Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

From Horkheimer to Honneth and back again: A comment on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique

View through CrossRef
This article comments on Asger Sørensen’s stimulating book “Capitalism, Alienation and Critique”. The article argues that Sørensen overlooks an important methodological contiunuity between Max Horkheimer’s and Axel Honneth’s work: namely, the model of immanent critique, to which both remain committed. Moreover, through a critical discussion of Honneth’s method of normative reconstruction, the article argues that globalized capitalism represents a serious methodological challenge not only to Honneth’s work, but to the Frankfurt School model of immanent crituque as such.
Title: From Horkheimer to Honneth and back again: A comment on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique
Description:
This article comments on Asger Sørensen’s stimulating book “Capitalism, Alienation and Critique”.
The article argues that Sørensen overlooks an important methodological contiunuity between Max Horkheimer’s and Axel Honneth’s work: namely, the model of immanent critique, to which both remain committed.
Moreover, through a critical discussion of Honneth’s method of normative reconstruction, the article argues that globalized capitalism represents a serious methodological challenge not only to Honneth’s work, but to the Frankfurt School model of immanent crituque as such.

Related Results

Critical theory and the future of humanity: A reply to Asger Sørensen
Critical theory and the future of humanity: A reply to Asger Sørensen
The article entails a critical discussion of the book Capitalism, Alienation and Critique by Asger Sørensen. Like Sørensen’s book, it stresses the importance of the first generatio...
Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique
Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique
This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger S?rensen?s arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize S?rensen?s overarching understandi...
Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history
Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history
Building on historical narrative and social-theoretical analysis, Fraser explores the place of second-wave feminism in relation to three specific moments in the history of capitali...
Compulsory Creativity: A Critique of Cognitive Capitalism
Compulsory Creativity: A Critique of Cognitive Capitalism
Contemporary capitalism can be labelled cognitive capitalism. In this dynamic, demanding and extremely transformative mode of production, knowledge becomes a strategic force of pro...
Sørensen’s Bataille: Notes on the ‘apolitical’
Sørensen’s Bataille: Notes on the ‘apolitical’
In Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, part of the development of Asger S?rensen?s overall argument is a disagreement with Georges Bataille. The crux of the argument is that...
La narrativité critique
La narrativité critique
Cet article veut envisager la narrativité critique du double point de vue de la composante narrative de la critique littéraire et de la dimension critique du récit. Au moyen d'exem...
'Critique' as Technology of the Self
'Critique' as Technology of the Self
This inquiry is situated at the intersection of two enigmas. The first is the enigma of the status of Kant's practice of critique, which has been the subject of heated debate since...
Foreign ideas, native spaces: Crime and Punishment in recent Asian cinema
Foreign ideas, native spaces: Crime and Punishment in recent Asian cinema
In recent years, Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment has furnished source material for two major Asian film directors: Darezhan Omirbaev (Student [2012]) and Lav Diaz (Norte, ...

Back to Top