Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Leading Advising in the Age of Intelligent Systems: Human Judgment, AI, and Student Retention

View through CrossRef
Higher education institutions are under sustained pressure to improve student retention and enrollment while managing increasing complexity in advising demands, institutional accountability, and learner diversity. Traditional academic advising models—often constrained by staffing limitations and reactive intervention structures—have proven insufficient in addressing these challenges at scale. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising augmentation to advising systems, offering predictive analytics, conversational agents, and data-driven decision support. However, existing research has largely emphasized technical functionality rather than the leadership and organizational conditions required for effective and ethical implementation. This study investigates how AI-enhanced academic advising can be strategically led and institutionalized to support student retention and enrollment outcomes while maintaining a student-centered, developmental ethos. Employing a convergent mixed-methods design, the study integrates qualitative non-participant observation with institutional analytics at Abu Dhabi University (ADU). The analysis is grounded in Systems Thinking and Student Development Theory to examine how technological, human, and organizational subsystems interact in practice. Findings indicate that AI tools improve efficiency by automating routine advising tasks and enabling early identification of at-risk students. However, their effectiveness depends fundamentally on leadership vision, advisor training, ethical governance, and integration with human advising practices. Human advisors remain essential for contextual judgment, emotional support, and developmental mentoring. The study proposes a leadership-driven hybrid advising model in which AI enhances—but does not replace—human expertise. The findings contribute to the emerging literature on AI-enabled educational leadership and offer practical guidance for institutions seeking to align innovation with student development and institutional strategy.
Title: Leading Advising in the Age of Intelligent Systems: Human Judgment, AI, and Student Retention
Description:
Higher education institutions are under sustained pressure to improve student retention and enrollment while managing increasing complexity in advising demands, institutional accountability, and learner diversity.
Traditional academic advising models—often constrained by staffing limitations and reactive intervention structures—have proven insufficient in addressing these challenges at scale.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising augmentation to advising systems, offering predictive analytics, conversational agents, and data-driven decision support.
However, existing research has largely emphasized technical functionality rather than the leadership and organizational conditions required for effective and ethical implementation.
This study investigates how AI-enhanced academic advising can be strategically led and institutionalized to support student retention and enrollment outcomes while maintaining a student-centered, developmental ethos.
Employing a convergent mixed-methods design, the study integrates qualitative non-participant observation with institutional analytics at Abu Dhabi University (ADU).
The analysis is grounded in Systems Thinking and Student Development Theory to examine how technological, human, and organizational subsystems interact in practice.
Findings indicate that AI tools improve efficiency by automating routine advising tasks and enabling early identification of at-risk students.
However, their effectiveness depends fundamentally on leadership vision, advisor training, ethical governance, and integration with human advising practices.
Human advisors remain essential for contextual judgment, emotional support, and developmental mentoring.
The study proposes a leadership-driven hybrid advising model in which AI enhances—but does not replace—human expertise.
The findings contribute to the emerging literature on AI-enabled educational leadership and offer practical guidance for institutions seeking to align innovation with student development and institutional strategy.

Related Results

​​Autonomy in Language Learning: Advising in Action.
​​Autonomy in Language Learning: Advising in Action.
This book explores advising in action by focusing on advising programmes and advising tools. There are 11 chapters including a foreword by Christopher Candlin. Chapters in the ‘adv...
Advising as Servant Leadership: Investigating Student Satisfaction
Advising as Servant Leadership: Investigating Student Satisfaction
Student satisfaction with advising is positively linked to first-year student retention and sophomore persistence to their senior year. However, inconsistencies in the advising lit...
Validating Faculty Advising Through Assessment
Validating Faculty Advising Through Assessment
Faculty members take on the role of primary advisors on many small campuses. Many report feeling underprepared for the advising role. Assessment of academic advising can raise the ...
Veterinary Professions Advising Center: an innovative approach to preveterinary advising for Animal Science students
Veterinary Professions Advising Center: an innovative approach to preveterinary advising for Animal Science students
Abstract Veterinary Professions Advising Center (VetPAC) is a unique undergraduate advising center that combines Career Center services with preprofessional advising...
How Perceived Career Advising Initiates Career Orientation of UAS Undergraduates in China: Career Exploration as a Mediator
How Perceived Career Advising Initiates Career Orientation of UAS Undergraduates in China: Career Exploration as a Mediator
In the context of universal higher education and labor market polarization, undergraduates in universities of applied sciences (UAS) face growing challenges in forming career orien...
Robo academic advisor: Can chatbots and artificial intelligence replace human interaction?
Robo academic advisor: Can chatbots and artificial intelligence replace human interaction?
<b>Purpose</b>: Chatbots and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to alleviate some of the challenges faced by humans. Faculties frequently swamped with teac...
Concepts and Iconography of Afterlife Judgment in the Religions of the Ancient West Asian Mediterranean Cultural Sphere
Concepts and Iconography of Afterlife Judgment in the Religions of the Ancient West Asian Mediterranean Cultural Sphere
This study aims to analyze the concept of afterlife judgment and its iconographic representations as developed within the ancient West Asia-Mediterranean cultural sphere. In the af...

Back to Top