Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Utilization of Interval Throwing Programs: Analysis of Athletic Trainer, Physical Therapist, and Physician Perspectives

View through CrossRef
Context : A common component within rehabilitation recommendations for baseball pitchers is employment of an interval throwing program. However, there is a lack of a consistent set of advocated guidelines for program content and implementation for athletes at the professional and collegiate levels. Design : Cross-sectional study. Methods : A survey was developed to obtain clinician views regarding the composition and implementation of interval throwing programs for baseball pitchers. The survey was divided into demographic information and sections on criteria to begin throwing programs, frequency of throwing, soreness management, warm-up components, program components and regulation of a program, and criteria to achieve permitting live throwing. Clinicians including physicians, physical therapists, and certified athletic trainers who evaluate and treat musculoskeletal injuries among baseball pitchers at the professional-level and/or collegiate-level clinician received the survey. Responses were tabulated and compared between the professional-level clinician and collegiate-level clinician groups using chi-square analyses with statistical significance set at P  ≤ .05. Results : The survey was completed by 166 clinicians (collegiate level = 81, professional-level clinician = 85). There were no statistical differences between groups for allowing warm-up throws, program regulation, maximum distance allowed, managing soreness, or criteria to achieve before permitting live throwing. Between-group differences included criteria to begin a program (≤.03), warm-up distance ( P  ≤ .02), nonthrowing warm-up methods ( P  ≤ .04), non-warm-up distance ( P  ≤ .01), using ratings of perceived exertion ( P  < .01), throwing frequency ( P  < .01), and program components ( P  ≤ .04). Conclusions : Responses appear to mirror interval throwing program designs previously reported in the literature but there are modifications and additions utilized by clinicians at different playing levels.
Title: Utilization of Interval Throwing Programs: Analysis of Athletic Trainer, Physical Therapist, and Physician Perspectives
Description:
Context : A common component within rehabilitation recommendations for baseball pitchers is employment of an interval throwing program.
However, there is a lack of a consistent set of advocated guidelines for program content and implementation for athletes at the professional and collegiate levels.
Design : Cross-sectional study.
Methods : A survey was developed to obtain clinician views regarding the composition and implementation of interval throwing programs for baseball pitchers.
The survey was divided into demographic information and sections on criteria to begin throwing programs, frequency of throwing, soreness management, warm-up components, program components and regulation of a program, and criteria to achieve permitting live throwing.
Clinicians including physicians, physical therapists, and certified athletic trainers who evaluate and treat musculoskeletal injuries among baseball pitchers at the professional-level and/or collegiate-level clinician received the survey.
Responses were tabulated and compared between the professional-level clinician and collegiate-level clinician groups using chi-square analyses with statistical significance set at P  ≤ .
05.
Results : The survey was completed by 166 clinicians (collegiate level = 81, professional-level clinician = 85).
There were no statistical differences between groups for allowing warm-up throws, program regulation, maximum distance allowed, managing soreness, or criteria to achieve before permitting live throwing.
Between-group differences included criteria to begin a program (≤.
03), warm-up distance ( P  ≤ .
02), nonthrowing warm-up methods ( P  ≤ .
04), non-warm-up distance ( P  ≤ .
01), using ratings of perceived exertion ( P  < .
01), throwing frequency ( P  < .
01), and program components ( P  ≤ .
04).
Conclusions : Responses appear to mirror interval throwing program designs previously reported in the literature but there are modifications and additions utilized by clinicians at different playing levels.

Related Results

Female Athletic Training Students' Perceptions of Motherhood and Retention in Athletic Training
Female Athletic Training Students' Perceptions of Motherhood and Retention in Athletic Training
Context: Motherhood appears to be a catalyst in job turnover for female athletic trainers, especially those employed at the National Collegiate Athletic Associati...
Research on the Innovation of Throwing Techniques for High-Pole Embroidered Balls and the Sustainable Development of National Sports
Research on the Innovation of Throwing Techniques for High-Pole Embroidered Balls and the Sustainable Development of National Sports
Abstract Research purpose: This study aims to understand the historical and cultural origins of throwing embroidered balls and inherit national sports culture, analyze the ...
Athletic Training Student Socialization Part I: Socializing Students in Undergraduate Athletic Training Programs
Athletic Training Student Socialization Part I: Socializing Students in Undergraduate Athletic Training Programs
Context Professional socialization is a key process in the professional development of athletic training students. The published athletic training education resea...
Standardized Patients Provide a Reliable Assessment of Athletic Training Students' Clinical Skills
Standardized Patients Provide a Reliable Assessment of Athletic Training Students' Clinical Skills
Context: Providing students reliable objective feedback regarding their clinical performance is of great value for ongoing clinical skill assessment. Since a standardized patient (...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Measuring therapist cognitions contributing to therapist drift: a qualitative study
Measuring therapist cognitions contributing to therapist drift: a qualitative study
AbstractTherapist beliefs have been identified as a contributing factor to ‘therapist drift’ in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Scales have been developed to measure therapist...

Back to Top