Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Screening in health impact assessment: issues and practice in France

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Health impact assessment (HIA) is a method aimed at anticipating the potential effects of proposals on health prior to their implementation in order to include health issues in decisions made outside the health sector. It is structured in several steps. The first one (screening), aimed to decide if a full assessment is required or not, is poorly documented. In France, the interest shown for HIA has led to a growing number of experiments, which questions the quality of practices linked to this step and its capacity to fulfil its purpose. This study describes how screening is implemented, explores the main issues at this stage, the decision-making process and to what extent it conditions the HIA's success. Methods All HIAs undertaken between 2011 and 2019 were listed in order to provide a picture of the process. Then, we focused on the 3 most involved regions to describe the screening process (reports, interviews, observation). Drawing on quality standards and literature review, we built an analytical framework to analyze practices, the interface with other approaches, the influence of the local context and the HIA's success factors. Results 59 HIAs were identified. Among them, 54 have gone beyond screening. HIAs are applied to land use planning (72%,) policies (19%), equipments (9%) and are carried out by public organisations (37%), private firms (35%), universities (15%), municipalities (13%). 11 regions (out of 18) conducted at least one HIA and practice varies significantly across regions. Case studies in 3 regions (36 HIAs) show that screening length and depth vary greatly. Its features depend on political commitment to HIA, advocacy for HIA, guidance, relationship with local authorities, technical skills. Overall, screening is more dedicated to promote HIA and select a pilot project than to study the HIA's relevance and feasibility. Conclusions Since screening is methodologically poorly underpinned, it weakens HIA's quality and efficiency whatever its duration. Key messages Screening step is key to raise decision-makers’ awareness of the consequences of their engagement in HIA. Screening allows to ensure that HIA is the relevant method for the project and the conditions are met to gain its utility.
Title: Screening in health impact assessment: issues and practice in France
Description:
Abstract Background Health impact assessment (HIA) is a method aimed at anticipating the potential effects of proposals on health prior to their implementation in order to include health issues in decisions made outside the health sector.
It is structured in several steps.
The first one (screening), aimed to decide if a full assessment is required or not, is poorly documented.
In France, the interest shown for HIA has led to a growing number of experiments, which questions the quality of practices linked to this step and its capacity to fulfil its purpose.
This study describes how screening is implemented, explores the main issues at this stage, the decision-making process and to what extent it conditions the HIA's success.
Methods All HIAs undertaken between 2011 and 2019 were listed in order to provide a picture of the process.
Then, we focused on the 3 most involved regions to describe the screening process (reports, interviews, observation).
Drawing on quality standards and literature review, we built an analytical framework to analyze practices, the interface with other approaches, the influence of the local context and the HIA's success factors.
Results 59 HIAs were identified.
Among them, 54 have gone beyond screening.
HIAs are applied to land use planning (72%,) policies (19%), equipments (9%) and are carried out by public organisations (37%), private firms (35%), universities (15%), municipalities (13%).
11 regions (out of 18) conducted at least one HIA and practice varies significantly across regions.
Case studies in 3 regions (36 HIAs) show that screening length and depth vary greatly.
Its features depend on political commitment to HIA, advocacy for HIA, guidance, relationship with local authorities, technical skills.
Overall, screening is more dedicated to promote HIA and select a pilot project than to study the HIA's relevance and feasibility.
Conclusions Since screening is methodologically poorly underpinned, it weakens HIA's quality and efficiency whatever its duration.
Key messages Screening step is key to raise decision-makers’ awareness of the consequences of their engagement in HIA.
Screening allows to ensure that HIA is the relevant method for the project and the conditions are met to gain its utility.

Related Results

Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health (ASRH) is crucial for the physical, emotional, and social well-being of adolescents. The paper aims to identify the barriers to ASRH in Ghana ...
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundDespite a remarkable progress in the reduction of global rate of maternal mortality, cervical cancer has been identified as the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mo...
Comparing Artificial Intelligence versus Human Screening in Systematic Reviews
Comparing Artificial Intelligence versus Human Screening in Systematic Reviews
Abstract Introduction Systematic reviews are essential for informing health policy and practice. Artificia...
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED]Product Name - Bridport Health Ingredients - Milk Thistle, Beetroot, Artichoke Extract & More. Category - Liver Support Supplement Main Benefits - Helps Protect The ...

Back to Top