Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The metabolic profile of lean patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus

View through CrossRef
Summary Central obesity is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) independent of acid reflux. However, about a quarter of patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and EAC have a normal body mass index (BMI). One hypothesis is that chronic systemic inflammation is as critical to the cancer pathway than the BMI alone. Therefore, we hypothesized that lean patients with BE/EAC would have a high prevalence of metabolic diseases. We aimed to compare metabolic diseases among lean patients with BE/EAC and overweight/obese BE/EAC and lean control without BE/EAC. We performed a propensity score–matched case–control study including patients with BE/EAC and a control group without BE/EAC from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). The groups were compared using chi-square χ 2 and Student t-test as appropriate. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to compare the association with metabolic diseases. We included a total of 2504 patients (631 EAC, 621 BE, and 1252 controls). A quarter of patients (24.6%) with BE/EAC were lean. When compared to controls without BE/EAC, lean patients with BE were more likely to have diabetes (32.2% vs. 11.2%, P < 0.001) and hyperlipidemia (76.2% vs. 53%, P < 0.001). When comparing lean EAC patients to controls without BE/EAC, lean patients had a higher association with smoking (73.3% vs. 58.6%, P: 0.002) and diabetes (18.7% vs. 11.2%, P: 0.03). When compared to overweight/obese BE patients, lean BE were less likely to have NASH (7.7% vs. 20.3%, P: 0.001), diabetes (32.3% vs. 42.1%, P: 0.03), hyperlipidemia (77.2% vs. 87%, P: 0.003), and metabolic syndrome (24% vs. 54%, P < 0.001). Similarly, when compared to overweight/obese patients with EAC, lean EAC patients were less likely to have NASH (0% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.001), diabetes (18.7% vs. 34.1%, P < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (37.3% vs. 51.8%, P: 0.002), hypertension (37.3% vs. 55.3%, P < 0.001), and metabolic syndrome (8% vs. 37.6%, P < 0.001). A quarter of patients with BE/EAC are lean. Although lean BE/EAC patients have a more favorable metabolic profile compared to overweight/obese BE/EAC patients, diabetes and smoking are more common among lean patients with EAC compared to lean controls. The higher association with smoking and diabetes among lean EAC challenges traditional risk factor paradigms, suggesting a significant role for insulin resistance and chronic inflammation in EAC pathogenesis, especially in patients without typical risk factors. BMI-determined obesity may need to be supplemented with inflammatory metabolic diseases to improve assessment of BE/EAC risk in lean patients.
Title: The metabolic profile of lean patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus
Description:
Summary Central obesity is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) independent of acid reflux.
However, about a quarter of patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and EAC have a normal body mass index (BMI).
One hypothesis is that chronic systemic inflammation is as critical to the cancer pathway than the BMI alone.
Therefore, we hypothesized that lean patients with BE/EAC would have a high prevalence of metabolic diseases.
We aimed to compare metabolic diseases among lean patients with BE/EAC and overweight/obese BE/EAC and lean control without BE/EAC.
We performed a propensity score–matched case–control study including patients with BE/EAC and a control group without BE/EAC from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP).
The groups were compared using chi-square χ 2 and Student t-test as appropriate.
Adjusted logistic regression models were used to compare the association with metabolic diseases.
We included a total of 2504 patients (631 EAC, 621 BE, and 1252 controls).
A quarter of patients (24.
6%) with BE/EAC were lean.
When compared to controls without BE/EAC, lean patients with BE were more likely to have diabetes (32.
2% vs.
11.
2%, P < 0.
001) and hyperlipidemia (76.
2% vs.
53%, P < 0.
001).
When comparing lean EAC patients to controls without BE/EAC, lean patients had a higher association with smoking (73.
3% vs.
58.
6%, P: 0.
002) and diabetes (18.
7% vs.
11.
2%, P: 0.
03).
When compared to overweight/obese BE patients, lean BE were less likely to have NASH (7.
7% vs.
20.
3%, P: 0.
001), diabetes (32.
3% vs.
42.
1%, P: 0.
03), hyperlipidemia (77.
2% vs.
87%, P: 0.
003), and metabolic syndrome (24% vs.
54%, P < 0.
001).
Similarly, when compared to overweight/obese patients with EAC, lean EAC patients were less likely to have NASH (0% vs.
15.
5%, P < 0.
001), diabetes (18.
7% vs.
34.
1%, P < 0.
001), hyperlipidemia (37.
3% vs.
51.
8%, P: 0.
002), hypertension (37.
3% vs.
55.
3%, P < 0.
001), and metabolic syndrome (8% vs.
37.
6%, P < 0.
001).
A quarter of patients with BE/EAC are lean.
Although lean BE/EAC patients have a more favorable metabolic profile compared to overweight/obese BE/EAC patients, diabetes and smoking are more common among lean patients with EAC compared to lean controls.
The higher association with smoking and diabetes among lean EAC challenges traditional risk factor paradigms, suggesting a significant role for insulin resistance and chronic inflammation in EAC pathogenesis, especially in patients without typical risk factors.
BMI-determined obesity may need to be supplemented with inflammatory metabolic diseases to improve assessment of BE/EAC risk in lean patients.

Related Results

[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice Reviews: Is This Weight Loss Juice 100% Natural & Safe To Drink? v1
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice Reviews: Is This Weight Loss Juice 100% Natural & Safe To Drink? v1
[RETRACTED]Hello people. In this post, I am sharing my Ikaria Lean Belly Juice reviews based on my own experience. Many consider this formula to be a revolutionary solution for wei...
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice Reviews: Is This Weight Loss Juice 100% Natural & Safe To Drink? v1
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice Reviews: Is This Weight Loss Juice 100% Natural & Safe To Drink? v1
[RETRACTED]Hello people. In this post, I am sharing my Ikaria Lean Belly Juice reviews based on my own experience. Many consider this formula to be a revolutionary solution for wei...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice - How To Lose Stomach Fat? v1
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice - How To Lose Stomach Fat? v1
[RETRACTED]➢ Product Name — Ikaria Lean Belly Juice ➢ Category — Weight Loss ➢ Side-Effects — NA ➢ Benefits— Fat Burn and Weight Loss ➢ Availability — Online ➢ Rating — ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ➢ Off...
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice - How To Lose Stomach Fat? v1
[RETRACTED] Ikaria Lean Belly Juice - How To Lose Stomach Fat? v1
[RETRACTED]➢ Product Name — Ikaria Lean Belly Juice ➢ Category — Weight Loss ➢ Side-Effects — NA ➢ Benefits— Fat Burn and Weight Loss ➢ Availability — Online ➢ Rating — ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ➢ Off...
Adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in barrett`s esophagus: critical analysis of risk factors and of surveillance protocols
Adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in barrett`s esophagus: critical analysis of risk factors and of surveillance protocols
BACKGROUND: Identification of epidemiological risk factors in Barrett's esophagus resulting in dysplasia and adenocarcinoma and its impact on prevention and early detection. AIMS: ...
Nyelőcső-adenocarcinoma.
Nyelőcső-adenocarcinoma.
Összefoglaló. Az 1970-es évek előtt a nyelőcsőrákok csupán 1–3%-a volt adenocarcinoma. A 70-es évek közepétől a nyelőcső-adenocarcinoma mutatta a ...
Barrett Esophagus
Barrett Esophagus
Barrett esophagus is the condition in which normal stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by metaplastic columnar epithelium, which may predispose to developme...

Back to Top