Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Economic Consequences of SEC Interpretive Guidance and the Effects on Firm Behavior: Evidence of Non-GAAP Earnings Disclosure
View through CrossRef
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued new a Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (CDI) in 2010, relaxing the stringent enforcement requirements of Regulations G and S-K. In this paper, we investigate whether this new, non-binding, SEC staff interpretation is an economically significant event and whether they allowed for a change in a firm’s voluntary disclosure. Using hand-collected non-GAAP earnings disclosure for S&P500 firms from 2006 to 2013, we find significantly positive 3-days cumulative abnormal returns on the announcement of new CDI announcement only for firms with informative non-GAAP reporters prior to the announcement, suggesting investors anticipate the benefits of relaxed interpretive guidance to be limited to informative non-GAAP reporters and investors view SEC staff interpretations as important regulatory actions that affects managers’ behaviors. We also find that managers more frequently use aggressive non-GAAP reporting in the post-CDI period, especially when managers have incentives to report non-GAAP earnings more aggressively and when the governance system is poor. This paper contributes to the voluntary disclosure and regulation literatures by providing empirical evidence that SEC interpretative guidance is economically important events and effective in shaping firms’ disclosure practices.
Title: The Economic Consequences of SEC Interpretive Guidance and the Effects on Firm Behavior: Evidence of Non-GAAP Earnings Disclosure
Description:
The U.
S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued new a Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (CDI) in 2010, relaxing the stringent enforcement requirements of Regulations G and S-K.
In this paper, we investigate whether this new, non-binding, SEC staff interpretation is an economically significant event and whether they allowed for a change in a firm’s voluntary disclosure.
Using hand-collected non-GAAP earnings disclosure for S&P500 firms from 2006 to 2013, we find significantly positive 3-days cumulative abnormal returns on the announcement of new CDI announcement only for firms with informative non-GAAP reporters prior to the announcement, suggesting investors anticipate the benefits of relaxed interpretive guidance to be limited to informative non-GAAP reporters and investors view SEC staff interpretations as important regulatory actions that affects managers’ behaviors.
We also find that managers more frequently use aggressive non-GAAP reporting in the post-CDI period, especially when managers have incentives to report non-GAAP earnings more aggressively and when the governance system is poor.
This paper contributes to the voluntary disclosure and regulation literatures by providing empirical evidence that SEC interpretative guidance is economically important events and effective in shaping firms’ disclosure practices.
Related Results
Essays on auditor quality and non-GAAP earnings
Essays on auditor quality and non-GAAP earnings
Chapter 1 provides empirical evidence that auditors may play a role in the disclosure of non-GAAP earnings. Using non-GAAP earnings disclosures hand-collected from firms' annual pr...
Non-GAAP Earnings Disclosure in Loss Firms
Non-GAAP Earnings Disclosure in Loss Firms
This study examines the incremental information in loss firms’ non-GAAP earnings disclosures relative to GAAP earnings. Using a large sample obtained through textual analysis and h...
US CEO Political Ideology and Non‐GAAP Earnings
US CEO Political Ideology and Non‐GAAP Earnings
ABSTRACT
We examine whether the disclosure and quality of non‐GAAP earnings are influenced by CEO political ideology in the United States. We find that Republican...
Quality Earnings: Insights from Comparing GAAP to NIPA Earnings
Quality Earnings: Insights from Comparing GAAP to NIPA Earnings
The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis produces a measure of aggregate corporate profits (NIPA earnings), which is an integral component of the accounting for GDP. The key advantage...
Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses: Empirical Evidence from Japan
Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses: Empirical Evidence from Japan
The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether and how Japanese firms manage reported earnings. We first investigate whether Japanese firm managers engage in earnings man...
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Contemporary art criticism often advances by way of interpretive extraction. Works are translated into meanings, themes, intentions, and arguments, which then circulate with remark...
Accounting Standards and Earnings Quality — Evidence from Registered ADRs
Accounting Standards and Earnings Quality — Evidence from Registered ADRs
This paper examines the changes in earnings quality of registered American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) as a result of switching accounting standards. We aim to shed light on the pot...
Earnings Non-Synchronicity and Voluntary Disclosure
Earnings Non-Synchronicity and Voluntary Disclosure
Earnings non-synchronicity reflects the extent to which firm-specific factors determine a firm’s earnings. Prior research suggests that high earnings non-synchronicity impedes corp...

