the difference was not significant between the different fixation models.
The stress of the screw-rods is the minimum one in the CAPS group.
the PS group is the middle one, and stress of the CBT group is max.
The cage stress is the minimum in the CAPS group which is slightly smaller than the cage stress in the PS group.
the cage stress was the max in the CBT group.
Conclusion: PLIF can decrease the ROM of lumbar vertebra and fusion segment in osteoporosis, but different fixation methods have little effect on ROM.
However, there was a great difference in the stress of implant, with the least stress in the CAPS group, the second in the PS group, and the greatest stress in the CBT.
The same is true for Cage stress.
At the same time, the maximum stress zone to occur at the screw-rod junction, while the maximum stress of cage occurs at the position in contact with the endplate.
The study has guiding significance for clinical practice.
Related Results
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award ceremony for 2009 and 2010 award winners was held during the 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference in Daejeon. This time, both 2009 and 2010 award winners w...
STRESS MARKERS ON THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE
STRESS MARKERS ON THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE
Woven sarong craftsmen in Wedani Village in carrying out their work activities make sarongs using non- machine looms. Work starts from 07.00 to 16.30 for 6 working days a week by p...
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Abstract
Background Purpose This retrospective study was applied to investigate the morphology characteristics of the spine and pelvis in patients with congenital spinal s...
The morphology and incidence of the accessory foramen transversarium in human dried cervical vertebrae as well as their clinical significance in the Eastern Indian population
The morphology and incidence of the accessory foramen transversarium in human dried cervical vertebrae as well as their clinical significance in the Eastern Indian population
Background: A characteristic feature of the cervical vertebrae (C1–C7) is the presence of a foramen tranversarium on the transverse process. The cervical vertebrae are the smallest...
Midsagittal Anatomy of Lumbar Lordosis in Adult Egyptians: MRI Study
Midsagittal Anatomy of Lumbar Lordosis in Adult Egyptians: MRI Study
Despite the increasing recognition of the functional and clinical importance of lumbar lordosis, little is known about its description, particularly in Egypt. At the same time, mag...
Incidence of Anti-osteoporosis Diagnosis and Treatment After Distal Radius Fractures
Incidence of Anti-osteoporosis Diagnosis and Treatment After Distal Radius Fractures
Introduction: There is still lack of adequate diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in elderly patients. Hand surgeons can prevent secondary osteoporotic fractures when treating ...
Minimally invasive transabdominal preperitoneal repair of incisional lumbar hernia
Minimally invasive transabdominal preperitoneal repair of incisional lumbar hernia
Introduction: A lumbar hernia is a rare type of abdominal wall defect by anatomic location. It can be primary in origin over the lumbar triangles that can be categorized into super...

