Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children
View through CrossRef
The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft. This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG). The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time. In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture. The external fixator time in group A was 10.7 months (range 8–14.5) versus 7.8 months (range 4–11.5 months) in group B (FG). In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD. The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.1 and 30.8%, good in 38.5 and 46.2, fair in 30.8 and 15.4, and poor in 7.6 and 7.6%, respectively. The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.1 and 18.2%, good in 63.6 and 45.5%, fair in 18.2 and 27.2%, and poor in 9.1 and 9.1%, respectively. Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods. The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator. However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD. Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft. The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD. However, it has a long external fixation time.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children
Description:
The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft.
This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.
5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG).
The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time.
In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture.
The external fixator time in group A was 10.
7 months (range 8–14.
5) versus 7.
8 months (range 4–11.
5 months) in group B (FG).
In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD.
The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.
1 and 30.
8%, good in 38.
5 and 46.
2, fair in 30.
8 and 15.
4, and poor in 7.
6 and 7.
6%, respectively.
The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.
1 and 18.
2%, good in 63.
6 and 45.
5%, fair in 18.
2 and 27.
2%, and poor in 9.
1 and 9.
1%, respectively.
Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods.
The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator.
However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD.
Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft.
The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD.
However, it has a long external fixation time.
Related Results
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Are the outcomes of bone transport in the treatment of bone defects in the upper- middle and lower-middle tibia similar?
Are the outcomes of bone transport in the treatment of bone defects in the upper- middle and lower-middle tibia similar?
The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of bone transport in treating upper- middle vs. lower- middle tibial bone defects. Sixty-two patients with tibial infected large se...
Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Tensionable Loops and Suture Tape Reinforcement
Lateral Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Tensionable Loops and Suture Tape Reinforcement
Background:
The posterolateral corner (PLC) is an important knee stabilizer that resists varus stress, external tibial rotation, and posterior tibial translatio...
A prospective comparative study of distal tibia and fibula fractures treated with tibial interlocking nailing with and without fibular plating
A prospective comparative study of distal tibia and fibula fractures treated with tibial interlocking nailing with and without fibular plating
Background: Distal both bone leg fractures present significant challenges in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes ...
Factors Influencing Common Fibular Nerve Course Variability before Bifurcation into the Superficial Fibular Nerve and Deep Fibular Nerve: A Cadaveric Study
Factors Influencing Common Fibular Nerve Course Variability before Bifurcation into the Superficial Fibular Nerve and Deep Fibular Nerve: A Cadaveric Study
Background and Objectives: The common fibular nerve (CFN) has anatomical variance between individuals as it transitions from the posterior thigh to the anterior leg. The nerve’s co...
Management of fracture non-union long bones by limb reconstruction devices
Management of fracture non-union long bones by limb reconstruction devices
Background: The limb reconstruction system (LRS), rail road fixator, and Ilizarov fixator are used to treat open fractures with bone loss and infective non-union of long bones. It ...
Folded Free Vascularized Fibular Bone Graft for Segmental Femoral Bone Defect: a Retrospective Report
Folded Free Vascularized Fibular Bone Graft for Segmental Femoral Bone Defect: a Retrospective Report
Abstract
ObjectiveVascularized fibular bone graft is an efficient method for various segmental bone defects. The objective of this report is to introduce our experience of ...
Ilizarov-Assisted Reduction of Femoral Condyle Locked in Tibial Fracture: A Case Report
Ilizarov-Assisted Reduction of Femoral Condyle Locked in Tibial Fracture: A Case Report
Introduction: Tibial plateau fractures are commonly managed using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques. However, external fixation through minimally invasive meth...

