Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

EFFECT OF MYOFASCIAL RELEASE WITH OR WITHOUT TAPING IN THE PATIENTS WITH HEEL SPUR; A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

View through CrossRef
Background: Plantar heel pain associated with heel spur is a common musculoskeletal problem that often limits walking, standing tolerance, and daily activity. Myofascial release is used to reduce fascial restriction and improve tissue mobility, while kinesiology taping is applied to support foot mechanics and unload the plantar fascia. Although both approaches are used in conservative rehabilitation, their combined clinical value in heel spur-related pain remains insufficiently established, particularly for function and ankle mobility. Objective: To compare the effects of myofascial release with and without kinesiology taping on pain, foot function, and active ankle range of motion in patients with heel spur. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 38 participants with heel spur-related plantar heel pain. Participants were randomly allocated into Group A and Group B, with 19 participants in each group. Group A received myofascial release with standardized physiotherapy, while Group B received myofascial release with kinesiology taping along with the same baseline physiotherapy protocol. The intervention was delivered twice weekly for six weeks, comprising 12 sessions. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, foot function through the Foot Function Index, and active dorsiflexion and plantar flexion range of motion using a universal goniometer. Data were recorded at baseline and after intervention. Results: Final analysis included 18 participants in Group A and 17 participants in Group B. Median VAS reduced from 7.00 to 4.00 in Group A and from 7.00 to 3.00 in Group B. Pain improved significantly within both groups, but post-treatment between-group difference was not significant. FFI improved from 70.61 ± 9.27 to 40.72 ± 11.51 in Group A and from 71.41 ± 11.97 to 29.06 ± 12.95 in Group B. Dorsiflexion increased from 9.73° ± 1.69° to 14.51° ± 2.03° in Group A and from 9.64° ± 2.16° to 17.51° ± 2.19° in Group B. Plantar flexion increased from 36.13° ± 1.57° to 43.77° ± 1.97° in Group A and from 35.42° ± 2.21° to 47.22° ± 2.66° in Group B. Conclusion: Myofascial release was effective for improving heel spur-related symptoms, while the addition of kinesiology taping produced greater improvement in foot function and ankle mobility. A combined rehabilitation approach may therefore offer better functional recovery in patients with heel spur. Keywords: Athletic Tape; Fasciitis, Plantar; Heel Spur; Musculoskeletal Manipulations; Pain Measurement; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome.
Title: EFFECT OF MYOFASCIAL RELEASE WITH OR WITHOUT TAPING IN THE PATIENTS WITH HEEL SPUR; A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Description:
Background: Plantar heel pain associated with heel spur is a common musculoskeletal problem that often limits walking, standing tolerance, and daily activity.
Myofascial release is used to reduce fascial restriction and improve tissue mobility, while kinesiology taping is applied to support foot mechanics and unload the plantar fascia.
Although both approaches are used in conservative rehabilitation, their combined clinical value in heel spur-related pain remains insufficiently established, particularly for function and ankle mobility.
Objective: To compare the effects of myofascial release with and without kinesiology taping on pain, foot function, and active ankle range of motion in patients with heel spur.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 38 participants with heel spur-related plantar heel pain.
Participants were randomly allocated into Group A and Group B, with 19 participants in each group.
Group A received myofascial release with standardized physiotherapy, while Group B received myofascial release with kinesiology taping along with the same baseline physiotherapy protocol.
The intervention was delivered twice weekly for six weeks, comprising 12 sessions.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, foot function through the Foot Function Index, and active dorsiflexion and plantar flexion range of motion using a universal goniometer.
Data were recorded at baseline and after intervention.
Results: Final analysis included 18 participants in Group A and 17 participants in Group B.
Median VAS reduced from 7.
00 to 4.
00 in Group A and from 7.
00 to 3.
00 in Group B.
Pain improved significantly within both groups, but post-treatment between-group difference was not significant.
FFI improved from 70.
61 ± 9.
27 to 40.
72 ± 11.
51 in Group A and from 71.
41 ± 11.
97 to 29.
06 ± 12.
95 in Group B.
Dorsiflexion increased from 9.
73° ± 1.
69° to 14.
51° ± 2.
03° in Group A and from 9.
64° ± 2.
16° to 17.
51° ± 2.
19° in Group B.
Plantar flexion increased from 36.
13° ± 1.
57° to 43.
77° ± 1.
97° in Group A and from 35.
42° ± 2.
21° to 47.
22° ± 2.
66° in Group B.
Conclusion: Myofascial release was effective for improving heel spur-related symptoms, while the addition of kinesiology taping produced greater improvement in foot function and ankle mobility.
A combined rehabilitation approach may therefore offer better functional recovery in patients with heel spur.
Keywords: Athletic Tape; Fasciitis, Plantar; Heel Spur; Musculoskeletal Manipulations; Pain Measurement; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome.

Related Results

Pengaruh Myofacial Release Kombinasi dengan Hold Relax terhadap Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Pengaruh Myofacial Release Kombinasi dengan Hold Relax terhadap Myofacial Pain Syndrome
AbstrakPekerja garment khususnya pada bagian operator jahit merupakan salah satu pekerjaan yang beresiko terkena gangguan myofascial pain syndrome otot upper trapezius. Myofascial ...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Heel Pain and Calcaneal Enthesophytes: A Radiological Evaluation
Heel Pain and Calcaneal Enthesophytes: A Radiological Evaluation
Introduction: The calcaneal spur is the leading cause of heel pain. While prior anatomical studies have often utilized cadaveric specimens, there is a dearth of data correlating he...
Almond Spur Autonomy: Leaf Growth, Floral Initiation and Spur Survival
Almond Spur Autonomy: Leaf Growth, Floral Initiation and Spur Survival
Spurs are the primary bearing unit in mature `Nonpareil' almond ( Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb) trees. Our objective was to determine whe...
Efficacy of Therapeutic Ultrasound vs Myofascial Release in Treating Trigger Points of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Comparative Study
Efficacy of Therapeutic Ultrasound vs Myofascial Release in Treating Trigger Points of Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Comparative Study
Background:  A pre-post experimental comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound versus myofascial release in treating trigger points associated with myo...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

Back to Top