Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI

View through CrossRef
Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI Background As part of a new initiative from the Global Epicenter of Mobility (GEM), organizations across many sectors in Detroit, MI, and surrounding counties are collaboratively investing in transforming the local legacy mobility industry into an inclusive advanced mobility cluster over the next 3 years. At the start of this initiative, in partnership with the research team at the Detroit Regional Partnership, a social network analysis was conducted to map the relationship between the foundational 24 organizations, the greater coalition, and their extended network to date. The organizations within this initiative were divided into 4 sectors that highlighted key differences in engagement This baseline map and relationship data, as well as key network analysis metrics, will be compared to future data collections over the coming years to track the initiative’s progress. Methods The original coalition (161 organizations) was identified by the local partner organization and data collection proceeded from September-December 2023 through survey completion. One or more representatives of coalition organizations were asked to identify their relationship to other members of the coalition using a 1-5 scale (Frey et al., 2006). Data were analyzed in R, and organization-level metrics, as well as centralized network-wide metrics, were produced for weighted betweenness, degree, and weighted degree centrality, as well as averages of connection strength. Maps were produced using KUMU software. Findings The mobility coalition consisted of 159 nodes and 7412 connections. Of those connections, 3763 (50.77%) had at least a level 1 connection strength, while 2319 (31.29%) had a connection strength of ≧ 3 (an active working relationship). The average connection strength for the network was 2.13. The coalition network was highly interconnected, with a clustering coefficient of 0.70 and a density of 0.59. Nonprofit and foundation organizations made up 47.5-50% of the top quartile by all centrality metrics while only making up 32.1% of the network. Corporate and private organizations made up 42.8% of the network and made up 68.42-82.50% of the bottom quartile across all metrics. The distribution of centrality scores of the corporate and private organizations was significantly lower than those of all other sectors within the network. These results illuminate a network that is highly interconnected, but in which not all sectors are engaging equally. These results are being used to plan and implement strategic interventions to foster new relationships and growth within the network. In addition to the 159 coalition organizations, respondents to the survey identified an additional 244 organizations as active participants within the Detroit region mobility space. A select number of these organizations will be added to the coalition as it becomes established within the Detroit region. These provide directions for future growth of the GEM initiative and the mobility ecosystem network and are examples of turning research into action.
Title: Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI
Description:
Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI Background As part of a new initiative from the Global Epicenter of Mobility (GEM), organizations across many sectors in Detroit, MI, and surrounding counties are collaboratively investing in transforming the local legacy mobility industry into an inclusive advanced mobility cluster over the next 3 years.
At the start of this initiative, in partnership with the research team at the Detroit Regional Partnership, a social network analysis was conducted to map the relationship between the foundational 24 organizations, the greater coalition, and their extended network to date.
The organizations within this initiative were divided into 4 sectors that highlighted key differences in engagement This baseline map and relationship data, as well as key network analysis metrics, will be compared to future data collections over the coming years to track the initiative’s progress.
Methods The original coalition (161 organizations) was identified by the local partner organization and data collection proceeded from September-December 2023 through survey completion.
One or more representatives of coalition organizations were asked to identify their relationship to other members of the coalition using a 1-5 scale (Frey et al.
, 2006).
Data were analyzed in R, and organization-level metrics, as well as centralized network-wide metrics, were produced for weighted betweenness, degree, and weighted degree centrality, as well as averages of connection strength.
Maps were produced using KUMU software.
Findings The mobility coalition consisted of 159 nodes and 7412 connections.
Of those connections, 3763 (50.
77%) had at least a level 1 connection strength, while 2319 (31.
29%) had a connection strength of ≧ 3 (an active working relationship).
The average connection strength for the network was 2.
13.
The coalition network was highly interconnected, with a clustering coefficient of 0.
70 and a density of 0.
59.
Nonprofit and foundation organizations made up 47.
5-50% of the top quartile by all centrality metrics while only making up 32.
1% of the network.
Corporate and private organizations made up 42.
8% of the network and made up 68.
42-82.
50% of the bottom quartile across all metrics.
The distribution of centrality scores of the corporate and private organizations was significantly lower than those of all other sectors within the network.
These results illuminate a network that is highly interconnected, but in which not all sectors are engaging equally.
These results are being used to plan and implement strategic interventions to foster new relationships and growth within the network.
In addition to the 159 coalition organizations, respondents to the survey identified an additional 244 organizations as active participants within the Detroit region mobility space.
A select number of these organizations will be added to the coalition as it becomes established within the Detroit region.
These provide directions for future growth of the GEM initiative and the mobility ecosystem network and are examples of turning research into action.

Related Results

Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI
Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI
Network Analysis of a Mobility Ecosystem in Detroit, MI Background As part of a new initiative from the Global Epicenter of Mobility (GEM), organizations across many sectors in Det...
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Humans depend on the environment for their basic needs, such as food, fuel, minerals, water, air, etc. Burgeoning unplanned development activities to cater to the demands of the in...
Brachiopods of the Detroit River Group (Devonian) from southwestern Ontario and adjacent areas of Michigan and Ohio
Brachiopods of the Detroit River Group (Devonian) from southwestern Ontario and adjacent areas of Michigan and Ohio
The Detroit River Group is a widely distributed sequence of carbonate and evaporate deposits in the Michigan Basin and adjacent parts of the craton. In the type are a, these rocks ...
Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology
Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology
The concept of an “ecosystem” is increasingly used in management and business to describe collectives of heterogeneous, yet complementary organizations who jointly create some kind...
Кey signs of ecosystem assets valuation
Кey signs of ecosystem assets valuation
The purpose of the article is to develop scientific approaches and identify key features of the assessment of ecosystem assets of territorial communities. The article examine...
The Strait
The Strait
Beautiful Wasteland concludes by wrapping together the work of the narratives of focus into a final discussion of Detroit and its contemporary relationship to water. Detroit in the...
Improving the efficiency of ecosystem evaluation assets related to water
Improving the efficiency of ecosystem evaluation assets related to water
The article develops scientific proposals for a comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem assets of territorial communities related to water in two key areas: 1) to the central executi...
Bridging local and global knowledges to classify, describe and map ecosystems
Bridging local and global knowledges to classify, describe and map ecosystems
Effective ecosystem management for biodiversity and human well-being relies on accurate information. Consistent approaches to classifying, describing, and assessing ecosystems can ...

Back to Top