Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The image of J. V. Stalin in modern party discourse: “the shadow”
View through CrossRef
Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin remains one of the most talked about political figures of the XX century. There is yet no consensus on the state level about his activity: the elite tries to avoid the assessment of controversial and ambiguous periods of national history. Modern political parties develop the image of Stalin within the framework of development of their historical policy. The article analyzes the attitude of the parties towards the Soviet leader, determines the key peculiarities of constructing the image, and ways of using references to the “Stalinist time” in the political struggle of modern Russia. Research methodology employs the legal documents of the most popular parties, speeches and publications of their leaders. The author concludes on the absence of unified approach of modern parties towards the figure of J. V. Stalin. Among large political parties, the “United Russia” has no unequivocal opinion on Stalin, while the rest attribute themselves to apologists and critics. The first group (the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, All-Russian Political Party “Rodina”, “Communists of Russia”) is characterized with high mythologization of the image of the “leader of peoples”, creating the image of the ideal leader, statesman and defender of interest of the country, omitting or justifying all negative actions. The critics of J. V. Stalin differ in their approaches: such parties as LDPR, “Just Russia”, and partially “United Russia”) believe that the crimes of that time are sufficiently studied; while “PARNA” and “Yabloko” insist on large-scale de-Stalinization and decommunization, referring to the practices of Eastern European countries.
Title: The image of J. V. Stalin in modern party discourse: “the shadow”
Description:
Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin remains one of the most talked about political figures of the XX century.
There is yet no consensus on the state level about his activity: the elite tries to avoid the assessment of controversial and ambiguous periods of national history.
Modern political parties develop the image of Stalin within the framework of development of their historical policy.
The article analyzes the attitude of the parties towards the Soviet leader, determines the key peculiarities of constructing the image, and ways of using references to the “Stalinist time” in the political struggle of modern Russia.
Research methodology employs the legal documents of the most popular parties, speeches and publications of their leaders.
The author concludes on the absence of unified approach of modern parties towards the figure of J.
V.
Stalin.
Among large political parties, the “United Russia” has no unequivocal opinion on Stalin, while the rest attribute themselves to apologists and critics.
The first group (the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, All-Russian Political Party “Rodina”, “Communists of Russia”) is characterized with high mythologization of the image of the “leader of peoples”, creating the image of the ideal leader, statesman and defender of interest of the country, omitting or justifying all negative actions.
The critics of J.
V.
Stalin differ in their approaches: such parties as LDPR, “Just Russia”, and partially “United Russia”) believe that the crimes of that time are sufficiently studied; while “PARNA” and “Yabloko” insist on large-scale de-Stalinization and decommunization, referring to the practices of Eastern European countries.
Related Results
“Indian Stalin”
“Indian Stalin”
Chief Minister of Tamilnadu and President of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party M.K.Stalin is one of the key players in modern India’s politics. He has got many supporters in South In...
Response: Mao and Stalin: Adversaries or Comrades?
Response: Mao and Stalin: Adversaries or Comrades?
In my view, the fundamental disagreement between Garver and me i, the estimation of the nature of the CCP-Moscow relationship, personalized in the relations between Mao and Stalin....
Whisk of the Red Broom: Stalin & Ukraine, 1928-1933 [PDF, E-Book]
Whisk of the Red Broom: Stalin & Ukraine, 1928-1933 [PDF, E-Book]
Once Joseph Stalin took the lead of the Soviet Bolshevists after the death of Vladimir Lenin, he quickly turned away from Lenin’s New Economic Policy, with its many concessions to ...
Double Exposure
Double Exposure
I. Happy Endings
Chaplin’s Modern Times features one of the most subtly strange endings in Hollywood history. It concludes with the Tramp (Chaplin) and the Gamin (Paulette Godda...
Reinventing the Party Wall - For Quality City Living
Reinventing the Party Wall - For Quality City Living
<p><b>The party wall is a commonly used building element that is rarely exploited to its full potential due to structural and legal complications. The party wall was in...
Yugoslavya-Sovyetler Birliği ya da Tito-Stalin Çatışması (1948)
Yugoslavya-Sovyetler Birliği ya da Tito-Stalin Çatışması (1948)
Öz: Bu çalışmada 1948 yılında Yugoslavya’nın Kominform’dan çıkarılmasının nedenleri ve sonuçları 1945 yılından 1948 yılına kadar yaşanan tarihsel olaylar çerçevesinde anlatılacaktı...
Political Party Systems in East and Southeast Asia
Political Party Systems in East and Southeast Asia
This article reviews academic work on party systems—defined as the patterns of interactions between political parties—in East and Southeast Asia (hereafter “East Asia”). Before dra...
DISCOURSE: KNOWLEDGE, NEWS, AND FAKE INTERTWINED
DISCOURSE: KNOWLEDGE, NEWS, AND FAKE INTERTWINED
Discourse has been a focal point for linguists over an extended period. The multidisciplinary character of the term ‘discourse’ has resulted in diverse approaches aiming to define ...


