Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nineteen

View through CrossRef
In this article I present the story of Dr Rashad Khalifa, a US-based Egyptian scientist who claimed to have scientifically shown how the text of the Quran was the immutable speech of God. He did this by means of computer-based calculations that showed how the number 19 was embedded in the formal structure of the Quran, thereby indicating a superhuman level of coding. I locate such efforts at the conjuncture of the long history of textual polemics that aim at undermining religious traditions by exposing errors within authoritative texts, the history of magical squares within Islamic sciences, and the more recent history of the subfield of Islam and science that attempts to study the Quran to show how it forecast scientific discoveries. I suggest that Dr Khalifa was attempting to definitively address the aspect of doubt that accompanies written texts, for which he elicited mixed reactions from a wide audience of Muslims. In this instance, tracking the fate of a number through a man’s life suggests how some doubts may not be addressable within the rubric of scientific facts.
Title: Nineteen
Description:
In this article I present the story of Dr Rashad Khalifa, a US-based Egyptian scientist who claimed to have scientifically shown how the text of the Quran was the immutable speech of God.
He did this by means of computer-based calculations that showed how the number 19 was embedded in the formal structure of the Quran, thereby indicating a superhuman level of coding.
I locate such efforts at the conjuncture of the long history of textual polemics that aim at undermining religious traditions by exposing errors within authoritative texts, the history of magical squares within Islamic sciences, and the more recent history of the subfield of Islam and science that attempts to study the Quran to show how it forecast scientific discoveries.
I suggest that Dr Khalifa was attempting to definitively address the aspect of doubt that accompanies written texts, for which he elicited mixed reactions from a wide audience of Muslims.
In this instance, tracking the fate of a number through a man’s life suggests how some doubts may not be addressable within the rubric of scientific facts.

Related Results

‘The few cubic centimetres inside your skull’: a neurological reading of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four
‘The few cubic centimetres inside your skull’: a neurological reading of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four
Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), George Orwell’s political satire on state surveillance and mind control, was written between 1946 and 1948, at a time when new thinking in forensic psy...
‘Any Dark Saying’: Louis MacNeice in the Nineteen Fifties
‘Any Dark Saying’: Louis MacNeice in the Nineteen Fifties
The contours of Louis MacNeice's career are rarely contested: from the high point of his nineteen thirties work, reaching a crescendo with Autumn Journal (1939), he drifted into a ...
Popular Music and the Modernist Dystopia:Brave New WorldandNineteen Eighty-Four
Popular Music and the Modernist Dystopia:Brave New WorldandNineteen Eighty-Four
This essay explores musical references in Brave New World and Nineteen Eighty-Four, including music imagery and allusions to popular songs of the 1920s and 1940s. Huxley used the p...
The Dystopian Beyond: George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four
The Dystopian Beyond: George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four
Stretching behind the literal or metaphorical frontier, the beyond—regardless of its ontological status—constitutes, this article argues, a necessary complementary component of any...
Orwell on Jura: Locating Nineteen Eighty-Four
Orwell on Jura: Locating Nineteen Eighty-Four
George Orwell's biographers have been divided about his move to the island of Jura in the last years of his life. Some have seen it as a refuge from the trials of London life durin...
“How could you tell how much of it was lies?” The controversy of truth in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four
“How could you tell how much of it was lies?” The controversy of truth in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four
Abstract This article considers the controversial nature of truth in George Orwell's Nineteen Eight-Four, both within the novel itself and in critical responses to i...
What’s Happening to the Weather? Australian Climate, H. C. Russell, and the Theory of a Nineteen-Year Cycle
What’s Happening to the Weather? Australian Climate, H. C. Russell, and the Theory of a Nineteen-Year Cycle
The theory of a nineteen-year climate cycle put forward by acclaimed New SouthWales Government Astronomer Henry Chamberlain Russell is arguably one of his least successful contribu...
The New Aesthetic of the Late Nineteen Twenties Reconsidering the Periodization of the Interwar Avant-Gardes
The New Aesthetic of the Late Nineteen Twenties Reconsidering the Periodization of the Interwar Avant-Gardes
AbstractThe avant-gardes of the nineteen twenties are discussed in the art historical literature as the art products of a rarely upbeat decade, which featured great utopian aspirat...

Recent Results

“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement
“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement
AbstractThomas Henry Huxley and Charles Darwin discovered in 1857 that they had a fundamental disagreement about biological classification. Darwin believed that the natural system ...

Back to Top