Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Causes of Debris-Covered Glacier Thinning: Evidence for the Importance of Ice Dynamics From Kennicott Glacier, Alaska

View through CrossRef
The cause of debris-covered glacier thinning remains controversial. One hypothesis asserts that melt hotspots (ice cliffs, ponds, or thin debris) increase thinning, while the other posits that declining ice flow leads to dynamic thinning under thick debris. Alaska’s Kennicott Glacier is ideal for testing these hypotheses, as ice cliffs within the debris-covered tongue are abundant and surface velocities decline rapidly downglacier. To explore the cause of patterns in melt hotspots, ice flow, and thinning, we consider their evolution over several decades. We compile a wide range of ice dynamical and mass balance datasets which we cross-correlate and analyze in a step-by-step fashion. We show that an undulating bed that deepens upglacier controls ice flow in the lower 8.5 km of Kennicott Glacier. The imposed velocity pattern strongly affects debris thickness, which in turn leads to annual melt rates that decline towards the terminus. Ice cliff abundance correlates highly with the rate of surface compression, while pond occurrence is strongly negatively correlated with driving stress. A new positive feedback is identified between ice cliffs, streams and surface topography that leads to chaotic topography. As the glacier thinned between 1991 and 2015, surface melt in the study area decreased, despite generally rising air temperatures. Four additional feedbacks relating glacier thinning to melt changes are evident: the debris feedback (negative), the ice cliff feedback (negative), the pond feedback (positive), and the relief feedback (positive). The debris and ice cliff feedbacks, which are tied to the change in surface velocity in time, likely reduced melt rates in time. We show this using a new method to invert for debris thickness change and englacial debris content (∼0.017% by volume) while also revealing that declining speeds and compressive flow led to debris thickening. The expansion of debris on the glacier surface follows changes in flow direction. Ultimately, glacier thinning upvalley from the continuously debris-covered portion of Kennicott Glacier, caused by mass balance changes, led to the reduction of flow into the study area. This caused ice emergence rates to decline rapidly leading to the occurrence of maximum, glacier-wide thinning under thick, insulating debris.
Title: The Causes of Debris-Covered Glacier Thinning: Evidence for the Importance of Ice Dynamics From Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
Description:
The cause of debris-covered glacier thinning remains controversial.
One hypothesis asserts that melt hotspots (ice cliffs, ponds, or thin debris) increase thinning, while the other posits that declining ice flow leads to dynamic thinning under thick debris.
Alaska’s Kennicott Glacier is ideal for testing these hypotheses, as ice cliffs within the debris-covered tongue are abundant and surface velocities decline rapidly downglacier.
To explore the cause of patterns in melt hotspots, ice flow, and thinning, we consider their evolution over several decades.
We compile a wide range of ice dynamical and mass balance datasets which we cross-correlate and analyze in a step-by-step fashion.
We show that an undulating bed that deepens upglacier controls ice flow in the lower 8.
5 km of Kennicott Glacier.
The imposed velocity pattern strongly affects debris thickness, which in turn leads to annual melt rates that decline towards the terminus.
Ice cliff abundance correlates highly with the rate of surface compression, while pond occurrence is strongly negatively correlated with driving stress.
A new positive feedback is identified between ice cliffs, streams and surface topography that leads to chaotic topography.
As the glacier thinned between 1991 and 2015, surface melt in the study area decreased, despite generally rising air temperatures.
Four additional feedbacks relating glacier thinning to melt changes are evident: the debris feedback (negative), the ice cliff feedback (negative), the pond feedback (positive), and the relief feedback (positive).
The debris and ice cliff feedbacks, which are tied to the change in surface velocity in time, likely reduced melt rates in time.
We show this using a new method to invert for debris thickness change and englacial debris content (∼0.
017% by volume) while also revealing that declining speeds and compressive flow led to debris thickening.
The expansion of debris on the glacier surface follows changes in flow direction.
Ultimately, glacier thinning upvalley from the continuously debris-covered portion of Kennicott Glacier, caused by mass balance changes, led to the reduction of flow into the study area.
This caused ice emergence rates to decline rapidly leading to the occurrence of maximum, glacier-wide thinning under thick, insulating debris.

Related Results

Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
<p>Many glaciers in High Mountain Asia are experiencing the debris-cover anomaly. The Kennicott Glacier, a large Alaskan Glacier, is also thinning most rapidly under ...
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part C: feedbacks between melt, ice dynamics, and surface processes
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part C: feedbacks between melt, ice dynamics, and surface processes
Abstract. The mass balance of many valley glaciers is enhanced by the presence of melt hotspots within otherwise continuous debris cover. We assess the effect of debris, melt hotsp...
Holocene thinning history of David Glacier, Antarctica
Holocene thinning history of David Glacier, Antarctica
<p>The Antarctic Ice Sheet is a significant component of the Earth System, modulating Earth‘s sea level and climate. Present day and projected ice mass losses from Antarctica...
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part B: ice cliff delineation and distributed melt estimates
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part B: ice cliff delineation and distributed melt estimates
Abstract. The mass balance of many valley glaciers is enhanced by the presence of ice cliffs within otherwise continuous debris cover. We assess the effect of debris and ice cliffs...
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part A:in situ mass balance measurements
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part A:in situ mass balance measurements
Abstract. The mass balance of many Alaskan glaciers is perturbed by debris cover. Yet the effect of debris on glacier response to climate change in Alaska has largely been overlook...
Studies on the Basal-Ice Zone of Findelen Glacier, Switzerland
Studies on the Basal-Ice Zone of Findelen Glacier, Switzerland
Basal and englacial debris layers have been observed to coincide distinctly with the location of glacier thrust planes or shear zones, e.g. at Shoestring Glacier (Brugman and Meier...
Debris cover effect on the evolution of glaciation in the Northern Caucasus
Debris cover effect on the evolution of glaciation in the Northern Caucasus
&lt;p&gt;A common disadvantage of almost all global glacier models is that they ignore the explicit description of the debris cover on the heat exchange of the glacier surf...

Back to Top