Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Justification Based on Rational Training

View through CrossRef
This chapter produces a socio-cultural critique of the ‘rational training’ workplace e-learning scenario. In this workplace e-learning scenario, workplace e-learning for workplace adult education training is used to justify the workforce through standards, categories, and measures. The alienating effects that arise out of this rush towards technocentric rationalization of the workforce through workplace e-learning are also discussed. These are the unintended and paradoxically opposite outcomes to the effects actually anticipated. An exploratory case study problematizes the unquestioned acceptance of the technological artefacts of workplace e-learning within organizations as credible sources to provide a rationale to justify workforces within workplaces. This approach critiques the presumption of infallibility of the technological artefacts of workplace e-learning; considers the short-comings of the conceiving of workplace e-learning as ‘finished’; and, reveals the ‘underdetermined’ nature of workplace e-learning technological artefacts. Socio-cultural insensitivity from workplace e-learning, in this scenario, comes from the basic, unquestioned assumption that workers are essentially socially flawed and culturally inferior; accountable for overcoming their sociocultural flaws and inferiorities; and, need to be justified by workplace e-learning, through standards, categories, and measures, to meet the expectations of the infallible and commodified workplace. A workplace e-learning that is deployed to justify the workforce, through standardization, categorization, and measurement, all result in a workforce being alienated from: (a) each other (worker-worker alienation); (b) their work (worker-work alienation); and, (c) their personal identities and sense of self (worker-identity alienation). Social rationalization is not the means to social justice in the workplace when it comes to workplace adult education and training, workplace e-learning, and the diverse and multicultural learning needs of a global cohort of adult learners.
Title: Justification Based on Rational Training
Description:
This chapter produces a socio-cultural critique of the ‘rational training’ workplace e-learning scenario.
In this workplace e-learning scenario, workplace e-learning for workplace adult education training is used to justify the workforce through standards, categories, and measures.
The alienating effects that arise out of this rush towards technocentric rationalization of the workforce through workplace e-learning are also discussed.
These are the unintended and paradoxically opposite outcomes to the effects actually anticipated.
An exploratory case study problematizes the unquestioned acceptance of the technological artefacts of workplace e-learning within organizations as credible sources to provide a rationale to justify workforces within workplaces.
This approach critiques the presumption of infallibility of the technological artefacts of workplace e-learning; considers the short-comings of the conceiving of workplace e-learning as ‘finished’; and, reveals the ‘underdetermined’ nature of workplace e-learning technological artefacts.
Socio-cultural insensitivity from workplace e-learning, in this scenario, comes from the basic, unquestioned assumption that workers are essentially socially flawed and culturally inferior; accountable for overcoming their sociocultural flaws and inferiorities; and, need to be justified by workplace e-learning, through standards, categories, and measures, to meet the expectations of the infallible and commodified workplace.
A workplace e-learning that is deployed to justify the workforce, through standardization, categorization, and measurement, all result in a workforce being alienated from: (a) each other (worker-worker alienation); (b) their work (worker-work alienation); and, (c) their personal identities and sense of self (worker-identity alienation).
Social rationalization is not the means to social justice in the workplace when it comes to workplace adult education and training, workplace e-learning, and the diverse and multicultural learning needs of a global cohort of adult learners.

Related Results

Augustine of Hippo: On Justification by Faith
Augustine of Hippo: On Justification by Faith
This study aims to retrieve Augustine of Hippo’s view of ‘justification by faith’ from his theological writings from the 390s to the end of his career. Significant sources are his ...
Les présupposés du libéralisme politique : quelle justification ? John Rawls et l'hypothèse herméneutique
Les présupposés du libéralisme politique : quelle justification ? John Rawls et l'hypothèse herméneutique
Pour de nombreux architectes du libéralisme politique contemporain, la neutralité constitue une caractéristique définitionnelle du libéralisme politique. Il est pourtant clair que ...
OPTIMALISASI PERENCANAAN PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DAN PELATIHAN PADA PUSDIKLAT PAJAK Vissia Dewi Haptari
OPTIMALISASI PERENCANAAN PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DAN PELATIHAN PADA PUSDIKLAT PAJAK Vissia Dewi Haptari
Education and training (training) is an integral part of human resource development is always oriented to the improvement of the quality and capabilities of human resources. The de...
Trooping the (School) Colour
Trooping the (School) Colour
Introduction Throughout the early and mid-twentieth century, cadet training was a feature of many secondary schools and educational establishments across Australia, with countless ...
Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Athletes’ Justification of Cheating in Sport: Relationship with Moral Disengagement in Sport and Personal Factors
Research background and hypothesis. The research focus is on university athletes’ justification of cheating in sport. We hypothesised that moral disengagement would be more linked ...
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...
On Labelling Statements in Multi-Labelling Argumentation
On Labelling Statements in Multi-Labelling Argumentation
In computational models of argumentation, argument justification has attracted more attention than statement justification, and significant sensitivity losses are identifiable when...

Back to Top