Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nanobody-based chimeric antigen receptor (NbCAR) T cells for in-vivo cancer immunotherapy: A systematic review

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Conventional chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) construct is produced using the ScFv of a target specific antibody and has encountered significant challenges in treating cancer, e.g., adverse effects, T cell exhaustion, safety concerns, and sub optimal efficacy in solid tumors. An alternative approach could be to use the outer portion of a nano antibody, named the VHH, for CAR production. The CAR construct produced with this method is named the "nanobody CAR." Nanobody CAR T cells are less immunogenic, more efficient, and easier to manufacture, and thus might be a reliable alternative approach to overcome the barriers associated with conventional CAR T therapy. Materials and methods: Following a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Google Scholar, available preclinical animal model studies which focused on the safety and efficacy of nanobody CAR T therapy in cancer were included. Results: 338 studies were identified (up to September 15th, 2023), of which 17 studies used nanobody CAR T cells against tumor cells in animal models of different malignancies, including acute leukemia (seven studies), lymphoma (foure studies), hepatocellular carcinoma (three studies), multiple myeloma (two studies), melanoma (one study), colon adenocarcinoma (one studies), TNBC (one study), lung tumor (one study), ovarian adenocarcinoma (one study), multiple myeloma (two studies), and pancreatic cancer (one study). The most common CAR structure was the second generation and, in some cases, the third generation. CD28, 4 1BB, and ICOS were used as co stimulatory domains in the structure. Compared to the control groups, nanobody CAR T cells had a better performance in reducing tumor volume and improving survival. The included studies incorporated significant heterogeneity regarding their reported outcomes and study design, making it impossible to conduct a meta analysis. The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool was used to assess the risk of bias, which showed potential bias in the included studies. Conclusion: According to small size, ideal stability, high affinity, and manufacturing practicality, nanobody CAR T cells serve as a promising strategy to improve in vivo mice survival and reduce tumor size. To obtain more reliable results, future studies should focus on diminishing the heterogeneity of study design and bias. Protocol registration: PROSPERO; registration number CRD42023425817, registered June 13th, 2023
Title: Nanobody-based chimeric antigen receptor (NbCAR) T cells for in-vivo cancer immunotherapy: A systematic review
Description:
Abstract Background: Conventional chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) construct is produced using the ScFv of a target specific antibody and has encountered significant challenges in treating cancer, e.
g.
, adverse effects, T cell exhaustion, safety concerns, and sub optimal efficacy in solid tumors.
An alternative approach could be to use the outer portion of a nano antibody, named the VHH, for CAR production.
The CAR construct produced with this method is named the "nanobody CAR.
" Nanobody CAR T cells are less immunogenic, more efficient, and easier to manufacture, and thus might be a reliable alternative approach to overcome the barriers associated with conventional CAR T therapy.
Materials and methods: Following a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Google Scholar, available preclinical animal model studies which focused on the safety and efficacy of nanobody CAR T therapy in cancer were included.
Results: 338 studies were identified (up to September 15th, 2023), of which 17 studies used nanobody CAR T cells against tumor cells in animal models of different malignancies, including acute leukemia (seven studies), lymphoma (foure studies), hepatocellular carcinoma (three studies), multiple myeloma (two studies), melanoma (one study), colon adenocarcinoma (one studies), TNBC (one study), lung tumor (one study), ovarian adenocarcinoma (one study), multiple myeloma (two studies), and pancreatic cancer (one study).
The most common CAR structure was the second generation and, in some cases, the third generation.
CD28, 4 1BB, and ICOS were used as co stimulatory domains in the structure.
Compared to the control groups, nanobody CAR T cells had a better performance in reducing tumor volume and improving survival.
The included studies incorporated significant heterogeneity regarding their reported outcomes and study design, making it impossible to conduct a meta analysis.
The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool was used to assess the risk of bias, which showed potential bias in the included studies.
Conclusion: According to small size, ideal stability, high affinity, and manufacturing practicality, nanobody CAR T cells serve as a promising strategy to improve in vivo mice survival and reduce tumor size.
To obtain more reliable results, future studies should focus on diminishing the heterogeneity of study design and bias.
Protocol registration: PROSPERO; registration number CRD42023425817, registered June 13th, 2023.

Related Results

Abstract 1786: Mesothelin-targeting, nanobody-based CAR T cells effectively target solid tumors in fully immunocompetent hosts
Abstract 1786: Mesothelin-targeting, nanobody-based CAR T cells effectively target solid tumors in fully immunocompetent hosts
Abstract Nanobody-based chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are currently being tested in early phase clinical trials against blood and solid tumor antigens. Owi...
A Nanobody Interaction with SARS-CoV-2 Spike Allows the Versatile Targeting of Lentivirus Vectors
A Nanobody Interaction with SARS-CoV-2 Spike Allows the Versatile Targeting of Lentivirus Vectors
ABSTRACT While investigating methods to target gene delivery vectors to specific cell types, we examined the potential of using a nanobody against the SARS-CoV-2 Sp...
The A-Z of APCs
The A-Z of APCs
Cancers develop through a complex interplay of factors such as the accumulation of oncogenic mutations, epigenetic and posttranslational modifications, and interactions with the ex...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that mimics carcinoma. GM can coexist with breast cancer (BC), though the relationship rema...
Sex Differences in Breast Cancer: Implications for Immunotherapy and Combination Treatments
Sex Differences in Breast Cancer: Implications for Immunotherapy and Combination Treatments
Background: Sex differences in breast cancer are critical determinants of tumor biology, treatment responses, and clinical outcomes. Despite breast cancer’s predominance in women, ...

Back to Top