Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children

View through CrossRef
The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft. This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG). The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time. In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture. The external fixator time in group A was 10.7 months (range 8–14.5) versus 7.8 months (range 4–11.5 months) in group B (FG). In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD. The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.1 and 30.8%, good in 38.5 and 46.2, fair in 30.8 and 15.4, and poor in 7.6 and 7.6%, respectively. The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.1 and 18.2%, good in 63.6 and 45.5%, fair in 18.2 and 27.2%, and poor in 9.1 and 9.1%, respectively. Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods. The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator. However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD. Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft. The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD. However, it has a long external fixation time.
Title: Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children
Description:
The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft.
This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.
5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG).
The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time.
In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture.
The external fixator time in group A was 10.
7 months (range 8–14.
5) versus 7.
8 months (range 4–11.
5 months) in group B (FG).
In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD.
The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.
1 and 30.
8%, good in 38.
5 and 46.
2, fair in 30.
8 and 15.
4, and poor in 7.
6 and 7.
6%, respectively.
The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.
1 and 18.
2%, good in 63.
6 and 45.
5%, fair in 18.
2 and 27.
2%, and poor in 9.
1 and 9.
1%, respectively.
Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods.
The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator.
However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD.
Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft.
The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD.
However, it has a long external fixation time.

Related Results

Proximal Tibial Epiphysiodesis in a Growing Dog
Proximal Tibial Epiphysiodesis in a Growing Dog
 Background: It is believed that the inclined tibial plateau angle to be a major cause of cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture, and the treatment of this disease is the tibial p...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Comparative effectiveness of the Ilizarov method versus internal fixation for complex tibial fractures
Comparative effectiveness of the Ilizarov method versus internal fixation for complex tibial fractures
Background: Complex tibial fractures often occur with high-energy trauma and significant soft tissue injury. Optimal management remains controversial due to infection risks, nonuni...
Are the outcomes of bone transport in the treatment of bone defects in the upper- middle and lower-middle tibia similar?
Are the outcomes of bone transport in the treatment of bone defects in the upper- middle and lower-middle tibia similar?
The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of bone transport in treating upper- middle vs. lower- middle tibial bone defects. Sixty-two patients with tibial infected large se...
Reconstruction of complex hand defects using trapezoidal osteocutaneous free fibular flap
Reconstruction of complex hand defects using trapezoidal osteocutaneous free fibular flap
AbstractBackgroundTraumatic defects of multiple metacarpal bones can be addressed using conventional or vascularized bone grafts. When associated with extensive skin and tendon los...
Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Tensionable Loops and Suture Tape Reinforcement
Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Tensionable Loops and Suture Tape Reinforcement
Background: The posterolateral corner (PLC) is an important knee stabilizer that resists varus stress, external tibial rotation, and posterior tibial translatio...
Management of traumatic tibial defects using free vascularized fibula or Ilizarov bone transport: A comparative study
Management of traumatic tibial defects using free vascularized fibula or Ilizarov bone transport: A comparative study
Abstract There are several options for the treatment of traumatic tibial defects. Among these options, free vascularized fibula and Ilizarov bone transport are we...

Back to Top