Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choices
View through CrossRef
This study designs an adaptive experiment for efficiently estimating average treatment effect (ATEs). We consider an adaptive experiment where an experimenter sequentially samples an experimental unit from a covariate density decided by the experimenter and assigns a treatment. After assigning a treatment, the experimenter observes the corresponding outcome immediately. At the end of the experiment, the experimenter estimates an ATE using gathered samples. The objective of the experimenter is to estimate the ATE with a smaller asymptotic variance. Existing studies have designed experiments that adaptively optimize the propensity score (treatment-assignment probability). As a generalization of such an approach, we propose a framework under which an experimenter optimizes the covariate density, as well as the propensity score, and find that optimizing both covariate density and propensity score reduces the asymptotic variance more than optimizing only the propensity score. Based on this idea, in each round of our experiment, the experimenter optimizes the covariate density and propensity score based on past observations. To design an adaptive experiment, we first derive the efficient covariate density and propensity score that minimizes the semiparametric efficiency bound, a lower bound for the asymptotic variance given a fixed covariate density and a fixed propensity score. Next, we design an adaptive experiment using the efficient covariate density and propensity score sequentially estimated during the experiment. Lastly, we propose an ATE estimator whose asymptotic variance aligns with the minimized semiparametric efficiency bound.
Title: Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choices
Description:
This study designs an adaptive experiment for efficiently estimating average treatment effect (ATEs).
We consider an adaptive experiment where an experimenter sequentially samples an experimental unit from a covariate density decided by the experimenter and assigns a treatment.
After assigning a treatment, the experimenter observes the corresponding outcome immediately.
At the end of the experiment, the experimenter estimates an ATE using gathered samples.
The objective of the experimenter is to estimate the ATE with a smaller asymptotic variance.
Existing studies have designed experiments that adaptively optimize the propensity score (treatment-assignment probability).
As a generalization of such an approach, we propose a framework under which an experimenter optimizes the covariate density, as well as the propensity score, and find that optimizing both covariate density and propensity score reduces the asymptotic variance more than optimizing only the propensity score.
Based on this idea, in each round of our experiment, the experimenter optimizes the covariate density and propensity score based on past observations.
To design an adaptive experiment, we first derive the efficient covariate density and propensity score that minimizes the semiparametric efficiency bound, a lower bound for the asymptotic variance given a fixed covariate density and a fixed propensity score.
Next, we design an adaptive experiment using the efficient covariate density and propensity score sequentially estimated during the experiment.
Lastly, we propose an ATE estimator whose asymptotic variance aligns with the minimized semiparametric efficiency bound.
Related Results
TarDis: Achieving Robust and Structured Disentanglement of Multiple Covariates
TarDis: Achieving Robust and Structured Disentanglement of Multiple Covariates
Summary
Addressing challenges in domain invariance within single-cell genomics necessitates innovative strategies to manage the heterogeneity of ...
Model-based optimal randomization procedure for treatment–covariate interaction tests
Model-based optimal randomization procedure for treatment–covariate interaction tests
Linear models are extensively used in the analysis of clinical trials. However, required model assumptions (e.g. homoscedasticity) may not be satisfied in practice, resulting in lo...
Algorithms and Complexities of Matching Variants in Covariate Balancing
Algorithms and Complexities of Matching Variants in Covariate Balancing
In an observational study there are two disjointed groups of samples, one of treatment samples and the other of control samples. Each of the samples is characterized by several obs...
Regression models with an interval-censored covariate
Regression models with an interval-censored covariate
El análisis de supervivencia trata de la evaluación estadística de variables que miden el tiempo transcurrido hasta un evento de interés. Una particularidad que ha de considerar el...
Adaptive Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Vehicle Steer-by-Wire under Communication Time Delays
Adaptive Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Vehicle Steer-by-Wire under Communication Time Delays
In this paper, an adaptive active disturbance rejection control is newly designed for precise angular steering position tracking of the uncertain and nonlinear SBW system with time...
Covariate adjustment in randomized trials: An overview
Covariate adjustment in randomized trials: An overview
This article aims to provide a practical overview of the various methods of covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials leading to recommendation for future practice. Topics...
A Multiple Imputation Workflow for Handling Missing Covariate Data in Pharmacometrics Modeling
A Multiple Imputation Workflow for Handling Missing Covariate Data in Pharmacometrics Modeling
ABSTRACT
Covariate missingness is a prevalent issue in pharmacometrics modeling. Incorrect handling of missing covariates can lead to biased parameter estimates, ...

