Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

PATH-61. NGS DATA INFLUENCE ON CLINICIAN DECISION-MAKING ACROSS PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY

View through CrossRef
Abstract BACKGROUND Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely completed for systemic solid tumors; however, its utility is unclear in brain tumors. Our study sought to investigate and compare the impact of NGS on treatment decision-making for glioblastoma and other primary brain tumors. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted with patients at Northwestern University who were diagnosed with a primary brain tumor receiving NGS sequencing between October 2013 and February 2020. Tempus reports for each in-house sequencing event along with pertinent medical information from the electronic medical record (EMR) was extracted. Primary brain tumor types assessed included glioblastoma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and other rare subtypes (including meningioma, ependymoma, ganglioma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors, glioneuronal tumors, and CNS lymphomas). NGS-impacted decision-making was defined as a physician prescribing a targeted treatment that corresponded with an actionable mutation in the Tempus report. RESULTS NGS was completed in 261 patients with glioblastoma and 121 patients with other primary brain tumors. NGS impacted decision-making in 12.6% (33) of glioblastoma patients and 9.1% (11) of other brain tumor patients. These figures in grades 1-3 astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma were 9.1% (4 of 44) and 8.1% (3 of 37), respectively. NGS impacted treatment in 10.0% (4 of 40) of all remaining subtypes analyzed. Overall, NGS sequencing data influenced clinical decision-making 11.5% of the time across all brain tumor types. Across the 382 patients assessed, EGFR copy number gain or GOF mutations were targeted most often (52.3% of all mutations targeted), followed by BRAF (11.4%) and IDH1 (11.4%). CONCLUSIONS NGS influences treatment decisions less often in primary brain tumors compared to other systemic cancers; however, NGS should still be considered in primary brain tumor patients, as it impacts treatment decision-making across subtypes. As more targeted therapies become available for CNS tumors, the utility of NGS will only increase.
Title: PATH-61. NGS DATA INFLUENCE ON CLINICIAN DECISION-MAKING ACROSS PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS AT NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
Description:
Abstract BACKGROUND Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely completed for systemic solid tumors; however, its utility is unclear in brain tumors.
Our study sought to investigate and compare the impact of NGS on treatment decision-making for glioblastoma and other primary brain tumors.
METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted with patients at Northwestern University who were diagnosed with a primary brain tumor receiving NGS sequencing between October 2013 and February 2020.
Tempus reports for each in-house sequencing event along with pertinent medical information from the electronic medical record (EMR) was extracted.
Primary brain tumor types assessed included glioblastoma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and other rare subtypes (including meningioma, ependymoma, ganglioma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors, glioneuronal tumors, and CNS lymphomas).
NGS-impacted decision-making was defined as a physician prescribing a targeted treatment that corresponded with an actionable mutation in the Tempus report.
RESULTS NGS was completed in 261 patients with glioblastoma and 121 patients with other primary brain tumors.
NGS impacted decision-making in 12.
6% (33) of glioblastoma patients and 9.
1% (11) of other brain tumor patients.
These figures in grades 1-3 astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma were 9.
1% (4 of 44) and 8.
1% (3 of 37), respectively.
NGS impacted treatment in 10.
0% (4 of 40) of all remaining subtypes analyzed.
Overall, NGS sequencing data influenced clinical decision-making 11.
5% of the time across all brain tumor types.
Across the 382 patients assessed, EGFR copy number gain or GOF mutations were targeted most often (52.
3% of all mutations targeted), followed by BRAF (11.
4%) and IDH1 (11.
4%).
CONCLUSIONS NGS influences treatment decisions less often in primary brain tumors compared to other systemic cancers; however, NGS should still be considered in primary brain tumor patients, as it impacts treatment decision-making across subtypes.
As more targeted therapies become available for CNS tumors, the utility of NGS will only increase.

Related Results

Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash INTRODUCTION The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED] Gro-X Brain Reviews - Is Gro-X Brain A Scam? v1
[RETRACTED]➢Item Name - Gro-X Brain➢ Creation - Natural Organic Compound➢ Incidental Effects - NA➢ Accessibility - Online➢ Rating - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐➢ Click Here To Visit - Official Website - ...
Investigating the impact of NGS data availability on clinical decision-making in brain cancer.
Investigating the impact of NGS data availability on clinical decision-making in brain cancer.
2032 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cancer specimens is a valuable diagnostic tool that can provide detailed information regarding specific somatic genetic altera...
Actionable insights: Liquid NGS in community oncology practice.
Actionable insights: Liquid NGS in community oncology practice.
e15081 Background: Liquid-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an integral test alongside tissue biopsy for identifying actionabl...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...

Back to Top