Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Lithological and structural control on the seismicity distribution in Central Italy

View through CrossRef
<p>In the seismically active region of Central Italy, national (permanent) and local (not-permanent) seismic networks provided very accurate location of the seismicity recorded during the major seismic sequences occurred in the last 25 years (e.g. 1997-1998; 2009; 2016-2017), as well as of the background seismicity registered in the intervening periods.  In the same region, a network of seismic reflection profiles, originally acquired for oil exploration purposes, is also available, effectively imaging the geological structure at depth, to be compared with the seismicity distribution. </p><p>This comparison reveals that, if the position of the brittle/ductile transition exerts a role at regional scale for the occurrence of crustal seismicity, at a more local scale the depth and thickness of the seismogenic layer is mostly controlled by the contrasting rheological properties of the different lithological groups involved in the upper crust. </p><p>The upper crust stratigraphy, including the sedimentary cover and the uppermost part of the basement, consists of alternated strong (rigid, e.g. carbonates and dolostones) end weak (not-rigid, e.g. shales, sandstones, and phyllites) layers. This mechanically complex multilayer is involved in a belt of imbricated thrusts (Late Miocene-Early Pliocene), displaced by subsequent extensional (normal) faults (Late Pliocene-present), responsible for the observed regional seismicity. The top of the basement s.l. (composed of clastic sedimentary and slightly metamorphosed rocks) is involved in major thrusts.  For these different lithological units, combined field and lab studies of fault rock properties have documented localized and potentially unstable deformation occurring in granular mineral phases (carbonates) and distributed and stable slip within phyllosilicate-rich shear zones (shales and phyllites).</p><p>By comparing the geological structure with the seismicity distribution, we observed that:</p><p>-     The seismicity cut-off (i.e. the bottom of the seismogenic layer) is structurally (not thermally) controlled, and grossly corresponds to the top basement; the upper boundary of the seismogenic layer corresponds to the top of carbonates.</p><p>-     Most seismicity occurs within the rigid layers (carbonates and evaporites), and do not penetrate the turbidites and basements rocks.</p><p>-      Close to the axial region of the mountain range, where the larger amount of shortening is observed, the presence thrust sheets from the previous compressional phase, significantly affect the seismicity distribution and propagation.</p><p>-     Major east-dipping extensional detachments, recognized in the seismic profiles, are also marked by distinctive seismicity alignments.</p>
Title: Lithological and structural control on the seismicity distribution in Central Italy
Description:
<p>In the seismically active region of Central Italy, national (permanent) and local (not-permanent) seismic networks provided very accurate location of the seismicity recorded during the major seismic sequences occurred in the last 25 years (e.
g.
1997-1998; 2009; 2016-2017), as well as of the background seismicity registered in the intervening periods.
  In the same region, a network of seismic reflection profiles, originally acquired for oil exploration purposes, is also available, effectively imaging the geological structure at depth, to be compared with the seismicity distribution.
 </p><p>This comparison reveals that, if the position of the brittle/ductile transition exerts a role at regional scale for the occurrence of crustal seismicity, at a more local scale the depth and thickness of the seismogenic layer is mostly controlled by the contrasting rheological properties of the different lithological groups involved in the upper crust.
 </p><p>The upper crust stratigraphy, including the sedimentary cover and the uppermost part of the basement, consists of alternated strong (rigid, e.
g.
carbonates and dolostones) end weak (not-rigid, e.
g.
shales, sandstones, and phyllites) layers.
This mechanically complex multilayer is involved in a belt of imbricated thrusts (Late Miocene-Early Pliocene), displaced by subsequent extensional (normal) faults (Late Pliocene-present), responsible for the observed regional seismicity.
The top of the basement s.
l.
(composed of clastic sedimentary and slightly metamorphosed rocks) is involved in major thrusts.
 For these different lithological units, combined field and lab studies of fault rock properties have documented localized and potentially unstable deformation occurring in granular mineral phases (carbonates) and distributed and stable slip within phyllosilicate-rich shear zones (shales and phyllites).
</p><p>By comparing the geological structure with the seismicity distribution, we observed that:</p><p>-     The seismicity cut-off (i.
e.
the bottom of the seismogenic layer) is structurally (not thermally) controlled, and grossly corresponds to the top basement; the upper boundary of the seismogenic layer corresponds to the top of carbonates.
</p><p>-     Most seismicity occurs within the rigid layers (carbonates and evaporites), and do not penetrate the turbidites and basements rocks.
</p><p>-      Close to the axial region of the mountain range, where the larger amount of shortening is observed, the presence thrust sheets from the previous compressional phase, significantly affect the seismicity distribution and propagation.
</p><p>-     Major east-dipping extensional detachments, recognized in the seismic profiles, are also marked by distinctive seismicity alignments.
</p>.

Related Results

Induced earthquakes at the carbon sequestration site Carbfix2, Hellisheiði, Iceland
Induced earthquakes at the carbon sequestration site Carbfix2, Hellisheiði, Iceland
<p>The 303 MW Hellisheiði, Iceland geothermal power plant was commissioned in 2006 and in early September 2011, reinjection of geothermal fluid was initi...
Seismicity under a dormant volcano: unveiling active crustal faulting beneath Piton des Neiges, La Réunion
Seismicity under a dormant volcano: unveiling active crustal faulting beneath Piton des Neiges, La Réunion
Earthquakes occur regularly in the vicinity of La Réunion's two main hotspot volcanoes, Piton des Neiges and Piton de la Fournaise. While earthquakes at Piton de la Fourna...
Spatiotemporal Diffusion Variability of Injection-Induced Seismicity in Enhanced Geothermal Systems
Spatiotemporal Diffusion Variability of Injection-Induced Seismicity in Enhanced Geothermal Systems
Abstract Injection-induced seismicity represents a major challenge for the development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). To effectively mitigate the associated seismi...
Instrumental seismicity of the Amatrice earthquake epicentral area: a review 
Instrumental seismicity of the Amatrice earthquake epicentral area: a review 
<p><em>This study presents a review of the instrumental seismicity of the Norcia-Amatrice area (central Italy) where a still on-going seismic sequence started on August...
Modeling earthquake numbers by Negative Binomial Hidden Markov models
Modeling earthquake numbers by Negative Binomial Hidden Markov models
&lt;p&gt;Modeling seismicity data is challenging and it remains a subject of ongoing research. Assumptions about the distribution of earthquake numbers play an important ro...
Seismicity Pattern Changes Prior to the 2008 Ms7.3 Yutian Earthquake
Seismicity Pattern Changes Prior to the 2008 Ms7.3 Yutian Earthquake
Seismicity pattern changes that are associated with strong earthquakes are an interesting topic with potential applications for natural hazard mitigation. As a retrospective case s...
How strong will be the following earthquake?
How strong will be the following earthquake?
&lt;p&gt;In this study, we have applied to northeastern Italy and western Slovenia medium-low seismicity an algorithm for strong aftershock forecasting we originally develo...

Back to Top