Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundTo assess the cost-effectiveness of the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in the treatment of patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) from a societal perspective in the healthcare sector Zaragoza III in Spain.MethodsA Markov model with five states defined by visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye (Snellen scale) and an additional death state were constructed. Two cohorts of patients were distributed along the VA states and treated during a year with either dexamethasone or aflibercept. One-year follow-up on each group was performed. Medical costs related to the DME treatment and follow-up, medical costs related to the DME comorbidities, and non-medical-related costs were taken into account. Costs (2020 €), health outcomes (Quality-Adjusted Life Years-QALYs), both discounted at a 3.5% annual rate, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER: €/QALY) were determined for a lifetime horizon in the base case analysis.ResultsPatients treated with dexamethasone were €77,349 more costly and provided 2.667 additional QALYs (€29,002/QALY) than those treated with aflibercept. The variable efficiency per patient was calculated dividing the improvement in quality of life (on the VFQ-25 scale) by the cost of the treatment. With the obtained results it can be concluded that the efficiency of treating the patients with dexamethasone is significantly superior than the efficiency of treating them with aflibercept.ConclusionsThe cost per QALY gained with the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with the one obtained by aflibercept in the naïve DME population is just below the €30,000 threshold, below which, new drugs are sometimes regarded as cost-effective strategies in Spain. In this model, the key variables with greater impact on the cost-effectiveness results were the selected time horizon, the chosen extrapolation method and the number of aflibercept and dexamethasone injections.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in naïve diabetic macular edema
Description:
AbstractBackgroundTo assess the cost-effectiveness of the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with aflibercept in the treatment of patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) from a societal perspective in the healthcare sector Zaragoza III in Spain.
MethodsA Markov model with five states defined by visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye (Snellen scale) and an additional death state were constructed.
Two cohorts of patients were distributed along the VA states and treated during a year with either dexamethasone or aflibercept.
One-year follow-up on each group was performed.
Medical costs related to the DME treatment and follow-up, medical costs related to the DME comorbidities, and non-medical-related costs were taken into account.
Costs (2020 €), health outcomes (Quality-Adjusted Life Years-QALYs), both discounted at a 3.
5% annual rate, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER: €/QALY) were determined for a lifetime horizon in the base case analysis.
ResultsPatients treated with dexamethasone were €77,349 more costly and provided 2.
667 additional QALYs (€29,002/QALY) than those treated with aflibercept.
The variable efficiency per patient was calculated dividing the improvement in quality of life (on the VFQ-25 scale) by the cost of the treatment.
With the obtained results it can be concluded that the efficiency of treating the patients with dexamethasone is significantly superior than the efficiency of treating them with aflibercept.
ConclusionsThe cost per QALY gained with the delayed-release device of dexamethasone compared with the one obtained by aflibercept in the naïve DME population is just below the €30,000 threshold, below which, new drugs are sometimes regarded as cost-effective strategies in Spain.
In this model, the key variables with greater impact on the cost-effectiveness results were the selected time horizon, the chosen extrapolation method and the number of aflibercept and dexamethasone injections.
Related Results
Safety of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema, macular edema following retinal vein occlusion and neovascular age related macular degeneration in a Ghanaian population: A phase I randomized interventional study v1
Safety of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema, macular edema following retinal vein occlusion and neovascular age related macular degeneration in a Ghanaian population: A phase I randomized interventional study v1
Brief Background: Retinal vascular diseases are a significant cause of visual loss world-wide, including Ghana. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) such as afliberc...
Use of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Use of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of aflibercept by comparison with bevacizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.Methods: The...
Aflibercept or ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema; a retrospective study
Aflibercept or ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema; a retrospective study
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of diabetic retinopathy and a major cause of vision loss. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two in...
Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Neovascular Age–Related Macular Degeneration Therapy: Environmental Impact of Transitioning to Aflibercept 8 mg
Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Neovascular Age–Related Macular Degeneration Therapy: Environmental Impact of Transitioning to Aflibercept 8 mg
Purpose
To quantify and compare the carbon footprint associated with neovascular age–related macular degeneration (nAMD) treatment using real‐world intravitreal...
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE DEGREE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AND DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE DEGREE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AND DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
INTRODUCTION: WHO estimates more than 150 million diabetes patients worldwide. One of the complications of diabetes is diabetic retinopathy which is recognized as the leading cause...
THE EFFECT OF AGE ON AFLIBERCEPT (EYLEA) RESPONSE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
THE EFFECT OF AGE ON AFLIBERCEPT (EYLEA) RESPONSE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
Purpose:
To investigate the effect of age on aflibercept (Eylea) response in macular edema secondary to treatment-naive diabetic eyes.
...
EFFECT OF PHACOEMULSIFICATION ON THE PROGRESSION OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AND DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
EFFECT OF PHACOEMULSIFICATION ON THE PROGRESSION OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AND DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
Background: DR is the leading cause of vision loss in adults aged 22-74 years. DR ranked as the fth most common causes of preventable
blindness. In cataract surgery, blood aqueous...
Association of Types of Diabetic Macular Edema with Different Anti-Diabetic Therapies
Association of Types of Diabetic Macular Edema with Different Anti-Diabetic Therapies
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate and assess the association of diabetic macular edema with different anti-diabetic therapy regimens. Material and Methods: We recruited 340 patients...

