Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pomeranian Campaign (1712–1713): Reconnaissance and Sabotage Activities of the Russian Army

View through CrossRef
Introduction. During the Great Northern War, the Russian army conducted many military campaigns in various theaters of combat operations. Many research papers have been devoted to the study of these events, but the events in Northern Germany (1712–1713) were not sufficiently disclosed. The article, with the involvement of sources on the history of the so-called “Pomeranian campaign,” including those not yet introduced into scientific circulation, reveals the features of conducting intelligence and sabotage activities of the army of Peter I in the conditions of a small war. Мaterials. The research is based on both published documents and those stored in archives, which allow us to restore the chronology of events and the methods of conducting intelligence and sabotage activities of the Petrovsky troops. Analysis. A comparison of the documentary evidence of the participants of the Pomeranian campaign, as well as research by Danish military historians, made it possible to determine the main methods of conducting reconnaissance and sabotage activities of Peter I’s troops in this theater of operations and to build a chronology of the events of the period 1712–1713, as well as the place and role of tactical intelligence assessment in the overall course of the campaign. Results. Despite the conditionally zero result of the Russian army, it was possible to achieve several significant results in Pomerania, in which the reconnaissance and sabotage activities of its troops played an important role, with the ability to expect the actions of the enemy and to stop threats from his side. Methods and materials. The basis of the source base was made up of documents stored in the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, as well as published materials: correspondence between the Most Serene Prince and Peter I, heads of offices and contractors, as well as notes and diaries of eyewitnesses. The study of published and archival sources and the analysis and comparison of the information contained in them make it possible to reveal the role of St. Petersburg governor A.D. Menshikov in the creation of a regularly built-up port city. Analysis. Before the laying of the Kronstadt fortress on October 7, 1723, the settlement on Kotlin had no name. The first stone houses on the southern coast of the island were erected by the forces of the provinces; therefore, they were called “provincial.” After the start of the second regional reform, the completion of the provincial houses was entrusted to Senator M.M. Samarin. The construction of all stone buildings Peter I entrusted to A.D. Menshikov. In 1720, the Office of the Construction of Kotlin Stone Houses was created to conduct work. In connection with the beginning of the construction of the canal (the future Petrovsky Dock), the wooden residential buildings and outbuildings located near the seacoast were demolished or moved inland. At the beginning of 1724, the stone houses in the “bracket” – the sea gates of Kronstadt – were transferred to the associates of the first Russian emperor and naval officers. Results. In historiography, all stone houses built in 1717–1725 on Kotlin are what it is customary to call “provincial.” The buildings begun in 1719 under the leadership of A.D. Menshikov were built on the model of the provincial ones, but they were called “the houses of his royal majesty.” The office of the construction of the Kotlin stone houses carried out work at a faster pace, which was facilitated by the huge administrative resources of the Petersburg governor.
Title: Pomeranian Campaign (1712–1713): Reconnaissance and Sabotage Activities of the Russian Army
Description:
Introduction.
During the Great Northern War, the Russian army conducted many military campaigns in various theaters of combat operations.
Many research papers have been devoted to the study of these events, but the events in Northern Germany (1712–1713) were not sufficiently disclosed.
The article, with the involvement of sources on the history of the so-called “Pomeranian campaign,” including those not yet introduced into scientific circulation, reveals the features of conducting intelligence and sabotage activities of the army of Peter I in the conditions of a small war.
Мaterials.
The research is based on both published documents and those stored in archives, which allow us to restore the chronology of events and the methods of conducting intelligence and sabotage activities of the Petrovsky troops.
Analysis.
A comparison of the documentary evidence of the participants of the Pomeranian campaign, as well as research by Danish military historians, made it possible to determine the main methods of conducting reconnaissance and sabotage activities of Peter I’s troops in this theater of operations and to build a chronology of the events of the period 1712–1713, as well as the place and role of tactical intelligence assessment in the overall course of the campaign.
Results.
Despite the conditionally zero result of the Russian army, it was possible to achieve several significant results in Pomerania, in which the reconnaissance and sabotage activities of its troops played an important role, with the ability to expect the actions of the enemy and to stop threats from his side.
Methods and materials.
The basis of the source base was made up of documents stored in the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, as well as published materials: correspondence between the Most Serene Prince and Peter I, heads of offices and contractors, as well as notes and diaries of eyewitnesses.
The study of published and archival sources and the analysis and comparison of the information contained in them make it possible to reveal the role of St.
Petersburg governor A.
D.
Menshikov in the creation of a regularly built-up port city.
Analysis.
Before the laying of the Kronstadt fortress on October 7, 1723, the settlement on Kotlin had no name.
The first stone houses on the southern coast of the island were erected by the forces of the provinces; therefore, they were called “provincial.
” After the start of the second regional reform, the completion of the provincial houses was entrusted to Senator M.
M.
Samarin.
The construction of all stone buildings Peter I entrusted to A.
D.
Menshikov.
In 1720, the Office of the Construction of Kotlin Stone Houses was created to conduct work.
In connection with the beginning of the construction of the canal (the future Petrovsky Dock), the wooden residential buildings and outbuildings located near the seacoast were demolished or moved inland.
At the beginning of 1724, the stone houses in the “bracket” – the sea gates of Kronstadt – were transferred to the associates of the first Russian emperor and naval officers.
Results.
In historiography, all stone houses built in 1717–1725 on Kotlin are what it is customary to call “provincial.
” The buildings begun in 1719 under the leadership of A.
D.
Menshikov were built on the model of the provincial ones, but they were called “the houses of his royal majesty.
” The office of the construction of the Kotlin stone houses carried out work at a faster pace, which was facilitated by the huge administrative resources of the Petersburg governor.

Related Results

Perilaku Konsumtif Menonton Konser Agust D Tour ‘D-Day In Jakarta’
Perilaku Konsumtif Menonton Konser Agust D Tour ‘D-Day In Jakarta’
Abstract. K-Pop idols or artists often carry out world tours or music concerts which of course can be attended by tens of thousands of fans. As is the case in Indonesia, a number o...
John Bruce, Jr. : a Sixty-Nine Year Leadership Journey Throughout Change in the United States Army
John Bruce, Jr. : a Sixty-Nine Year Leadership Journey Throughout Change in the United States Army
Problem and Purpose The U.S. Army has changed radically in the 68 years since World War II ended, from uniforms to vehicles, from weaponry to organizational changes. While still t...
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF 2022 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE KUYAVIAN-POMERANIAN VOIVODESHIP
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF 2022 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE KUYAVIAN-POMERANIAN VOIVODESHIP
Purpose: The purpose of the article is to analyze the state of 2022 research and development (R&D) activity in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian region, taking the structure of outlays,...
Attack Graphs & Subset Sabotage Games
Attack Graphs & Subset Sabotage Games
 We consider an extended version of sabotage games played over Attack Graphs. Such games are two-player zero-sum reachability games between an Attacker and a Defender. This latter ...
Magomed Akhmedov's Artistic Reflections on Russian Poetry (on the Development of Dagestan-Russian Literary Relations)
Magomed Akhmedov's Artistic Reflections on Russian Poetry (on the Development of Dagestan-Russian Literary Relations)
The subject of this research is M. Akhmedov's literary reflections and his poetic works dedicated to Russian writers and Russian poetry. The purpose of this article is to present a...
Management of Russian-Speaking Education in Sri Lanka: Problems and Solutions
Management of Russian-Speaking Education in Sri Lanka: Problems and Solutions
Introduction. Promotion of national traditions, cultures and languages is an important component of the foreign policy of countries in the modern conditions of globalization and dy...
Mitos Militerisme pada Busana Kampanye (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Busana Kampanye Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono–Sylviana Murni)
Mitos Militerisme pada Busana Kampanye (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Busana Kampanye Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono–Sylviana Murni)
ABSTRACTThe importance of fashion campaigns in the process of political communication in Indonesia has gained its own spotlight over the years. Clothing is seen to have an artifact...

Back to Top