Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cultural Memory in Contemporary Fiction: F. R. Leavis’s and Matthew Arnold’s Intellectual Presence in A. S. Byatt’s Work
View through CrossRef
The concept of “cultural memory” serves as the foundation for this article, which explains the complex relationships between two prominent figures in the history of English letters, Matthew Arnold and F. R. Leavis, as well as how A. S. Byatt’s own work was influenced by their combined, though occasionally diametrically opposed, approaches to literature, culture, and criticism. As a result, this article begins with a discussion of the conflictual continuity and/or sustained ambivalence in Byatt’s critique of Leavisite criticism. It does this by first looking into Leavis’s position within the larger literary criticism context and then focusing on how Leavisite criticism fits into Byatt’s critical thought. Thus, Byatt’s assertion that Leavis made English literature the focal point of university education is examined by first looking into Leavis’s Cambridge. Lastly, Byatt’s criticism of Leavis’s idea of English studies is looked into in the context of critical evaluations of English literature’s place in higher education, at the same time that Byatt’s work is used as a prism to analyse the Arnoldian matrix of the Leavisite concept of “moral seriousness”. Afterward, Byatt’s critical work is critically examined in the framework of culture, society, and literature, continuing Arnold’s legacy.
Title: Cultural Memory in Contemporary Fiction: F. R. Leavis’s and Matthew Arnold’s Intellectual Presence in A. S. Byatt’s Work
Description:
The concept of “cultural memory” serves as the foundation for this article, which explains the complex relationships between two prominent figures in the history of English letters, Matthew Arnold and F.
R.
Leavis, as well as how A.
S.
Byatt’s own work was influenced by their combined, though occasionally diametrically opposed, approaches to literature, culture, and criticism.
As a result, this article begins with a discussion of the conflictual continuity and/or sustained ambivalence in Byatt’s critique of Leavisite criticism.
It does this by first looking into Leavis’s position within the larger literary criticism context and then focusing on how Leavisite criticism fits into Byatt’s critical thought.
Thus, Byatt’s assertion that Leavis made English literature the focal point of university education is examined by first looking into Leavis’s Cambridge.
Lastly, Byatt’s criticism of Leavis’s idea of English studies is looked into in the context of critical evaluations of English literature’s place in higher education, at the same time that Byatt’s work is used as a prism to analyse the Arnoldian matrix of the Leavisite concept of “moral seriousness”.
Afterward, Byatt’s critical work is critically examined in the framework of culture, society, and literature, continuing Arnold’s legacy.
Related Results
Effects of Contextual Cues on False Memory: A Comparative Experimental Approach
Effects of Contextual Cues on False Memory: A Comparative Experimental Approach
Research on false memory formation using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm has been extensively conducted in Western contexts. Yet, a significant gap remains in experimen...
Book Review: Wonder Tales in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt. Ed. by Alexandra Cheira
Book Review: Wonder Tales in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt. Ed. by Alexandra Cheira
Edited by Alexandra Cheira, Wonder Tales in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt is composed of seven essays penned by different distinguished Byatt scholars focusing on Byatt’s wonder tales...
“I Have This Kind of Grief for the Earth”: A.S. Byatt’s Ecopoetics in
Ragnarök
, “Thoughts on Myth” and “Sea Story”
“I Have This Kind of Grief for the Earth”: A.S. Byatt’s Ecopoetics in
Ragnarök
, “Thoughts on Myth” and “Sea Story”
Abstract
A.S. Byatt has expressed deep misgivings regarding the role which the human species has played in mis/shaping the natural world due ...
Edward Thomas and the Georgians
Edward Thomas and the Georgians
Leavis was wrong about Edward Thomas. This judgment was put to me during a typically uneasy supervision with an eminent scholar. Leavis had used Thomas in the second chapter of New...
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
The National Cultural Policy Discussion Paper—drafted to assist the Australian Government in developing the first national Cultural Policy since Creative Nation nearly two decades ...
Work Values
Work Values
Research has identified TV series and, also more recently social media, as different actors in vocational socialization, providing individuals with career-related information (Levi...
Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research
Edited CollectionRimmer, Matthew (Ed.) (2015) Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar, Chel...
Embodied Art: A Reading of A. S. Byatt’s ‘Body Art’
Embodied Art: A Reading of A. S. Byatt’s ‘Body Art’
Abstract
This article examines the idea of an embodied art in A. S. Byatt’s short story ‘Body Art’. In order to contextualize this concept, the essay begins with a s...

