Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.
Methods
A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were conducted, comparing segmentectomy and lobotomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
Results
The analysis incorporated 18 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 17 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent. Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.8 months after surgery. OS:HR = 1.14, 95%CI(0.97,1.32), P = 0.10; DFS:HR = 1.13, 95%CI(0.91,1.41), P = 0.27; RFS:HR = 0.95, 95%CI(0.81,1.12), P = 0.54.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.
Research Square Platform LLC
Title: Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background
The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.
Methods
A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were conducted, comparing segmentectomy and lobotomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022.
The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies.
Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
Results
The analysis incorporated 18 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 17 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent.
Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.
8 months after surgery.
OS:HR = 1.
14, 95%CI(0.
97,1.
32), P = 0.
10; DFS:HR = 1.
13, 95%CI(0.
91,1.
41), P = 0.
27; RFS:HR = 0.
95, 95%CI(0.
81,1.
12), P = 0.
54.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group.
Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.
Related Results
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Objective: Surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for bronchiectasis in patients who present with hemoptysis or suppuration, as well as in those who do not respond ...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Compensatory Lung Growth After Resection in a Murine Lobectomy Model
Compensatory Lung Growth After Resection in a Murine Lobectomy Model
Abstract
Background: Compensatory lung growth after resection is observed in clinical practice, yet its underlying mechanisms and pathology remain unclear. To inv...

