Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Vegetation response to elk population and habitat management in Rocky Mountain National Park: Analysis of elk and vegetation management plan monitoring data, 2008-2023
View through CrossRef
Fifteen years ago, Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) implemented an Elk and Vegetation Management Plan (EVMP) in response to increasing negative impacts of winter elk herbivory on key plant communities. The EVMP is intended to guide the management of elk and vegetation over a 20-year period, reduce the impacts of elk on vegetation, and bring target ecosystems into the natural range of variability for elk and vegetation in aspen, montane riparian willow, and upland herbaceous habitats. Monitoring plots were established at the outset and vegetation data is collected, analyzed, and results are reported every 5 years. These results are used by managers to modify management actions as needed to improve the condition of key habitats on the elk winter range. A small number of aspen and willow sites are also monitored in the Kawuneeche Valley, an elk summer range area that has experienced willow and aspen decline from summer elk herbivory as well as several decades of moose herbivory.
After 15 years of EVMP management, results are mixed. Progress toward improved habitat that was observed through the first 10 years appears to have plateaued in the last 5 years, likely due to several additional factors, namely an increasing moose population and large wildfires which affected EVMP aspen and willow sites. Aspen regeneration and recruitment has steadily increased since baseline and, by 2023, was just short of reaching the 20-year EVMP objective, but most progress has been inside protective fences. Aspen stand structure has improved, but only inside fences and in unfenced, noncore winter range. Willow height increased by 43% relative to baseline conditions and willow cover nearly doubled over the entire winter range, however these increases were mostly limited to fenced areas. Noncore winter range showed only modest willow height and cover gains, while no significant change was observed on unfenced core winter range despite a ~50% reduction in browse intensity. In the Kawuneeche Valley, unfenced willow and aspen have continued to decline. The level of elk grazing on winter range upland herbaceous vegetation has been successfully reduced and no additional grazing-related changes appear to be taking place. Although many EVMP objectives have been met after 15 years, the habitat fences are key to maintaining patches of high-quality habitat and we advise against removing them until other components of the system (beaver communities, restoration of hydrologic regimes, willow recruitment, stable elk and moose populations) are functioning.
Title: Vegetation response to elk population and habitat management in Rocky Mountain National Park: Analysis of elk and vegetation management plan monitoring data, 2008-2023
Description:
Fifteen years ago, Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) implemented an Elk and Vegetation Management Plan (EVMP) in response to increasing negative impacts of winter elk herbivory on key plant communities.
The EVMP is intended to guide the management of elk and vegetation over a 20-year period, reduce the impacts of elk on vegetation, and bring target ecosystems into the natural range of variability for elk and vegetation in aspen, montane riparian willow, and upland herbaceous habitats.
Monitoring plots were established at the outset and vegetation data is collected, analyzed, and results are reported every 5 years.
These results are used by managers to modify management actions as needed to improve the condition of key habitats on the elk winter range.
A small number of aspen and willow sites are also monitored in the Kawuneeche Valley, an elk summer range area that has experienced willow and aspen decline from summer elk herbivory as well as several decades of moose herbivory.
After 15 years of EVMP management, results are mixed.
Progress toward improved habitat that was observed through the first 10 years appears to have plateaued in the last 5 years, likely due to several additional factors, namely an increasing moose population and large wildfires which affected EVMP aspen and willow sites.
Aspen regeneration and recruitment has steadily increased since baseline and, by 2023, was just short of reaching the 20-year EVMP objective, but most progress has been inside protective fences.
Aspen stand structure has improved, but only inside fences and in unfenced, noncore winter range.
Willow height increased by 43% relative to baseline conditions and willow cover nearly doubled over the entire winter range, however these increases were mostly limited to fenced areas.
Noncore winter range showed only modest willow height and cover gains, while no significant change was observed on unfenced core winter range despite a ~50% reduction in browse intensity.
In the Kawuneeche Valley, unfenced willow and aspen have continued to decline.
The level of elk grazing on winter range upland herbaceous vegetation has been successfully reduced and no additional grazing-related changes appear to be taking place.
Although many EVMP objectives have been met after 15 years, the habitat fences are key to maintaining patches of high-quality habitat and we advise against removing them until other components of the system (beaver communities, restoration of hydrologic regimes, willow recruitment, stable elk and moose populations) are functioning.
Related Results
Modeling Elk Nutrition and Habitat Use in Western Oregon and Washington
Modeling Elk Nutrition and Habitat Use in Western Oregon and Washington
ABSTRACTStudies of habitat selection and use by wildlife, especially large herbivores, are foundational for understanding their ecology and management, especially if predictors of ...
A vegetation classi?cation and map: Guadalupe Mountains National Park
A vegetation classi?cation and map: Guadalupe Mountains National Park
A vegetation classi?cation and map for Guadalupe Mountains National Park (NP) is presented as part of the National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring - Vegetation Inventory Pr...
Bison and elk spatiotemporal interactions in Elk Island National Park
Bison and elk spatiotemporal interactions in Elk Island National Park
Elk Island National Park (EINP) is a fenced park in the Beaver Hills UNESCO Biosphere Reserve of central Alberta where aspen parkland is being conserved. This area maintains high d...
Bird community monitoring at George Washington Carver National Monu-ment, Missouri: Status report 2008–2020
Bird community monitoring at George Washington Carver National Monu-ment, Missouri: Status report 2008–2020
Breeding bird surveys were initiated on George Washington Carver National Monument, Missouri, in 2008 to assess temporal changes in the species composition and abundance of birds o...
Terrestrial vegetation monitoring at Fort Frederica National Monument: 2020 data summary
Terrestrial vegetation monitoring at Fort Frederica National Monument: 2020 data summary
The Southeast Coast Network (SECN) conducts long-term terrestrial vegetation monitoring as part of the nationwide Inventory and Monitoring Program of the National Park Service (NPS...
Bird monitoring at Homestead National Historical Park, Nebraska: Status report 2009–2022
Bird monitoring at Homestead National Historical Park, Nebraska: Status report 2009–2022
In 2009, the Heartland Inventory and Monitoring Network initiated bird surveys on Homestead National Historical Park to monitor changes in bird community composition and abundance ...
Consequences of ratio‐dependent predation by wolves for elk population dynamics
Consequences of ratio‐dependent predation by wolves for elk population dynamics
Abstract
A growing number of studies suggest ratio‐dependence may be common in many predator–prey systems, yet in large mammal systems, evidence is limited to wol...
Predicting multi-predator risk to elk (Cervus canadensis) using scats: Are migrant elk exposed to different predation risk?
Predicting multi-predator risk to elk (Cervus canadensis) using scats: Are migrant elk exposed to different predation risk?
There is evidence that prey can perceive the risk of predation and alter
their behaviour in response, resulting in changes in spatial
distribution and potential fitness consequence...


