Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rational Choice and Freudian Accounts of Cooperation

View through CrossRef
In this paper we discuss one of the richest psychological conceptions of individuals – that offered by Sigmund Freud – in relation to rational choice theory. The purpose is twofold. First, we use coordination games to translate some of Freud's ideas into a choice theoretic framework; including the three central components of Freudian psychoanalysis, the id, ego, and superego. Second, we use this framework to suggest a deeper and richer psychological characterization of the individual within the choice theoretic framework. Freud's more complex view of individuals provides a potentially deeper understanding of social interaction within the rational choice approach. This paper therefore contributes to psychology and economics within the larger field of behavioral economics We focus on Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents (1930) to discuss both the rational choice and the Freudian conception of the relationship between the individual and society, to note points of commonality and divergence, and to understand the consequences of these differences for models of social behavior. Freud makes two theoretical contributions in this work. The first parallels recent scholarship in rational choice in discussing the relationship between individual behavior and social outcomes. Both approaches emphasize, for example, that individuals bear a cost for participating in schemes of social cooperation and interaction. In Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud goes beyond this idea, attempting to show the implications of his interpretation of society for the individual, an analysis absent from rational choice analysis. Freud argues that individuals bear a psychological cost in fulfilling the demands and obligations of civilization. Participation in society requires that individuals suppress their desires in order to realize the gains from cooperation. The implications from the second part of Freud’s analysis allow us to study the limits of the standard rational choice conception of the individual.
Title: Rational Choice and Freudian Accounts of Cooperation
Description:
In this paper we discuss one of the richest psychological conceptions of individuals – that offered by Sigmund Freud – in relation to rational choice theory.
The purpose is twofold.
First, we use coordination games to translate some of Freud's ideas into a choice theoretic framework; including the three central components of Freudian psychoanalysis, the id, ego, and superego.
Second, we use this framework to suggest a deeper and richer psychological characterization of the individual within the choice theoretic framework.
Freud's more complex view of individuals provides a potentially deeper understanding of social interaction within the rational choice approach.
This paper therefore contributes to psychology and economics within the larger field of behavioral economics We focus on Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents (1930) to discuss both the rational choice and the Freudian conception of the relationship between the individual and society, to note points of commonality and divergence, and to understand the consequences of these differences for models of social behavior.
Freud makes two theoretical contributions in this work.
The first parallels recent scholarship in rational choice in discussing the relationship between individual behavior and social outcomes.
Both approaches emphasize, for example, that individuals bear a cost for participating in schemes of social cooperation and interaction.
In Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud goes beyond this idea, attempting to show the implications of his interpretation of society for the individual, an analysis absent from rational choice analysis.
Freud argues that individuals bear a psychological cost in fulfilling the demands and obligations of civilization.
Participation in society requires that individuals suppress their desires in order to realize the gains from cooperation.
The implications from the second part of Freud’s analysis allow us to study the limits of the standard rational choice conception of the individual.

Related Results

Alts and Automediality: Compartmentalising the Self through Multiple Social Media Profiles
Alts and Automediality: Compartmentalising the Self through Multiple Social Media Profiles
IntroductionAlt, or alternative, accounts are secondary profiles people use in addition to a main account on a social media platform. They are a kind of automediation, a way of rep...
School Choice in Bangladesh
School Choice in Bangladesh
This report presents findings from a study of School Choice in Bangladesh, conducted in four districts of Bangladesh in 2008. The objective of the study was to analyse household ch...
Freudian Whimsy in William Shakespeare's King Lear
Freudian Whimsy in William Shakespeare's King Lear
William Shakespeare's King Lear is a play where one finds an apparently simple story of Lear, king of Britain, and his three daughters. However, it has gained immense popularity si...
Voting Choice and Rational Choice
Voting Choice and Rational Choice
Rational choice theory may seem like a separate theoretical approach with its own forbidding mathematics. However, the central assumptions of rational choice theory are very simila...
Metropolitan cooperation, theory and practice: Looking at Vancouver, BC, Canada
Metropolitan cooperation, theory and practice: Looking at Vancouver, BC, Canada
In North America, why and how municipalities in large metropolitan areas cooperate is a pressing question. Both in Canada and the United States, the literature has been greatly inf...
Conceptual Reframing of Science and Technology Development Cooperation
Conceptual Reframing of Science and Technology Development Cooperation
Purpose: Despite the crucial role that science and technology (S&T) have played in development cooperation, the concept of “science and technology development cooperation” rema...

Back to Top