Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clovis Technology

View through CrossRef
AbstractColonising hunter‐gatherer populations in North and Central America at the end of the Pleistocene utilised Clovis technology. Clovis technology is known for ‘fluted’ flaked stone points that were used to hunt prey and served as knives, but it also included the production, use and discard of a diversity of other implements made from stone, bone and other materials. Clovis technology lasted for several centuries, perhaps as long as a millennium and a half. Clovis technology shares some similarities with Siberian Paleolithic technology, which is consistent with current genetic evidence, indicating that ancestors of the people using Clovis technology originated in Asia. Clovis technology, as archaeologists generally recognise it, likely emerged piecemeal as people dispersed into the New World – some aspects of it can be tied to ancestry in Siberia, while other aspects are likely indigenous to North and Central America. Several studies have shown that Clovis technology was subjected to both micro‐ and macroevolutionary forces.Key Concepts‘Clovis technology’ is just an archaeologist's shorthand to refer to what is in actuality an inferred, fuzzy set of human–tool interactions found across North and Central America during the terminal Pleistocene.There is a diversity of Clovis tools made from stone, bone and other materials.Evidence for Clovis technology can be found across the lower 48 states of the United States, throughout southern Canada, and Central America.The ancestors of people who used Clovis technology came from Asia.What archaeologists generally recognise, and refer to, as Clovis technology likely emerged piecemeal as people from Asia dispersed into the New World.Clovis technology evolved at both the micro‐ and macroevolutionary scales.
Title: Clovis Technology
Description:
AbstractColonising hunter‐gatherer populations in North and Central America at the end of the Pleistocene utilised Clovis technology.
Clovis technology is known for ‘fluted’ flaked stone points that were used to hunt prey and served as knives, but it also included the production, use and discard of a diversity of other implements made from stone, bone and other materials.
Clovis technology lasted for several centuries, perhaps as long as a millennium and a half.
Clovis technology shares some similarities with Siberian Paleolithic technology, which is consistent with current genetic evidence, indicating that ancestors of the people using Clovis technology originated in Asia.
Clovis technology, as archaeologists generally recognise it, likely emerged piecemeal as people dispersed into the New World – some aspects of it can be tied to ancestry in Siberia, while other aspects are likely indigenous to North and Central America.
Several studies have shown that Clovis technology was subjected to both micro‐ and macroevolutionary forces.
Key Concepts‘Clovis technology’ is just an archaeologist's shorthand to refer to what is in actuality an inferred, fuzzy set of human–tool interactions found across North and Central America during the terminal Pleistocene.
There is a diversity of Clovis tools made from stone, bone and other materials.
Evidence for Clovis technology can be found across the lower 48 states of the United States, throughout southern Canada, and Central America.
The ancestors of people who used Clovis technology came from Asia.
What archaeologists generally recognise, and refer to, as Clovis technology likely emerged piecemeal as people from Asia dispersed into the New World.
Clovis technology evolved at both the micro‐ and macroevolutionary scales.

Related Results

New Perspectives on the Clovis vs. Pre-Clovis Controversy
New Perspectives on the Clovis vs. Pre-Clovis Controversy
We consider the Clovis vs. pre-Clovis debate from three perspectives: migration models; petroglyph and surface-artifact ages; and scientific method. First, we test the hypothesis t...
The Clovis Occupation of the Dietz Site (35LK1529), Lake County, Oregon, and its Bearing on the Adaptive Diversity of Clovis Foragers
The Clovis Occupation of the Dietz Site (35LK1529), Lake County, Oregon, and its Bearing on the Adaptive Diversity of Clovis Foragers
Archaeological models of Clovis adaptations are divided between those that argue for a single hunting adaptation characterized by high residential mobility without fixed territorie...
The Social Groups and Decline of a Southwestern Clovis Network
The Social Groups and Decline of a Southwestern Clovis Network
Abstract Shared lithic raw materials were used to map a ca. 13,000-year-old Clovis regional social network, labelled the Cochise Clovis network, that connected the Murray S...
L'image de Clovis dans le royaume de France entre 1250 et 1550
L'image de Clovis dans le royaume de France entre 1250 et 1550
Jusqu'à la fin du XIIe siècle, la vie de Clovis, roi mérovingien et premier roi chrétien qui a régné sur le royaume franc sûrement à partir de 481 et jusqu'à sa mort, le 27 novembr...
Ecos Armoriais: entrevista com Clóvis Pereira
Ecos Armoriais: entrevista com Clóvis Pereira
Clóvis Pereira é um compositor brasileiro. Destaca-se por enfatizar em suas composições características que estão presentes nas culturas populares do Nordeste. Esse olhar voltado p...
Kimmswick: A Clovis-Mastodon Association in Eastern Missouri
Kimmswick: A Clovis-Mastodon Association in Eastern Missouri
Stone tools characteristic of the Clovis culture have been found in direct association with bones of the American mastodon at Kimmswick, Missouri. The vertebrate fauna from Clovis ...

Back to Top