Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Heterochrony

View through CrossRef
Heterochrony, broadly defined, refers to evolutionary change in the rate or timing of development. The concept has long been central to evolutionary developmental biology and remains actively investigated, but both the meaning of the word and the evolutionary significance of heterochrony have changed more than once since the word was first introduced in Haeckel’s Naturliche Schopfungsgeschichte (Berlin: Georg Reime, 1868). Gould’s Ontogeny and Phylogeny (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press) is the foundational work that reinvigorated the study of heterochrony; the first half of that book is a historical overview of the subject; the second half is about the significance of heterochrony (and of development) for evolution. Heterochrony has been a major focus of evolutionary developmental biology, but the definition of the term and its biological significance have repeatedly changed. There are at least four distinct concepts of heterochrony, two of which are nearly mutually exclusive, and the others partially overlap both. Since the 2010s, that conceptual incoherence has decreased, but heterochrony remains a complex concept because of the disparate views about what it means as a word, and what follows from that: the biological significance of heterochrony and the methods for detecting it empirically. The concept remains a focus of evolutionary developmental biology because the core of ideas central to most concepts of heterochrony are now central to the field: the related concepts of “dissociability,” “modularity,” and “integration,” on which definitions (and theories) of heterochrony are grounded. Dissociability is the ability to alter individual developmental processes or stages independently of others, and it is dissociability that allows for shifts in (relative) developmental timing or rate. That concept links heterochrony to theories about developmental integration and modularity and thus to theories of intrinsic constraints. The major objective of this article is to clarify the conceptual frameworks associated with each definition of heterochrony and to highlight major themes in the literature, keeping semantic issues to a minimum.
Oxford University Press
Title: Heterochrony
Description:
Heterochrony, broadly defined, refers to evolutionary change in the rate or timing of development.
The concept has long been central to evolutionary developmental biology and remains actively investigated, but both the meaning of the word and the evolutionary significance of heterochrony have changed more than once since the word was first introduced in Haeckel’s Naturliche Schopfungsgeschichte (Berlin: Georg Reime, 1868).
Gould’s Ontogeny and Phylogeny (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press) is the foundational work that reinvigorated the study of heterochrony; the first half of that book is a historical overview of the subject; the second half is about the significance of heterochrony (and of development) for evolution.
Heterochrony has been a major focus of evolutionary developmental biology, but the definition of the term and its biological significance have repeatedly changed.
There are at least four distinct concepts of heterochrony, two of which are nearly mutually exclusive, and the others partially overlap both.
Since the 2010s, that conceptual incoherence has decreased, but heterochrony remains a complex concept because of the disparate views about what it means as a word, and what follows from that: the biological significance of heterochrony and the methods for detecting it empirically.
The concept remains a focus of evolutionary developmental biology because the core of ideas central to most concepts of heterochrony are now central to the field: the related concepts of “dissociability,” “modularity,” and “integration,” on which definitions (and theories) of heterochrony are grounded.
Dissociability is the ability to alter individual developmental processes or stages independently of others, and it is dissociability that allows for shifts in (relative) developmental timing or rate.
That concept links heterochrony to theories about developmental integration and modularity and thus to theories of intrinsic constraints.
The major objective of this article is to clarify the conceptual frameworks associated with each definition of heterochrony and to highlight major themes in the literature, keeping semantic issues to a minimum.

Related Results

Heterochrony as Diachronically Modified Cell-Cell Interactions
Heterochrony as Diachronically Modified Cell-Cell Interactions
Heterochrony is an enabling concept in evolution theory that metaphorically captures the mechanism of biologic change due to mechanisms of growth and development. The spatio-tempor...
Introduction: Modernism, Time Machines and the Defamiliarisation of Time
Introduction: Modernism, Time Machines and the Defamiliarisation of Time
This introduction returns to modernism’s incipient moments as the “Jonbar hinge” or pivot point for an alternative history of the period’s well-known time fixation. Using Lefebvre ...
The Heterochronic Past and Sidewise Historicity: T. S. Eliot, Pablo Picasso and Murray Leinster
The Heterochronic Past and Sidewise Historicity: T. S. Eliot, Pablo Picasso and Murray Leinster
At the beginning of the twentieth century, primitivism and paleomodernism appeared to reflect primarily those conditions out of which both modernism and SF have been shown to emerg...
Temporal Scale, The Far Future and Inhuman Times: Foresight in Wells and Woolf, Time Travel in Olaf Stapledon and Terrence Malick
Temporal Scale, The Far Future and Inhuman Times: Foresight in Wells and Woolf, Time Travel in Olaf Stapledon and Terrence Malick
This chapter links the period’s visions of the far future with modernism’s engagement with deep time in order to show how the big historicising that begins in the nineteenth centur...
Cinematic Art (History) and Mieke Bal's Thinking in Film
Cinematic Art (History) and Mieke Bal's Thinking in Film
The article focuses on Mieke Bal’s theoretical considerations of art in terms of film and movement in general. This cinematic frame offers her a conceptual framework for “thinking ...
Introduction: Timely Matters
Introduction: Timely Matters
In this introduction to our edited volume, we discuss the theoretical forebears that inform our guiding concept of “material temporalities” with an eye to the collections impact on...
Craniofacial ontogeny in Tylosaurinae
Craniofacial ontogeny in Tylosaurinae
Mosasaurs were large, globally distributed aquatic lizards that lived during the Late Cretaceous. Despite numerous specimens of varying maturity, a detailed growth series has not b...
Hitherto unknown detailed muscle anatomy in an 8‐week‐old embryo
Hitherto unknown detailed muscle anatomy in an 8‐week‐old embryo
AbstractCongenital muscle diseases, such as myopathies or dystrophies, occur relatively frequently, with estimated incidences of up to 4.7 per 100 000 newborns. To diagnose congeni...

Back to Top