Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957

View through CrossRef
This article analyzes the process of institutionalization of the Bulgarian circus be-tween 1944 and 1957. The appreciation of circus as “an equal member of the large family of socialist arts” was rooted in a belief that it was a democratic spectacle which transcended social divisions and classes. The source of the perception of the circus as an instrument of social change can be traced to pre-war Soviet tradition, when the circus became not only a tool of state cultural policy, but also inspired the most important creators of literary and theater avant-garde. In post-war Bulgaria, in order to improve the quality of performances, interinstitutional cooperation of the circus with literary and theater circles was initiated, and with the purchase of circuses by the state, numerous regulations were introduced in the profession of a circus artist. This purchase was not synonymous with nationalization: the state bought the circuses from the hands of their pre-war owners, allowing them to continue to perform strategic functions in the circuses.At the same time, despite deep institutional changes, the circus after 1944 main-tained its semi-peripheral status of an entertainment spectacle, not worth considering on the part of intellectual elites and unfit for the project of national high art. It is this peripheral potential of the circus as a spectacle not shaped by the refinement of the elites, that opens up new research perspectives which allow us to view the circus as a laboratory of social and cultural change. As a nomadic travelling institution, the circus crossed geographical boundaries and communicated with viewers from cities and villages, as well as representatives of various social groups and strata. On the other hand, multiethnic, international environment of the circus was a space for inten-sive transfer and intercultural dialogue, both in the artistic dimension and in the sphere of everyday interpersonal practices.
Southwest University Neofit Rilski
Title: The Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Circus between 1944 and 1957
Description:
This article analyzes the process of institutionalization of the Bulgarian circus be-tween 1944 and 1957.
The appreciation of circus as “an equal member of the large family of socialist arts” was rooted in a belief that it was a democratic spectacle which transcended social divisions and classes.
The source of the perception of the circus as an instrument of social change can be traced to pre-war Soviet tradition, when the circus became not only a tool of state cultural policy, but also inspired the most important creators of literary and theater avant-garde.
In post-war Bulgaria, in order to improve the quality of performances, interinstitutional cooperation of the circus with literary and theater circles was initiated, and with the purchase of circuses by the state, numerous regulations were introduced in the profession of a circus artist.
This purchase was not synonymous with nationalization: the state bought the circuses from the hands of their pre-war owners, allowing them to continue to perform strategic functions in the circuses.
At the same time, despite deep institutional changes, the circus after 1944 main-tained its semi-peripheral status of an entertainment spectacle, not worth considering on the part of intellectual elites and unfit for the project of national high art.
It is this peripheral potential of the circus as a spectacle not shaped by the refinement of the elites, that opens up new research perspectives which allow us to view the circus as a laboratory of social and cultural change.
As a nomadic travelling institution, the circus crossed geographical boundaries and communicated with viewers from cities and villages, as well as representatives of various social groups and strata.
On the other hand, multiethnic, international environment of the circus was a space for inten-sive transfer and intercultural dialogue, both in the artistic dimension and in the sphere of everyday interpersonal practices.

Related Results

Circus Training for Autistic Children: Difference, Creativity, and Community
Circus Training for Autistic Children: Difference, Creativity, and Community
Circus training can benefit children diagnosed on the autistic spectrum and their families. In 2010, as Head Trainer at Flipside Circus in Brisbane, Kristy Seymour developed a meth...
Circus Workshop in the chid Psychiatry
Circus Workshop in the chid Psychiatry
The following paper is about the possible psychological effects of social circus, and our experiences with teaching circus methods in children psychiatry. In the beginning the pape...
Two Questions on the Circus Flaminius
Two Questions on the Circus Flaminius
Were ludi circenses ever held in the Circus Flaminius as they were in the Circus Maximus?The evidence is as follows.1. Varro LL v 153–4: Locus idem circus maximus dictus, quod circ...
London, Cadogan Hall and King's Place: Second London Festival of Bulgarian Culture
London, Cadogan Hall and King's Place: Second London Festival of Bulgarian Culture
One of the most enjoyable characteristics of London musical life is that it is peopled by a generous number of foreigners who, every so often, take it upon themselves to enlighten ...
Send in the Clowness: The Problematic Origins of Female Circus Clowns
Send in the Clowness: The Problematic Origins of Female Circus Clowns
Historically, clowns have always been trained “on the job”: one was born or adopted into a circus dynasty or else ran away to join the circus, serving an apprenticeship. Breaking w...
The Imperturbable Seriousness of the Circus Buffoon: The Shakespearean Clown on the Threshold of Modern Comedy
The Imperturbable Seriousness of the Circus Buffoon: The Shakespearean Clown on the Threshold of Modern Comedy
Abstract Around the middle of the nineteenth century, there arose a type of circus performer in England called ‘Shakespearean clowns’. These clowns constituted a tra...
Electric Circus, Electric Ear and the Intermedia Center in Late-1960s New York
Electric Circus, Electric Ear and the Intermedia Center in Late-1960s New York
Composer Morton Subotnick moved to New York in 1966 for a brief but productive stay, establishing a small but notable electronic music studio affiliated with New York University. I...
Flights of Fancy and the Dissolution of Shakespearean Space-Time in Angela Carter’s Nights at the Circus
Flights of Fancy and the Dissolution of Shakespearean Space-Time in Angela Carter’s Nights at the Circus
While much attention has been paid to Angela Carter’s intertextual appropriation of Shakespeare and her interrogation of the patriarchal ideology at work in his representations of ...

Back to Top