Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An Examination of “Don't Know” Responses in Forensic Interviews with Children
View through CrossRef
Most experimental studies examining the use of pre‐interview instructions (ground rules) show that children say “I don't know” more often when they have been encouraged to do so when appropriate. However, children's “don't know” responses have not been studied in more applied contexts, such as in investigative interviews. In the present study, 76 transcripts of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children revealed patterns of “don't know” responding, as well as interviewers’ reactions to these responses. Instructions to say “I don't know” when appropriate did not affect the frequency with which children gave these responses. Interviewers rejected “don't know” responses nearly 30% of the time, and typically continued to ask about the same topic using more risky questions. Children often answered these follow‐up questions even though they had previously indicated that they lacked the requested information. There was no evidence that “don't know” responses indicated reluctance to talk about abuse. Implications for forensic interviewers are discussed. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Title: An Examination of “Don't Know” Responses in Forensic Interviews with Children
Description:
Most experimental studies examining the use of pre‐interview instructions (ground rules) show that children say “I don't know” more often when they have been encouraged to do so when appropriate.
However, children's “don't know” responses have not been studied in more applied contexts, such as in investigative interviews.
In the present study, 76 transcripts of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children revealed patterns of “don't know” responding, as well as interviewers’ reactions to these responses.
Instructions to say “I don't know” when appropriate did not affect the frequency with which children gave these responses.
Interviewers rejected “don't know” responses nearly 30% of the time, and typically continued to ask about the same topic using more risky questions.
Children often answered these follow‐up questions even though they had previously indicated that they lacked the requested information.
There was no evidence that “don't know” responses indicated reluctance to talk about abuse.
Implications for forensic interviewers are discussed.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Results
REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)
REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)
The article analyzes conceptual foundations, views and ideas as to understanding of the essence of the classification of forensic science general theory tasks. The main views of sc...
CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
A historical analysis of forensic techniques and forensic science emergence as scientific branches is outlined, their interconnection, differences are considered, the subject, obje...
Forensic Pathology Fellowship Training Positions and Subsequent Forensic Pathology Work Effort of past Forensic Pathology Fellows
Forensic Pathology Fellowship Training Positions and Subsequent Forensic Pathology Work Effort of past Forensic Pathology Fellows
The purpose of this study is to document the number of accredited, funded, and filled forensic pathology fellowship positions in the United States and to document the subsequent wo...
The System of Forensic Activity Digitalization Theory
The System of Forensic Activity Digitalization Theory
The article examines the system of private theory of forensic activity digitalization from the standpoint of forensic expertology. The subject, objects, tasks of the theory and its...
Forensic Botany: The Growing Discipline Revolutionizing Plant Science and Criminal Investigations
Forensic Botany: The Growing Discipline Revolutionizing Plant Science and Criminal Investigations
Introduction: Forensic botany is the study of plants in legal cases. It's a fast-growing field. Changing criminal investigations and plant research. Forensic botanists analyze plan...
Development and implementation of forensic anthropology in Swedish forensic practice
Development and implementation of forensic anthropology in Swedish forensic practice
Abstract
This paper presents the ongoing development of forensic anthropology in Sweden. We discuss the background of the discipline, its application, as well as its...
The utilisation of scientific crime investigation methods and forensic evidence in the criminal investigation process in Indonesia
The utilisation of scientific crime investigation methods and forensic evidence in the criminal investigation process in Indonesia
Abstract
Background
Modern crimes, including cybercrimes, financial fraud, and terrorism, are increasingly complex, transnational, and sophistica...
Unlocking Mysteries: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Forensic Science
Unlocking Mysteries: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Forensic Science
Abstract: “Unlocking Mysteries: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Forensic Science” delves into the collaborative landscape of forensic investigations, where biology, chemistry, phy...

