Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Linking data systems into a collaborative pipeline for geochemical data from field to archive
View through CrossRef
<div>
<p>Management of geochemical data needs to consider the sequence of phases in the lifecycle of these data from field to lab to publication to archive. It also needs to address the large variety of chemical properties measured; the wide range of materials that are analyzed; the different ways, in which these materials may be prepared for analysis; the diversity of analytical techniques and instrumentation used to obtain analytical results; and the many ways used to calibrate and correct raw data, normalize them to standard reference materials, and otherwise treat them to obtain meaningful and comparable results. In order to extract knowledge from the data, they are then integrated and compared with other measurements, formatted for visualization, statistical analysis, or model generation, and finally cleaned and organized for publication and deposition in a data repository. Each phase in the geochemical data lifecycle has its specific workflows and metadata that need to be recorded to fully document the provenance of the data so that others can reproduce the results.</p>
</div><div>
<p>An increasing number of software tools are developed to support the different phases of the geochemical data lifecycle. These include electronic field notebooks, digital lab books, and Jupyter notebooks for data analysis, as well as data submission forms and templates. These tools are mostly disconnected and often require manual transcription or copying and pasting of data and metadata from one tool to the other. In an ideal world, these tools would be connected so that field observations gathered in a digital field notebook, such as sample locations and sampling dates, can be seamlessly send to an IGSN Allocating Agent to obtain a unique sample identifier with a QR code with a single click. The sample metadata would be readily accessible for the lab data management system that allows the researchers to capture information about the sample preparation, and that connects to the instrumentation to capture instrument settings and the raw data. The data would then be seamlessly accessed by data reduction software, visualized, and further compared to data from global databases that can be directly accessed. Ultimately, a few clicks will allow the user to format the data for publication and archiving.</p>
</div><div>
<p>Several data systems that support different stages in the lifecycle of samples and sample-based geochemical data have now come together to explore the development of standardized interfaces and APIs and consistent data and metadata schemas to link their systems into an efficient pipeline for geochemical data from the field to the archive. These systems include StraboSpot (www.strabospot.org;&#160;data system for digital collection, storage, and sharing of both field and lab data), SESAR (<span>www.geosamples.org</span>; sample registry and allocating agent for IGSN), EarthChem (www.earthchem.org; publishers and repository for geochemical data), Sparrow (sparrow-data.org; data system to organize analytical data and track project- and sample-level metadata), IsoBank (isobank.org; repository for stable isotope data), and MacroStrat (macrostrat.org; collaborative platform for geological data exploration and integration).</p>
</div>
Title: Linking data systems into a collaborative pipeline for geochemical data from field to archive
Description:
<div>
<p>Management of geochemical data needs to consider the sequence of phases in the lifecycle of these data from field to lab to publication to archive.
It also needs to address the large variety of chemical properties measured; the wide range of materials that are analyzed; the different ways, in which these materials may be prepared for analysis; the diversity of analytical techniques and instrumentation used to obtain analytical results; and the many ways used to calibrate and correct raw data, normalize them to standard reference materials, and otherwise treat them to obtain meaningful and comparable results.
In order to extract knowledge from the data, they are then integrated and compared with other measurements, formatted for visualization, statistical analysis, or model generation, and finally cleaned and organized for publication and deposition in a data repository.
Each phase in the geochemical data lifecycle has its specific workflows and metadata that need to be recorded to fully document the provenance of the data so that others can reproduce the results.
</p>
</div><div>
<p>An increasing number of software tools are developed to support the different phases of the geochemical data lifecycle.
These include electronic field notebooks, digital lab books, and Jupyter notebooks for data analysis, as well as data submission forms and templates.
These tools are mostly disconnected and often require manual transcription or copying and pasting of data and metadata from one tool to the other.
In an ideal world, these tools would be connected so that field observations gathered in a digital field notebook, such as sample locations and sampling dates, can be seamlessly send to an IGSN Allocating Agent to obtain a unique sample identifier with a QR code with a single click.
The sample metadata would be readily accessible for the lab data management system that allows the researchers to capture information about the sample preparation, and that connects to the instrumentation to capture instrument settings and the raw data.
The data would then be seamlessly accessed by data reduction software, visualized, and further compared to data from global databases that can be directly accessed.
Ultimately, a few clicks will allow the user to format the data for publication and archiving.
</p>
</div><div>
<p>Several data systems that support different stages in the lifecycle of samples and sample-based geochemical data have now come together to explore the development of standardized interfaces and APIs and consistent data and metadata schemas to link their systems into an efficient pipeline for geochemical data from the field to the archive.
These systems include StraboSpot (www.
strabospot.
org;&#160;data system for digital collection, storage, and sharing of both field and lab data), SESAR (<span>www.
geosamples.
org</span>; sample registry and allocating agent for IGSN), EarthChem (www.
earthchem.
org; publishers and repository for geochemical data), Sparrow (sparrow-data.
org; data system to organize analytical data and track project- and sample-level metadata), IsoBank (isobank.
org; repository for stable isotope data), and MacroStrat (macrostrat.
org; collaborative platform for geological data exploration and integration).
</p>
</div>.
Related Results
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Abstract
The paper describes the installation analysis for the Matterhorn field pipeline replacement, located in water depths between 800-ft to 1200-ft in the Gul...
First Arctic Subsea Pipelines Moving to Reality
First Arctic Subsea Pipelines Moving to Reality
Abstract
Two offshore development projects which involve subsea arctic pipelines are being proposed by British Petroleum Exploration (BP). Both projects are locat...
Development and Use of Simulation Trainers for Pipeline Controllers
Development and Use of Simulation Trainers for Pipeline Controllers
Enbridge is in the forefront of development and application of computer simulation based training systems for Pipeline Controllers. Since 1985, the Pipeline Dynamics section of Enb...
The Rosetta Science Archive: Enhancing the Scientific Content
The Rosetta Science Archive: Enhancing the Scientific Content
AbstractThis presentation will outline the current status of the Rosetta archive, as well as highlighting some of the ‘enhanced archiving’ activities that have ...
Geochemical landscapes
Geochemical landscapes
A geochemical landscape is the geochemical characterization of a given part of the earth based on the joint influence of climate, relief, geology and vegetation on the chemical pro...
A Fluid-pipe-soil Approach to Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines
A Fluid-pipe-soil Approach to Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines
Abstract
The conventional approach to submarine pipeline stability design considers interactions between water and pipeline (fluid-pipe) and pipeline and seabed (...
Pipeline Resistance
Pipeline Resistance
Pipeline resistance is where an often abstract and wonky climate movement meets the bravery and boldness of Indigenous and other frontline defenders of land and water who inspire d...
Electronic Equipment Provides Pipeline Monitoring and Protection: Applications and Limitations
Electronic Equipment Provides Pipeline Monitoring and Protection: Applications and Limitations
Background: Line break controls developed to date have provided the Pipeline Industry with the best protection available with proven and available technologies.
Ther...

