Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Indicator mineralogy of the KL-01 and KL-22 kimberlites, Lake Timiskaming kimberlite field, Ontario

View through CrossRef
Kimberlite and till samples from the recently discovered KL-01 and KL-22 kimberlites in the Lake Timiskaming kimberlite field, northeastern Ontario, have been studied by the Geological Survey of Canada to determine their kimberlite indicator mineral signatures. These new results compliment earlier work published on the Lake Timiskaming kimberlites by the GSC. The KL-01 kimberlite is covered by only 1 to 4 m of till and thus is deeply weathered. The KL-22 kimberlite is covered by more than 10 m of glacial sediments and thus is fresh at its subcropping surface. Both kimberlites contain thousands of indicator minerals per 10 kg in the 0.25 to 0.5 mm fraction. The kimberlites, however, are characterized by different relative abundance of indicator mineral species. The 0.25 to 2.0 mm fraction of the KL-22 kimberlite is dominated by chromite, with lesser amounts of Cr-pyrope and Cr-diopside, very few Mg-ilmenite, scarce eclogitic garnets, and no olivine. The 0.25 to 2.0 mm fraction of the KL-01 kimberlite is dominated by Cr-pyrope, with lesser amounts of chromite, Mg-ilmenite and Cr-diospide, scarce eclogitic garnets, and no olivine. Till overlying the KL-22 kimberlite contains only a few tens of indicator mineral grains and does not contain much garnet, a relatively abundant indicator mineral in the KL-22 kimberlite. Thus this till likely reflects background concentrations in the area rather than incorporation of KL-22 kimberlite debris. Indicator mineral populations of the KL-01 and KL-22 kimberlites are dominated by chromite, Crpyrope, and Cr-diopside from fertile garnet lherzolite. Subcalcic garnets are abundant as well but they are only marginally Cr-rich with respect to diamond potential and magnesiochromites include some diamond inclusion and diamond intergrowth field. Garnet megacrysts are rare in both kimberlites, as are orange diamond sub-class eclogite garnets. Similar mineral compositions and age dates for the two kimberlites strongly suggest that KL-01 and KL-22 are genetically related.
Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management
Title: Indicator mineralogy of the KL-01 and KL-22 kimberlites, Lake Timiskaming kimberlite field, Ontario
Description:
Kimberlite and till samples from the recently discovered KL-01 and KL-22 kimberlites in the Lake Timiskaming kimberlite field, northeastern Ontario, have been studied by the Geological Survey of Canada to determine their kimberlite indicator mineral signatures.
These new results compliment earlier work published on the Lake Timiskaming kimberlites by the GSC.
The KL-01 kimberlite is covered by only 1 to 4 m of till and thus is deeply weathered.
The KL-22 kimberlite is covered by more than 10 m of glacial sediments and thus is fresh at its subcropping surface.
Both kimberlites contain thousands of indicator minerals per 10 kg in the 0.
25 to 0.
5 mm fraction.
The kimberlites, however, are characterized by different relative abundance of indicator mineral species.
The 0.
25 to 2.
0 mm fraction of the KL-22 kimberlite is dominated by chromite, with lesser amounts of Cr-pyrope and Cr-diopside, very few Mg-ilmenite, scarce eclogitic garnets, and no olivine.
The 0.
25 to 2.
0 mm fraction of the KL-01 kimberlite is dominated by Cr-pyrope, with lesser amounts of chromite, Mg-ilmenite and Cr-diospide, scarce eclogitic garnets, and no olivine.
Till overlying the KL-22 kimberlite contains only a few tens of indicator mineral grains and does not contain much garnet, a relatively abundant indicator mineral in the KL-22 kimberlite.
Thus this till likely reflects background concentrations in the area rather than incorporation of KL-22 kimberlite debris.
Indicator mineral populations of the KL-01 and KL-22 kimberlites are dominated by chromite, Crpyrope, and Cr-diopside from fertile garnet lherzolite.
Subcalcic garnets are abundant as well but they are only marginally Cr-rich with respect to diamond potential and magnesiochromites include some diamond inclusion and diamond intergrowth field.
Garnet megacrysts are rare in both kimberlites, as are orange diamond sub-class eclogite garnets.
Similar mineral compositions and age dates for the two kimberlites strongly suggest that KL-01 and KL-22 are genetically related.

Related Results

Middle Paleozoic Basites of the Nakyn Kimberlite Field
Middle Paleozoic Basites of the Nakyn Kimberlite Field
Abstract Within the Nakyn kimberlite field, kimberlites with a unique diamond tenor are spatially associated with different-aged basites of various composition and e...
Kimberlite and Lamproite Rocks of Vajrakarur Area, Andhra Pradesh
Kimberlite and Lamproite Rocks of Vajrakarur Area, Andhra Pradesh
Abstract Kimberlite and lamproite diatremes of late Proterozoic age (840 to 1020 m.y.) within the Archaean granites and gneisses (Peninsular Gneiss) around Vajrakaru...
Morphology of trap sills near kimberlites
Morphology of trap sills near kimberlites
Research subject. Trap sills of the Daldin-Alakit diamond-bearing region of western Yakutia. Aim. To establish the reason for the influence of sedimentary rocks containing kimberli...
Localization of High-Titanium Dolerites in Kimberlite Fields: Possible Causes and a New Criterion for Kimberlite Search
Localization of High-Titanium Dolerites in Kimberlite Fields: Possible Causes and a New Criterion for Kimberlite Search
Abstract —The generalized chemical composition data on the studied dolerites from the Vilyui–Markha dike swarm (Vilyui paleorift) allowed detecting geochemically ano...
Magnetoelastic effect of kimberlite host rocks (Yakutsk diamondiferous province)
Magnetoelastic effect of kimberlite host rocks (Yakutsk diamondiferous province)
The purpose of the research is to conduct petro- and paleomagnetic studies of Early Paleozoic rocks of the carbonate basement of a number of diamond deposits in the Yakutsk diamond...
Geomorphology of the lakebed and sediment deposition during the Holocene in Lake Visovac
Geomorphology of the lakebed and sediment deposition during the Holocene in Lake Visovac
<p>Lake Visovac is a tufa barrier lake on the Krka River between Roški slap (60 m asl) and Skradinski buk (46 m absl) waterfalls, included in the Krka na...
Specific features of basic kimberlite mass composition
Specific features of basic kimberlite mass composition
The conducted studies have shown that kimberlite diatremes are characterized by individual mineral features of the rocks that compose them. Sometimes these differences are inheren...
Diamond exploration techniques emphasising indicator mineral geochemistry and Canadian examples
Diamond exploration techniques emphasising indicator mineral geochemistry and Canadian examples
The vast Canadian Shield and adjacent areas underlain by cratonic rocks represent a highly prospective geological environment for diamonds. This has recently been demonstrated by t...

Back to Top