Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Application of oral sulfate solution combined with linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy
View through CrossRef
Objective
High-quality bowel preparation is essential for accurate colonoscopy. Currently, linaclotide is used as an adjunctive agent supporting bowel preparation, but evidence for its combination with oral sulfate solution (OSS) remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of linaclotide to OSS could improve the efficacy of bowel preparation.
Methods
This single-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three groups: the OSS + Linaclotide group, the OSS group, or the polyethylene glycol (PEG) group. The primary outcome was the adequate bowel preparation rate, while secondary outcomes included tolerability, colonoscopy findings, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, and safety was evaluated in the as-treated population.
Results
A total of 370 patients were included in the mITT analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the adequate bowel preparation rate between the OSS + Linaclotide group and the OSS group (86.5% vs. 88.0%; unadjusted relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–1.08;
p
= 0.723). In the unadjusted analysis, both the OSS + Linaclotide group (86.5% vs. 73.9%; unadjusted RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03–1.33;
p
= 0.013) and the OSS group (88.0% vs. 73.9%; unadjusted RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05–1.35;
p
= 0.005) demonstrated significantly higher adequate bowel preparation rates than the PEG group. Moreover, the analysis adjusted for covariates showed no statistically significant differences between groups (
p
> 0.05). In exploratory analysis, patient-reported incidence of bloating was less frequent in the OSS + Linaclotide group (4.0% vs. 16.0% vs. 11.8%,
p
= 0.007), with no increase in nausea, vomiting, or other adverse events. No significant between-group differences were observed in other tolerability measures or colonoscopy findings.
Conclusion
This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Linaclotide added to OSS provided no additional cleansing efficacy over OSS alone or PEG. Exploratory analysis found that the combination may reduce bloating, a potential tolerability advantage requiring further verification in future studies.
Frontiers Media SA
Title: Application of oral sulfate solution combined with linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy
Description:
Objective
High-quality bowel preparation is essential for accurate colonoscopy.
Currently, linaclotide is used as an adjunctive agent supporting bowel preparation, but evidence for its combination with oral sulfate solution (OSS) remains limited.
This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of linaclotide to OSS could improve the efficacy of bowel preparation.
Methods
This single-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy.
Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three groups: the OSS + Linaclotide group, the OSS group, or the polyethylene glycol (PEG) group.
The primary outcome was the adequate bowel preparation rate, while secondary outcomes included tolerability, colonoscopy findings, and safety.
Efficacy endpoints were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, and safety was evaluated in the as-treated population.
Results
A total of 370 patients were included in the mITT analysis.
There was no statistically significant difference in the adequate bowel preparation rate between the OSS + Linaclotide group and the OSS group (86.
5% vs.
88.
0%; unadjusted relative risk [RR], 0.
98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.
89–1.
08;
p
= 0.
723).
In the unadjusted analysis, both the OSS + Linaclotide group (86.
5% vs.
73.
9%; unadjusted RR, 1.
17; 95% CI, 1.
03–1.
33;
p
= 0.
013) and the OSS group (88.
0% vs.
73.
9%; unadjusted RR, 1.
19; 95% CI, 1.
05–1.
35;
p
= 0.
005) demonstrated significantly higher adequate bowel preparation rates than the PEG group.
Moreover, the analysis adjusted for covariates showed no statistically significant differences between groups (
p
> 0.
05).
In exploratory analysis, patient-reported incidence of bloating was less frequent in the OSS + Linaclotide group (4.
0% vs.
16.
0% vs.
11.
8%,
p
= 0.
007), with no increase in nausea, vomiting, or other adverse events.
No significant between-group differences were observed in other tolerability measures or colonoscopy findings.
Conclusion
This study did not meet its primary endpoint.
Linaclotide added to OSS provided no additional cleansing efficacy over OSS alone or PEG.
Exploratory analysis found that the combination may reduce bloating, a potential tolerability advantage requiring further verification in future studies.
Related Results
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Low-Fibre Diet as an Option for Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy: ARandomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy plays an important role in the evaluation of the colon. Many methods for preparing the colon for colonoscopy do not work well. Aim:...
Intestinal Biofilms and Laxatives: Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Solution in Combination with Linaclotide for Pre-colonoscopy Bowel Preparation
Intestinal Biofilms and Laxatives: Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Solution in Combination with Linaclotide for Pre-colonoscopy Bowel Preparation
Abstract
Aims:The present study endeavors to explore the effectiveness of a combined regimen of an oral sulfate solution (OSS) and linaclotide in bowel preparation, while a...
#829 Renoprotective effects of laxative linaclotide: inhibition of acute kidney injury and fibrosis in a rat model of renal ischemia-reperfusion
#829 Renoprotective effects of laxative linaclotide: inhibition of acute kidney injury and fibrosis in a rat model of renal ischemia-reperfusion
Abstract
Background and Aims
Acute kidney injury caused by renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is a major clinical problem in many ...
#3650 LINACLOTIDE IS PROTECTIVE AGAINST RENAL ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION INJURY
#3650 LINACLOTIDE IS PROTECTIVE AGAINST RENAL ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION INJURY
Abstract
Background and Aims
Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury is associated with delayed graft function and poor long-term graf...
PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation
PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation
Background
Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer deaths in England. Most cases of colorectal cancer aris...
Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing
Shorter preparation to procedure interval for colonoscopy improves quality of bowel cleansing
AbstractBackgroundThe timing of bowel preparation for colonoscopy influences the quality of bowel cleansing and the success of the procedure.AimWe aimed to determine whether the in...
Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis
Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis
Introduction Surgical site infections cause considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the effect on surgical site infection rates f...
Efficacy of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with olive oil plus low volume polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus conventional volume polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution.
Efficacy of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with olive oil plus low volume polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus conventional volume polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of bowel preparation with an olive oil plus low volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) and conventional volu...

