Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Comprehensive Study of The Criminalization of Parental Violence Against Children (Legal, Human Rights, and Sharia Perspectives)

View through CrossRef
This study is a qualitative study with a descriptive approach, namely an approach that aims to describe each main topic in this study, including the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of Indonesian law, the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of human rights, and the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of sharia law. The data used in this study are secondary data that researchers obtained from books, scientific articles, laws and regulations, websites, and so on. The data obtained was analyzed using the stages of data collection, data selection, data reduction, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion in this article show that from an Indonesian legal perspective, criminalization or violence against children is subject to varying penalties depending on the type of criminalization or violence committed. In physical violence in the form of abuse, the maximum penalty is three years and six months and/or a fine of Rp. 72,000,000.00 for minor abuse. The maximum penalty is five years if the child experiences serious injuries with a fine and/or Rp. 100,000,000.00 for abuse that causes serious injuries. And is subject to a maximum of fifteen years imprisonment and/or a fine of Rp. 300,000.00 if the child dies. If the violence is committed by a parent, a third of the sentence is added. In contrast to physical criminalization, parents can be sentenced to a minimum of five years imprisonment and a maximum of fifteen years if they commit sexual violence against their child, an additional one-third. From a human rights and Islamic law perspective, this is a heinous and prohibited act and the perpetrator must be punished according to the level of criminalization and violence.
Title: A Comprehensive Study of The Criminalization of Parental Violence Against Children (Legal, Human Rights, and Sharia Perspectives)
Description:
This study is a qualitative study with a descriptive approach, namely an approach that aims to describe each main topic in this study, including the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of Indonesian law, the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of human rights, and the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of sharia law.
The data used in this study are secondary data that researchers obtained from books, scientific articles, laws and regulations, websites, and so on.
The data obtained was analyzed using the stages of data collection, data selection, data reduction, and drawing conclusions.
The conclusion in this article show that from an Indonesian legal perspective, criminalization or violence against children is subject to varying penalties depending on the type of criminalization or violence committed.
In physical violence in the form of abuse, the maximum penalty is three years and six months and/or a fine of Rp.
72,000,000.
00 for minor abuse.
The maximum penalty is five years if the child experiences serious injuries with a fine and/or Rp.
100,000,000.
00 for abuse that causes serious injuries.
And is subject to a maximum of fifteen years imprisonment and/or a fine of Rp.
300,000.
00 if the child dies.
If the violence is committed by a parent, a third of the sentence is added.
In contrast to physical criminalization, parents can be sentenced to a minimum of five years imprisonment and a maximum of fifteen years if they commit sexual violence against their child, an additional one-third.
From a human rights and Islamic law perspective, this is a heinous and prohibited act and the perpetrator must be punished according to the level of criminalization and violence.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Semiotic Violence
Semiotic Violence
Semiotic violence against female politicians is a subtype of violence against women in politics or VAWP (Krook, 2017), which operates at the level of portrayal and representation o...
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Fig. 1: Photo by Miguel Orós, from unsplash.comFeminism has stalled at the bedroom door. In the post-#metoo era, more than ever, we need intimate civil rights in our relationships ...

Back to Top