Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Combining individual and close‐kin mark–recapture to design an effective wildlife population survey

View through CrossRef
Abstract Close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) is a promising approach for assessing population size of species that have been difficult to survey using more traditional methods. Here, we combine individual and close‐kin mark–recapture in a single modeling framework (ICKMR) and provide an example of study design using this approach for Pacific walrus ( Odobenus rosmarus divergens ). We develop the ICKMR model and test it using simulated datasets, then use properties of the pseudo‐likelihood to investigate the expected precision in estimates of abundance with different proposed survey designs. Our motivating example, the Pacific walrus, is an ice‐associated marine mammal found in the Bering and Chukchi seas, where it is an important resource for Indigenous peoples. Pacific walrus abundance declined in the late 20th century, and it is currently a species of conservation concern due to potential impacts of climate change, particularly the loss of sea ice. To reduce uncertainty in population size estimates, researchers undertook a genetic mark–recapture sampling campaign from 2013 to 2017 and collected tissue samples from over 8000 individuals. Another campaign of a similar scale is ongoing (2023–2028). While sample collection was designed for individual mark–recapture, advances in CKMR methods and associated molecular techniques mean that these samples could also be suitable for CKMR. The advantages of CKMR over mark–recapture include an increased effective sample size (because each individual tags itself and its parents, siblings, and offspring) and additional insights into demographic quantities of interest. To make best use of genetic samples, we combine individual mark–recapture (IMR) with CKMR (ICKMR) and investigate whether different sampling strategies can increase precision in estimates of abundance. Our modeling approach includes special considerations for walrus life history, including a multi‐year inter‐birth interval. We found that expected coefficients of variation (CVs) of the ICKMR estimates of abundance, adult female survival, juvenile female survival, and proportion of breeding females are lower than those expected from IMR alone, and with ICKMR, fewer years of sampling can be conducted to obtain sufficient precision in estimates of abundance. This work demonstrates the utility of ICKMR and could be applicable across a variety of taxa.
Title: Combining individual and close‐kin mark–recapture to design an effective wildlife population survey
Description:
Abstract Close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) is a promising approach for assessing population size of species that have been difficult to survey using more traditional methods.
Here, we combine individual and close‐kin mark–recapture in a single modeling framework (ICKMR) and provide an example of study design using this approach for Pacific walrus ( Odobenus rosmarus divergens ).
We develop the ICKMR model and test it using simulated datasets, then use properties of the pseudo‐likelihood to investigate the expected precision in estimates of abundance with different proposed survey designs.
Our motivating example, the Pacific walrus, is an ice‐associated marine mammal found in the Bering and Chukchi seas, where it is an important resource for Indigenous peoples.
Pacific walrus abundance declined in the late 20th century, and it is currently a species of conservation concern due to potential impacts of climate change, particularly the loss of sea ice.
To reduce uncertainty in population size estimates, researchers undertook a genetic mark–recapture sampling campaign from 2013 to 2017 and collected tissue samples from over 8000 individuals.
Another campaign of a similar scale is ongoing (2023–2028).
While sample collection was designed for individual mark–recapture, advances in CKMR methods and associated molecular techniques mean that these samples could also be suitable for CKMR.
The advantages of CKMR over mark–recapture include an increased effective sample size (because each individual tags itself and its parents, siblings, and offspring) and additional insights into demographic quantities of interest.
To make best use of genetic samples, we combine individual mark–recapture (IMR) with CKMR (ICKMR) and investigate whether different sampling strategies can increase precision in estimates of abundance.
Our modeling approach includes special considerations for walrus life history, including a multi‐year inter‐birth interval.
We found that expected coefficients of variation (CVs) of the ICKMR estimates of abundance, adult female survival, juvenile female survival, and proportion of breeding females are lower than those expected from IMR alone, and with ICKMR, fewer years of sampling can be conducted to obtain sufficient precision in estimates of abundance.
This work demonstrates the utility of ICKMR and could be applicable across a variety of taxa.

Related Results

Spatial close-kin mark-recapture methods to estimate dispersal parameters and barrier strength for mosquitoes
Spatial close-kin mark-recapture methods to estimate dispersal parameters and barrier strength for mosquitoes
AbstractClose-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) methods have recently been used to infer demographic parameters for several aquatic and terrestrial species. For mosquitoes, the spatial dis...
Close-kin mark-recapture methods to estimate demographic parameters of mosquitoes
Close-kin mark-recapture methods to estimate demographic parameters of mosquitoes
AbstractClose-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) methods have recently been used to infer demographic parameters such as census population size and survival for fish of interest to fisherie...
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
ABSTRACT Wildlife managers often need to estimate population abundance to make well‐informed decisions. However, obtaining such estimates can...
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
AbstractMonitoring big game populations is necessary for making well‐informed management decisions. In the eastern Sierra Nevada in California, USA, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)...
Cryptic Kin Selection: Kin Structure in Vertebrate Populations and Opportunities for Kin‐Directed Cooperation
Cryptic Kin Selection: Kin Structure in Vertebrate Populations and Opportunities for Kin‐Directed Cooperation
Abstract Animal societies of varying complexity have been the favoured testing ground for inclusive fitness theory, and there is now abundant evidence that kin se...
Kin and Non-Kin Connected Plants Benefit More Than Disconnected Kin and Non-Kin Plants under Nutrient-Competitive Environments
Kin and Non-Kin Connected Plants Benefit More Than Disconnected Kin and Non-Kin Plants under Nutrient-Competitive Environments
In the natural environment, plants grow and interact with both conspecific and heterospecific neighbours under different environmental conditions. In this study, we tested whether ...
Kin-Mediated Male Choice and Alternative Reproductive Tactics in Spider Mites
Kin-Mediated Male Choice and Alternative Reproductive Tactics in Spider Mites
Optimal outbreeding and kin selection theories state that the degree of kinship is a fundamental determinant in any mating system. However, the role of kinship in male choice and a...

Back to Top