Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Geology and Geohistory Contribute to Flow Assurance
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Kashagan is a super giant offshore carbonate field which was discovered in 2000 by a consortium of oil companies (currently, affiliates of): ExxonMobil, ENI, Shell, TOTAL, Conoco-Phillips, INPEX and KazMunaiGaz. The field is located in an environmentally sensitive area of the North Caspian Sea. The field is a deep, large structural relief, over pressured, isolated, carbonate build-up with a high-permeability, karstified and fractured rim and relatively low-permeability platform interior. The field contains a sour, undersaturated light oil with a large gas content. High pressure miscible gas injection is planned for oil recovery enhancement, as well as sulfur management.
No-one doubts the importance of flow assurance in offshore projects in particular. Moreover, it is now well known that gas injection operations require the evaluation of asphaltene deposition risk. The consortium has undertaken extensive evaluations to ascertain the likelihood of any flow assurance risks from subsurface to surface. During the asphaltene risk evaluation, many bottomhole samples have been collected and analyzed for asphaltene content, asphaltene onset pressure (AOP), and SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes). These continuous analysis efforts have revealed some anomalous results such as AOP being detected from some fluid samples while not being detected from others.
The apparently inconsistent AOP results are critical to understand how to guide flow assurance measures. Therefore, all available asphaltene data were re-assessed in all their aspects to attempt to clarify asphaltene risk. This paper presents a multidisciplinary approach where a synergy between reservoir engineering and geoscience (geology and geohistory) has been developed to explain AOP results for this complex fluid. The results should help flow assurance specialists to better define the asphaltene operating envelope, which will be used for reservoir and production operations optimization. In addition, these results should be useful for optimizing data-surveillance, flow assurance, and for defining new sample acquisition plans. These findings may also be helpful to minimize future sampling and fluids analysis while achieving reliable flow assurance. The paper will show examples of the related flow assurance analyses, and the geological information which were incorporated in the study, resulting in a detailed asphaltene matrix risk profile for this reservoir.
Title: Geology and Geohistory Contribute to Flow Assurance
Description:
Abstract
Kashagan is a super giant offshore carbonate field which was discovered in 2000 by a consortium of oil companies (currently, affiliates of): ExxonMobil, ENI, Shell, TOTAL, Conoco-Phillips, INPEX and KazMunaiGaz.
The field is located in an environmentally sensitive area of the North Caspian Sea.
The field is a deep, large structural relief, over pressured, isolated, carbonate build-up with a high-permeability, karstified and fractured rim and relatively low-permeability platform interior.
The field contains a sour, undersaturated light oil with a large gas content.
High pressure miscible gas injection is planned for oil recovery enhancement, as well as sulfur management.
No-one doubts the importance of flow assurance in offshore projects in particular.
Moreover, it is now well known that gas injection operations require the evaluation of asphaltene deposition risk.
The consortium has undertaken extensive evaluations to ascertain the likelihood of any flow assurance risks from subsurface to surface.
During the asphaltene risk evaluation, many bottomhole samples have been collected and analyzed for asphaltene content, asphaltene onset pressure (AOP), and SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes).
These continuous analysis efforts have revealed some anomalous results such as AOP being detected from some fluid samples while not being detected from others.
The apparently inconsistent AOP results are critical to understand how to guide flow assurance measures.
Therefore, all available asphaltene data were re-assessed in all their aspects to attempt to clarify asphaltene risk.
This paper presents a multidisciplinary approach where a synergy between reservoir engineering and geoscience (geology and geohistory) has been developed to explain AOP results for this complex fluid.
The results should help flow assurance specialists to better define the asphaltene operating envelope, which will be used for reservoir and production operations optimization.
In addition, these results should be useful for optimizing data-surveillance, flow assurance, and for defining new sample acquisition plans.
These findings may also be helpful to minimize future sampling and fluids analysis while achieving reliable flow assurance.
The paper will show examples of the related flow assurance analyses, and the geological information which were incorporated in the study, resulting in a detailed asphaltene matrix risk profile for this reservoir.
Related Results
Intelligent Drill-Stem Test for Well-Scale Flow Assurance Monitoring and Elemental Sulfur Deposition Prevention Enables Field Development in an Offshore Deep Gas Reservoir
Intelligent Drill-Stem Test for Well-Scale Flow Assurance Monitoring and Elemental Sulfur Deposition Prevention Enables Field Development in an Offshore Deep Gas Reservoir
Abstract
Flow assurance challenges pose significant risks for production. Lab-scale flow assurance experiments are common, but well-scale experiments are required du...
Implementing combined assurance: insights from multiple case studies
Implementing combined assurance: insights from multiple case studies
Purpose
– This purpose of this paper is to investigate how to implement a combined assurance program.
Design/methodology/a...
Multiphase Flow Metering:An Evaluation of Discharge Coefficients
Multiphase Flow Metering:An Evaluation of Discharge Coefficients
Abstract
The orifice discharge coefficient (CD) is the constant required to correct theoretical flow rate to actual flow rate. It is known that single phase orifi...
Pressure Analysis of DST Flow Period Or Slug Flow For Horizontal Wells In Homogeneous Reservoir
Pressure Analysis of DST Flow Period Or Slug Flow For Horizontal Wells In Homogeneous Reservoir
Abstract
By the transient pressure for horizontal well with constant flow rate and Duhamel's principle, this paper presents the method to calculate the transient ...
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Abstract
Introduction
In patients with 70% to 99% diameter carotid artery stenosis cerebral blood flow reserve may be protectiv...
Characterization of Oil-Water Two-phase Flow Patterns in Vertical Upward Flow Pipes Based on Fractal and Chaotic Time Series Analysis
Characterization of Oil-Water Two-phase Flow Patterns in Vertical Upward Flow Pipes Based on Fractal and Chaotic Time Series Analysis
Abstract
Characterization of oil-water two-phase flow patterns in vertical upward oil-water two-phase flow having an inner diameter 18mm are elucidated based on f...
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Flow Field in the Integrated Valve for the Control Rod Hydraulic Drive System
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Flow Field in the Integrated Valve for the Control Rod Hydraulic Drive System
Control Rod Hydraulic Drive System (CRHDS) is a new type of built-in control rod drive technology, and the Integrated Valve (IV) is the key control component of it. The pulse water...
GEOHISTORY MODELLING OF CRATONIC BASINS: A CASE STUDY OF THE ORDOS BASIN, NW CHINA
GEOHISTORY MODELLING OF CRATONIC BASINS: A CASE STUDY OF THE ORDOS BASIN, NW CHINA
This paper describes geohistory modelling as applied to the intracratonic Ordos Basin in NW China; corrections for compaction, the restoration of unconformities and the effects of ...

