Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The IAEA’s Critical Role in Nuclear Security
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the key multilateral global nuclear governance body, describes itself as the ‘global platform’ for nuclear security efforts, with a ‘central role’ in facilitating international cooperation in the field. After initial contestation among member states about whether the IAEA’s mandate encompassed it, nuclear security has now been universally accepted as a valuable mainstream IAEA activity. Although states still insist that nuclear security is primarily their responsibility, the Agency’s programme continues to evolve and grow and can barely meet demand for its services. It has been particularly effective in promulgating recommendations for enhancing nuclear security at the national level and in advising and assisting states in striving for higher standards. Since the end of the Nuclear Security Summit process in 2016, the IAEA has taken on the role of principal conference convenor, involving a ministerial meeting and increasingly creative technical presentations and side events. The Agency faces the usual dilemmas of international organizations in being constrained by what its member states will allow and by financial and technical limitations. This can result in modest advances after painstaking negotiations and lowest-common-denominator approaches. With a more expansive mandate, sharper prioritization and evaluation of its activities, and guaranteed funding through the regular budget, the IAEA could make a significantly greater contribution to preventing nuclear terrorism.
Title: The IAEA’s Critical Role in Nuclear Security
Description:
Abstract
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the key multilateral global nuclear governance body, describes itself as the ‘global platform’ for nuclear security efforts, with a ‘central role’ in facilitating international cooperation in the field.
After initial contestation among member states about whether the IAEA’s mandate encompassed it, nuclear security has now been universally accepted as a valuable mainstream IAEA activity.
Although states still insist that nuclear security is primarily their responsibility, the Agency’s programme continues to evolve and grow and can barely meet demand for its services.
It has been particularly effective in promulgating recommendations for enhancing nuclear security at the national level and in advising and assisting states in striving for higher standards.
Since the end of the Nuclear Security Summit process in 2016, the IAEA has taken on the role of principal conference convenor, involving a ministerial meeting and increasingly creative technical presentations and side events.
The Agency faces the usual dilemmas of international organizations in being constrained by what its member states will allow and by financial and technical limitations.
This can result in modest advances after painstaking negotiations and lowest-common-denominator approaches.
With a more expansive mandate, sharper prioritization and evaluation of its activities, and guaranteed funding through the regular budget, the IAEA could make a significantly greater contribution to preventing nuclear terrorism.
Related Results
Institutional Design and Normative Authority in the Effectiveness of the IAEA Nuclear Security Mandate
Institutional Design and Normative Authority in the Effectiveness of the IAEA Nuclear Security Mandate
Abstract
The International Atomic Energy Agency exercises significant nuclear security governance authority without possessing the enforcement powers mandatory insp...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Nuclear Weapons, Cyber Warfare, and Cyber Security: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues
Nuclear Weapons, Cyber Warfare, and Cyber Security: Ethical and Anticipated Ethical Issues
In this paper, we discuss the interrelationship of nuclear weapons, cyber warfare, and cyber security. Some of the most significant cyber threats to nuclear stability are now ...
Bifurcated Compliance and the Compliance Facade Problem in the IAEA Nuclear Security Architecture
Bifurcated Compliance and the Compliance Facade Problem in the IAEA Nuclear Security Architecture
Abstract
The International Atomic Energy Agency-led nuclear security governance architecture has substantially expanded since 2004, yet the persistence of significa...
Information Security in Artificial Intelligence: A Study of the possible intersection
Information Security in Artificial Intelligence: A Study of the possible intersection
1. IntroductionArtificial Intelligence or A.I attempts to understand intelligent entities, and strives to build ones. And it is obvious that computers with human-level intelligence...
The Role of Nuclear Forensics for Determining the Origin of Nuclear Materials Out of Regulatory Control and Nuclear Security
The Role of Nuclear Forensics for Determining the Origin of Nuclear Materials Out of Regulatory Control and Nuclear Security
The international community recognizes the rise in theft and illicit trafficking of nuclear materials and radioactive sources—for malicious use and nuclear terrorism—as a serious t...
Assessing Governance Adaptation Lag and Compound Strategic Vulnerability in the IAEA Nuclear Security Architecture
Assessing Governance Adaptation Lag and Compound Strategic Vulnerability in the IAEA Nuclear Security Architecture
Abstract
The threat environment governed by the International Atomic Energy Agency-led nuclear security architecture has evolved substantially across the 2010-2025 ...
The IAEA’s International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO)
The IAEA’s International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO)
This paper presents the IAEA International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO). It defines its rationale, key objectives and specifies the organizational...

