Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, collectively referred to as the SNAP risk factors. Due to the high prevalence, co-occurrence, and possible interactive health effects of such health behaviours in pregnancy, antenatal interventions that support pregnant women to improve multiple SNAP behaviours have a greater potential impact on the health outcomes of women and their children than interventions addressing single behaviours. The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered as part of antenatal care that aim to improve multiple SNAP behaviours among pregnant women.Methods: Seven electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible studies. Eligible studies will include those where pregnant women are attending antenatal care. Studies that examine the effect of an intervention that addresses multiple SNAP behaviours (≥ two behaviours) during pregnancy and are delivered or instigated through antenatal care in a healthcare service will be included. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RCTs, cluster RCTs, stepped wedge RCTs, and non-randomised control trials will be eligible. Studies that include a no intervention control, wait-list control group, standard/usual care, or another active single behavioural intervention (e.g. addressing one behaviour only) will be considered. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer if required. A random effects model will be used to synthesise the results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarising effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form.Discussion: The review will synthesise the evidence on the effect of interventions that address multiple SNAP behaviours in antenatal care, and will help researchers, policy makers, and health services to develop and deliver best practice integrated models of antenatal care that have the potential to impact on both the short and long term health outcomes for women and their children.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018095315
Title: Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.
Description:
Abstract
Background: Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, collectively referred to as the SNAP risk factors.
Due to the high prevalence, co-occurrence, and possible interactive health effects of such health behaviours in pregnancy, antenatal interventions that support pregnant women to improve multiple SNAP behaviours have a greater potential impact on the health outcomes of women and their children than interventions addressing single behaviours.
The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered as part of antenatal care that aim to improve multiple SNAP behaviours among pregnant women.
Methods: Seven electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible studies.
Eligible studies will include those where pregnant women are attending antenatal care.
Studies that examine the effect of an intervention that addresses multiple SNAP behaviours (≥ two behaviours) during pregnancy and are delivered or instigated through antenatal care in a healthcare service will be included.
Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RCTs, cluster RCTs, stepped wedge RCTs, and non-randomised control trials will be eligible.
Studies that include a no intervention control, wait-list control group, standard/usual care, or another active single behavioural intervention (e.
g.
addressing one behaviour only) will be considered.
Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.
Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer if required.
A random effects model will be used to synthesise the results.
Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarising effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form.
Discussion: The review will synthesise the evidence on the effect of interventions that address multiple SNAP behaviours in antenatal care, and will help researchers, policy makers, and health services to develop and deliver best practice integrated models of antenatal care that have the potential to impact on both the short and long term health outcomes for women and their children.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018095315.
Related Results
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.
Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.
Abstract
Background: Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumpt...
“A STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOGA THERAPY AMONG ANTENATAL WOMEN WITH PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION ATTENDING AT ANTENATAL CLINIC IN SELECTED HOSPITAL IN DEHRADUN, UTTARAKHAND.”
“A STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOGA THERAPY AMONG ANTENATAL WOMEN WITH PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION ATTENDING AT ANTENATAL CLINIC IN SELECTED HOSPITAL IN DEHRADUN, UTTARAKHAND.”
Background: The rate of maternal morbidity due to hypertensive disorder even with highly improved maternity service is high. In India there is
high prevalence of pregnancy induced ...
HUBUNGAN PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL DENGAN PERILAKU PEMERIKSAAN ANTENATAL CARE SELAMA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI KOTA DEPOK TAHUN 2022
HUBUNGAN PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL DENGAN PERILAKU PEMERIKSAAN ANTENATAL CARE SELAMA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI KOTA DEPOK TAHUN 2022
Abstract
Background: During the Covid-19 pandemic, the government imposed restrictions on health services and it has an impact on decreasing the coverage of antenatal care se...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

