Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Algorithmic Governance and Public Accountability: Audits, Transparency, and Harm

View through CrossRef
Algorithmic systems are increasingly embedded in public administration, shaping decisions in areas such as social services, law enforcement, urban governance, and financial regulation. While these systems promise efficiency, scalability, and data-driven insights, their deployment also raises significant concerns regarding transparency, fairness, discrimination, and accountability. This paper examines the governance of algorithmic systems through three central mechanisms: audits, transparency, and harm assessment. It explores how algorithmic governance frameworks can ensure the responsible deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems while safeguarding public trust and democratic values. The study reviews mechanisms of internal and external audits, emphasizing the importance of standardized auditing procedures, performance metrics, and independent oversight to evaluate algorithmic performance and detect biases or unintended consequences. It further analyzes transparency practices, including data provenance, model disclosure, explainability, and governance records, which enable citizens, regulators, and stakeholders to understand and scrutinize automated decision-making processes. In addition, the paper discusses various forms of harm arising from algorithmic systems, ranging from individual-level discrimination and privacy violations to systemic risks that undermine democratic institutions and social cohesion. Drawing on international case studies from municipal governments and public service delivery contexts, the paper highlights both the opportunities and limitations of current governance approaches. It concludes that effective algorithmic governance requires multi-layered accountability structures involving policymakers, public institutions, industry actors, and civil society. Strengthening auditing standards, enhancing transparency, and establishing robust mechanisms for harm mitigation and redress are essential to ensure that algorithmic systems operate in ways that promote fairness, protect human rights, and uphold democratic accountability. Keywords: Algorithmic Governance, Public Accountability, Algorithmic Audits, Transparency and Explainability, and Algorithmic Harm.
International Digital Organization for Scientific Research
Title: Algorithmic Governance and Public Accountability: Audits, Transparency, and Harm
Description:
Algorithmic systems are increasingly embedded in public administration, shaping decisions in areas such as social services, law enforcement, urban governance, and financial regulation.
While these systems promise efficiency, scalability, and data-driven insights, their deployment also raises significant concerns regarding transparency, fairness, discrimination, and accountability.
This paper examines the governance of algorithmic systems through three central mechanisms: audits, transparency, and harm assessment.
It explores how algorithmic governance frameworks can ensure the responsible deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems while safeguarding public trust and democratic values.
The study reviews mechanisms of internal and external audits, emphasizing the importance of standardized auditing procedures, performance metrics, and independent oversight to evaluate algorithmic performance and detect biases or unintended consequences.
It further analyzes transparency practices, including data provenance, model disclosure, explainability, and governance records, which enable citizens, regulators, and stakeholders to understand and scrutinize automated decision-making processes.
In addition, the paper discusses various forms of harm arising from algorithmic systems, ranging from individual-level discrimination and privacy violations to systemic risks that undermine democratic institutions and social cohesion.
Drawing on international case studies from municipal governments and public service delivery contexts, the paper highlights both the opportunities and limitations of current governance approaches.
It concludes that effective algorithmic governance requires multi-layered accountability structures involving policymakers, public institutions, industry actors, and civil society.
Strengthening auditing standards, enhancing transparency, and establishing robust mechanisms for harm mitigation and redress are essential to ensure that algorithmic systems operate in ways that promote fairness, protect human rights, and uphold democratic accountability.
Keywords: Algorithmic Governance, Public Accountability, Algorithmic Audits, Transparency and Explainability, and Algorithmic Harm.

Related Results

Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Background Medication harm can lead to hospital admission, prolonged hospital stay and poor patient outcomes. Reducing medication harm is a priority for healthc...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Review of the Handbook of Accounting, Accountability and Governance edited by Garry D. Carnegie and Christopher J. Napier
Review of the Handbook of Accounting, Accountability and Governance edited by Garry D. Carnegie and Christopher J. Napier
The Handbook, edited by eminent professors of accounting Garry D. Carnegie (Australia) and Christopher J. Napier (the United Kingdom), was published by Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd ...
Algorithmic Management in AI-Driven Recruitment: The AI Recruitment Governance Framework (ARGF) for Responsible AI Governance
Algorithmic Management in AI-Driven Recruitment: The AI Recruitment Governance Framework (ARGF) for Responsible AI Governance
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into organizational recruitment processes is transforming how organizations identify, evaluate, and select job candidates. AI-...
The Evolution of Clinical Audit as a Quality Improvement Tool in Gaza
The Evolution of Clinical Audit as a Quality Improvement Tool in Gaza
Rationale, aims and objective Clinical audit plays a fundamental role in improving the quality of patient care and hence, is considered a cornerstone of clinical governance. This s...
Audit Sektor Publik sebagai Instrumen Penguatan Good Governance dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Publik
Audit Sektor Publik sebagai Instrumen Penguatan Good Governance dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Publik
Public sector audits play a strategic role in supporting the realization of good governance, particularly in public financial management, which demands high levels of accountabilit...
A Scoping Review: Self-harm pada Remaja
A Scoping Review: Self-harm pada Remaja
Abstract. Adolescents are seen as an age group that is vulnerable to self-harm. In recent years, cases of self-harm have increased. Exposure to physical, emotional, social changes ...
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui hubungan kualitas audit, komite audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah (DPS) terhadap kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia pada tahun...

Back to Top