Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Aleksei A. Solonovich’s Mystical Anarchism (A Historical and Philosophical Analysis)
View through CrossRef
In this article the philosophical views of one of the key figures of 1920–1930s Russian mystical anarchism, Aleksei A. Solonovich, are reconstructed in a comprehensive manner. With the help of a historical and philosophical analysis based on the émigré community publications (newspapers and magazines), as well as on some archival documents, the author discloses the main peculiarities of Solonovich’s religious and philosophical thought. The latter, in fact, is based on the ideological synthesis of Gnosticism and anarchism within the following areas of knowledge: philosophical anthropology, philosophy of culture, and social philosophy. As a result, the origin of Aleksei A. Solonovich’s philosophical views appears to lie in the idea that, according to the Gnostic doctrine, all people are divided into three categories, which relate to the dimensions of physics, of the psyche, and of the soul. The article demonstrates that Solonovich associated his historical, cultural, and socio-philosophical views with this concept: in fact, an analysis of his biography – including the events of his life directly related to the history of the organization named “Order of Light” – allows us to draw such a conclusion. The author concludes that Solonovich’s intellectual life was inseparable from his social and political activity as a participant in the 1920-1930s mystical anarchist movement. This fact explains why he primarily decided to express himself through lectures, articles and philosophical essays, rather than through the format of large-scale monographs (the only significant book written by Solonovich was destroyed by Bolsheviks). In conclusion, it can be affirmed that Aleksei A. Solonovich epitomized many of the characteristic features of an intellectual who lived in the early 20th century in Russia (revolutionary spirit, radicalism, passion for mysticism, etc.), but at the same time, along with Apollon A. Karelin, he was a special intellectual, whose religious-philosophical views formed the basis of the ideology of a holistic movement within the theory of anarchism.
Title: Aleksei A. Solonovich’s Mystical Anarchism (A Historical and Philosophical Analysis)
Description:
In this article the philosophical views of one of the key figures of 1920–1930s Russian mystical anarchism, Aleksei A.
Solonovich, are reconstructed in a comprehensive manner.
With the help of a historical and philosophical analysis based on the émigré community publications (newspapers and magazines), as well as on some archival documents, the author discloses the main peculiarities of Solonovich’s religious and philosophical thought.
The latter, in fact, is based on the ideological synthesis of Gnosticism and anarchism within the following areas of knowledge: philosophical anthropology, philosophy of culture, and social philosophy.
As a result, the origin of Aleksei A.
Solonovich’s philosophical views appears to lie in the idea that, according to the Gnostic doctrine, all people are divided into three categories, which relate to the dimensions of physics, of the psyche, and of the soul.
The article demonstrates that Solonovich associated his historical, cultural, and socio-philosophical views with this concept: in fact, an analysis of his biography – including the events of his life directly related to the history of the organization named “Order of Light” – allows us to draw such a conclusion.
The author concludes that Solonovich’s intellectual life was inseparable from his social and political activity as a participant in the 1920-1930s mystical anarchist movement.
This fact explains why he primarily decided to express himself through lectures, articles and philosophical essays, rather than through the format of large-scale monographs (the only significant book written by Solonovich was destroyed by Bolsheviks).
In conclusion, it can be affirmed that Aleksei A.
Solonovich epitomized many of the characteristic features of an intellectual who lived in the early 20th century in Russia (revolutionary spirit, radicalism, passion for mysticism, etc.
), but at the same time, along with Apollon A.
Karelin, he was a special intellectual, whose religious-philosophical views formed the basis of the ideology of a holistic movement within the theory of anarchism.
Related Results
Evgeny Solonovich, Mikhail Vizel. A Russian Amarcord. I remember
Evgeny Solonovich, Mikhail Vizel. A Russian Amarcord. I remember
The review analyzes
A Russian Amarcord [Russkiy Amarkord],
a book of interviews with E. Solonovich (now recently dead) published in celebrat...
No Gods! No Masters!: From Ontological to Political Anarchism
No Gods! No Masters!: From Ontological to Political Anarchism
The aim of this chapter is to clarify one the most significant misunderstandings of Deleuze and Guattari’s political theory: the difference between their conceptions of ontological...
Philosophical Anarchism
Philosophical Anarchism
Anarchist political philosophers normally include in their theories (or implicitly rely upon) a vision of a social life very different than the life experienced by most persons tod...
Unsur Mistis Dalam Novel-Novel Karya Neno Cristiandi Nelis dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran di SMA (Tinjauan Antropologi Sastra)
Unsur Mistis Dalam Novel-Novel Karya Neno Cristiandi Nelis dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran di SMA (Tinjauan Antropologi Sastra)
Mystical is a spiritual effort in realizing the social relations that prevail in society. Mystical as an understanding that gives teachings that are secret or all-secret, hidden, d...
The epistemological anarchism of Feyerabend in the paradigm of post-classical science
The epistemological anarchism of Feyerabend in the paradigm of post-classical science
The subject of the research is Paul Feyerabend's epistemological anarchism in the context of the post-nonclassical science paradigm. The article explores how the critique of method...
Philosophical Anarchism
Philosophical Anarchism
Philosophical anarchism is a branch of political philosophy that is highly skeptical and sometimes even eliminative of the state. At their most ambitious, anarchist theories endors...
From New Anarchism to Post-anarchism
From New Anarchism to Post-anarchism
This chapter examines contemporary anarchist critiques of Kropotkin, especially post-anarchist analysis. It argues that science has become a byword to describe Kropotkin's politica...

