Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patients with stage II/III rectal cancer that were treated with IORT in a regional Russian university center due to limited access to EBRT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that were diagnosed with locally-advanced rectal cancer and underwent surgery from December 2012 to October 2016 at a regional oncological center in Russia (Krasnodar). During this period, access to EBRT was limited due to a temporary lack of a sufficient number of EBRT facilities. Patients unable to travel to a distant radiotherapy site received IORT alone, those that could travel received neoadjuvant external beam (chemo-) radiotherapy. Factors of interest were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, resection status, surgery type and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. We assessed local progression-free survival (L-PFS), PFS and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 92 (53.5%) were treated with IORT alone (median dose: 15 Gy [8.4–17 Gy]) and 80 (46.5%) received both neoadjuvant EBRT (median dose: 50.4 Gy [40–50.4 Gy]) and IORT (median dose: 15 Gy [15–17 Gy]). The median age was 65 years [33–82]. The median follow-up was 23 months [0–63 months]. The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5.4%. Local PFS at 4 years was comparable with 59.4% in the IORT group and 65.4% in the IORT/EBRT group (p = 0.70). Similarly, there was no difference in OS or PFS (p = 0.66, p = 0.51, respectively). Conclusions IORT is a valuable option for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer in the absence of access to EBRT.
Title: Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
Description:
Abstract Background Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer.
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors.
We here report on patients with stage II/III rectal cancer that were treated with IORT in a regional Russian university center due to limited access to EBRT.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that were diagnosed with locally-advanced rectal cancer and underwent surgery from December 2012 to October 2016 at a regional oncological center in Russia (Krasnodar).
During this period, access to EBRT was limited due to a temporary lack of a sufficient number of EBRT facilities.
Patients unable to travel to a distant radiotherapy site received IORT alone, those that could travel received neoadjuvant external beam (chemo-) radiotherapy.
Factors of interest were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, resection status, surgery type and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.
We assessed local progression-free survival (L-PFS), PFS and overall survival (OS).
Results A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis.
Of those, 92 (53.
5%) were treated with IORT alone (median dose: 15 Gy [8.
4–17 Gy]) and 80 (46.
5%) received both neoadjuvant EBRT (median dose: 50.
4 Gy [40–50.
4 Gy]) and IORT (median dose: 15 Gy [15–17 Gy]).
The median age was 65 years [33–82].
The median follow-up was 23 months [0–63 months].
The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5.
4%.
Local PFS at 4 years was comparable with 59.
4% in the IORT group and 65.
4% in the IORT/EBRT group (p = 0.
70).
Similarly, there was no difference in OS or PFS (p = 0.
66, p = 0.
51, respectively).
Conclusions IORT is a valuable option for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer in the absence of access to EBRT.

Related Results

Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that mimics carcinoma. GM can coexist with breast cancer (BC), though the relationship rema...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Developing the advanced dosimetry of linac beam radiotherapy
Developing the advanced dosimetry of linac beam radiotherapy
<p dir="ltr">Photon beams remains the most widely used modality for radiotherapy of cancer worldwide. Continued technological development has enabled increasingly conformal t...

Back to Top