Javascript must be enabled to continue!
International law concerning ocean observing
View through CrossRef
There exists a clear need for the collection of marine data for a wide range of purposes. Traditionally, states have attempted to regulate this form of data collection – or ocean observing – by categorising it as marine scientific research. Yet, there are substantial distinctions between marine scientific research and sustained ocean observing. The purpose can be very different, and the former is often dependent on the latter. Moreover, the application of regulation for marine scientific research to sustained ocean observing creates barriers to the expeditious and efficient collection of marine data. This is mainly because the international rules applicable to marine scientific research have been created decades ago, when mostly research vessels were used to collect data. Since then, the development of many new technologies and observation instruments has occurred. Regulations are no longer always able to cover the practical reality of ocean observing. A distinction in regulating marine scientific research and sustained ocean observing would be beneficial in many regards and follow the trend that many forms of ocean observing are already exempted from regulation under marine scientific research. Moreover, this would make it easier for states to fulfill their international legal obligations, such as under the Paris Agreement and the new Agreement on Biological Diversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction.
Title: International law concerning ocean observing
Description:
There exists a clear need for the collection of marine data for a wide range of purposes.
Traditionally, states have attempted to regulate this form of data collection – or ocean observing – by categorising it as marine scientific research.
Yet, there are substantial distinctions between marine scientific research and sustained ocean observing.
The purpose can be very different, and the former is often dependent on the latter.
Moreover, the application of regulation for marine scientific research to sustained ocean observing creates barriers to the expeditious and efficient collection of marine data.
This is mainly because the international rules applicable to marine scientific research have been created decades ago, when mostly research vessels were used to collect data.
Since then, the development of many new technologies and observation instruments has occurred.
Regulations are no longer always able to cover the practical reality of ocean observing.
A distinction in regulating marine scientific research and sustained ocean observing would be beneficial in many regards and follow the trend that many forms of ocean observing are already exempted from regulation under marine scientific research.
Moreover, this would make it easier for states to fulfill their international legal obligations, such as under the Paris Agreement and the new Agreement on Biological Diversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction.
Related Results
Access impact of observations
Access impact of observations
The accuracy of the Copernicus Marine Environment and Monitoring Service (CMEMS) ocean analysis and forecasts highly depend on the availability and quality of observations to be as...
Closing the Ocean Science Gap: Empowering Africa towards Ocean Innovation and Global Ocean-Based Solutions
Closing the Ocean Science Gap: Empowering Africa towards Ocean Innovation and Global Ocean-Based Solutions
The global ocean science community faces critical inequities that hinder Africa’s participation in research and innovation, resulting in limited African contributions to ocean-base...
The Ocean Race Learning Program: Advancing Ocean Literacy and Stewardship Through a Global Sporting Platform, Lucy Hunt & Rebecca White, The Ocean Race
The Ocean Race Learning Program: Advancing Ocean Literacy and Stewardship Through a Global Sporting Platform, Lucy Hunt & Rebecca White, The Ocean Race
The Ocean Race, renowned as the world’s most challenging round-the-world sailing competition, has developed a global Learning Programme supporting ocean literacy, environmental adv...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
An International Rule of Law
An International Rule of Law
The “international rule of law” is an elusive concept. Under this heading, mainly two variations are being discussed: The international rule of law “proper” and an “internationaliz...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry J H Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry and Others, and Related Appeals
Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry J H Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry and Others, and Related Appeals
International organizations — Personality — Concept of international legal personality — Whether organization a legal entity distinct from its members — Whether personality of orga...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...

